October 20, 2024 - 6:00 PM - Planning Board Meeting Minutes

10 MEETING OF THEJOHNSTONCOUNTYPLANNING BOARD Tuesday , October 15 , 2024 6 00 pm The Johnston County Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday , October 15 , 2024 at 6 00 pm in the County Commissioners Meeting Room , Johnston County Courthouse Annex , Smithfield , NC with the following members Present Michelle Davis , Brooke Holmes , Debbie Howard , Freddie Hudson , Will Letchworth , Timothy Little , Gary Lovering , Jay Sasser Absent Jared Crenshaw , BOCC Representative , BOE Representative Also present Braston Newton , Director ; Todd Marr , Senior Planner ; Cameron Pittman , Planner ; Jennifer Slusser , County Attorney Chairman Letchworth opened the meeting at 6 00 pm with the Pledge of Allegiance led byMr Little Approval of the Minutes Upon a motion by Mr Hudson to approve the September 17 , 2024 Planning Board Minutes , seconded by Ms Holmes , and carried by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 , the September 17 , 2024 Planning Board Minutes were approved as presented All speakers were sworn in Subdivisions Raynor Sands Phase2 Owner Anastasia Perez Martinez Developer None Listed Surveyor Engineer Jimmy Barbour Surveying , PA Acreage Lots 2674 acres , 1 lots Tax ID # 09I17020S Address 115 Raynor Sands Dr Mr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information Mr Marr stated the subdivision was tabled at the September 2024 Planning Board Meeting at the request of the Applicant Mr Marr spoke about direct driveway access onReedy Prong Church Rd and from the Johnston County Land Design Manual regarding developments creating 4 or more lots Chairman Letchworth asked about the previous subdivision resulting in the subject property Mr Marr responded that the owner is now wanting to subdivide the subject property 1PageMr Jimmy Barbour , 213 S Second St , Smithfield , NC , Surveyor , stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Barbour stated that the owner wanted to divide the subject property into two lots in order to put another dwelling on the lot that fronts Reedy Prong Church Rd Mr Barbour stated that it had received approval from Environmental Health Ms Davis asked about the gravel path shownon the preliminary plat Mr Barbour responded that the gravel path was existing Ms Davis asked about access to lot 3A Mr Barbour responded that access comes off of Raynor Sands Dr by an access easement and that the owner lives on lot 3A Mr Barbour presented an updated preliminary plat to the Board Ms Howard asked if the current owner would remain on lot 3A per the updated preliminary plat and if the entire subject property was part of the original Raynor Sands Subdivision Mr Barbour responded yes to both questions MsHoward asked if the subdivision allowed for a lot to be subdivided again Mr Barbour stated the subdivision was done in 2012 Ms Holmes asked if the restrictive covenant for the subdivision would state if it could be subdivided again MsHoward asked about the original approval for the subdivision Mr Barbour responded that was the reason for the current request Mr Newtoncommented from the audience Chairman Letchworth asked about the approval from Environmental Health Mr Barbour discussed the location of the septic area for lot 3B and the designated septic easement located on lot 3A Chairman Letchworth asked if the septic area for lot 3B would be located on lot 3A Mr Barbour responded yes and that it would be a septic easement allowed by Environmental Health Mr Lovering asked if it would pass over the buffer Mr Barbour responded yes 2PageMr Sasser asked if it would go across Sharp Branch Mr Barbour responded yes Mr Barbour stated that the supply lines would run across Ms Davis spoke about the design of the updated preliminary plat with regards to lot lines Mr Barbour confirmed Ms Davis asked about the distance between the proposed driveway for lot 3B and Brock Rd Mr Barbour responded approximately 200ft Ms Lisa Williams , 186 Thornton Rd , Newton Grove , NC , a nearby property owner , expressed concern for the wetland area stating that they have livestock on their property Ms Williams stated that over the last year they have watched the wetlands become filled with debris , including drywall and styrofoam Ms Williams asked about the results from an environmental impact study Ms Williams expressed concern for the possible future impact on the wetlands and nearby soils Ms Williams asked about the subdivision already being approved and about the driveway access being located in the wetlands Chairman Letchworth stated that the information presented stated that Environmental Health had approved the septic layout but that the Planning Board wouldmake a decision regarding the proposed subdivision Ms Williams stated that she wanted the stream preserved and expressed concerns for the subject property owner filling in the stream and wetland area Ms Williams also expressed concerns for contamination of the water that runs through her land and the contamination of her pasture There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staff recommended denial due to less than 500 ft of driveway separation and direct driveway access onto Reedy Prong Church Rd Chairman Letchworth asked staff if there were any reservations from the amended plat presented at the meeting Mr Newtoncommented from the audience Mr Little asked if there was a homeon the subject property currently Mr Newton responded that there was a home on the property , but that the home is not in place 3PageMsHoward asked if the homewould end upon lot 3A Ms Davis responded with lot 3B Mr Marr responded that a house wasmoved onto lot 3B without approval Mr Sasser asked about the dumpingon the subject property Mr Marr stated that there is an open investigation about the dumping Chairman Letchworth expressed concern for the septic easement Staff Recommendation Denial Upon a motion by Mr Little to deny Raynor Sands Phase 2 , seconded by Ms Holmes , Raynor Sands Phase 2 was denied by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Hammer Tract Owner Two Forty - Two - Lan , LLC Developer Two Forty - Two , LLC Surveyor Engineer Alsey J Gilbert , PLS Acreage Lots 2234 acres , 20 lots Tax ID # 01F11064H Address 1600 Block of NCHWY 242S Mr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information Mr Jonathan Barnes , 446 E Main St , Clayton , NC , Dalton Engineering and Associates , stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Barnes spoke about the location of the proposed mail kiosk and the on - site conventional septic systems Mr Lovering asked about the existing pondon the adjacent land Mr Barnes responded that the preliminary plat is based on GIS and the exact location of the pond and riparian buffer are not known at this time Mr Lovering asked about access around the entirety of the pond for the adjacent property owner Mr Little asked about proposed lots 17 , 18 , 19 , and 20 and them bordering the edge of the pond Mr Lovering stated that the adjacent property owner may want access around the entirety of the pond in order to take care of the pond Mr Little asked about the light shaded area on the preliminary plat and if it was a buffer 4PagePage pageNumber5Mr Barnes responded that it was a riparian buffer There was discussion among the Board concerning the pond Chairman Letchworth asked to view the subject property and adjacent pondon GIS Mr Barnes asked if the Board would want an access easement in the riparian buffer Ms Davis discussed future owners of lots 17 - 20 thinking that they have access to the pond because of an easement MsHolmes expressed concern for multiple owners of the pond MsHoward asked about moving the property line at the pond Mr Little suggested verifying the existing property line in relation to the location of the pond Mr Barnes stated that the preliminary plat is based on GIS and is not exact Mr Barnes stated that a survey would take place MsHoward asked if an approval could be made with a condition concerning the property line in relation to the pond MsHolmes suggested tabling the request Mr Newtoncommented from the audience Mr Hudsonrecommended waiting until a survey could be performed and brought back to the Board Ms Howard recommended offering a suggestion and encouraging communication between the property owners Chairman Letchworth restated the concerns of multiple owners of the pond as well as understanding exactly the edge of the pond in relation to the proposed lots Mr Barnes stated that an option may be for the riparian buffer around the pond to be placed into the HOA Chairman Letchworth responded that it would be consistent with what the Board has approved in the past to avoid multiple ownerships of a property There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff report 5PagePage pageNumber6Mr Little asked the Board for clarity if there were any other issues with the proposed subdivision Several Board members responded that there were no other issues Staff Recommendation Approval Upon a motion by Ms Holmes to table Hammer Tract until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting in order to have a survey verifying the boundaries of the pond , seconded by Ms Howard , Hammer Tract was tabled by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting EarpWest Owner David F Earp Developer Cloudbreak Investments , LLC Surveyor Engineer Adams & Hodge Engineering , PC Acreage Lots 3051 acres , 22 lots Tax ID # 16L05040C Address 600 Block of Lynch Rd Mr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information Mr Andrew Hodge , 314 E Main St , Clayton , NC , Becker Morgan Group , stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Hodge spoke about the location of the proposed mail kiosk Mr Hodge stated that the wetlands at the back of the subject property had been delineated by a professional environmentalist Mr Hodge stated that the buffers had been removed from the site Mr Ronald Keese , 117 E Battery Circle , Selma , NC , an adjacent property owner , expressed concerns Mr Keese asked if there would be a buffer between his property and the subject property Chairman Letchworth stated that the Ordinance does not require buffers between like uses , but the Board would ask the Applicant Chairman Letchworth also stated that generally from a construction standpoint , the entire parcel is not always cleared leaving some natural vegetation after building the house Mr Keese asked about the builder Mr Keese also expressed concern for access to NC HWY 42 and asked if there were any proposed improvements for the intersection of Lynch Rd and NC HWY 42 Mr Newton spoke about a planned roundabout at NC HWY 42 and Thanksgiving Fire Rd Chairman Letchworth spoke about the County’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the opportunity for public comments 6PagePage pageNumber7Chairman Letchworth asked Mr Hodge about planned buffers , builders , and any NCDOT transportation improvements Mr Hodge responded that there is no plan for buffers Mr Hodge stated that generally the whole lot is not cleared but that it cannot be guaranteed Mr Hodge stated that he did not have any information from NCDOT regarding the Lynch Rd and NC HWY 42 intersection Mr Hodge also stated that they do not have a decision on a builder Mr Hudson asked about the minimum lot size requirements with concerns for lots 16A , 17A , and 19A Mr Hodge responded that those lots are off - site septic lots Ms Davis asked if those lots would be cleared Mr Hodge responded that the septic lots would be cleared only for septic typically unless the future property owner did otherwise Chairman Letchworth asked if the septic lots were primary or backup Mr Hodge responded that he did not know Chairman Letchworth spoke to Mr Keese about lot 16A being a septic lot and not a homesite There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff report Staff Recommendation Approval Upon a motion by Ms Holmes to approve Earp West , seconded byMr Little , Earp West was approved by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Ms Davis spoke of the enrollment numbers in the school district Conditions and Requirements [ Planning ] 1 All lots must be a minimum of 30,000 sf 2 Complete flood plain information 3 Metes & bounds 4 Certifications 5 Entrance sign & street signs 6 Street name approval 7PagePage pageNumber87 All lots shall access internal streets 8 Cul - de - sac lots must have 40 ’ road frontage 9 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 10 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance DM Sec 7 , L item 8 11 Fee - in - lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording 12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14 - 75 d 3 13 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster box mail receptacle units a CBU shall not impede the flow of traffic b CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility services c CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements [ Environmental Health ] 14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot [ NCDOT ] 15 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to construction 16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures , NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards , and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways 17 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any road improvements will be required [ Public Utilities ] 18 Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 19 Stormwater Statement Required 20 Wetlands should be delineated and shownon the plan if any are present as well as any jurisdictional features and buffers A buffer call will be necessary 21 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater management 22 Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline construction 23 Waterline will have to be designed to serve any planned downstream future projects [ Emergency Services ] 24 Relocate hydrant at end of cul - de - sac to between lots 14 and 15 25 Provide a fire flow test MargotManor 8PagePage pageNumber9Owner Neta Grady Developer Triangle Land Partners , LLC Surveyor Engineer 4D Site Solutions , Inc Acreage Lots 12582 acres , 108 lots Tax ID # 07D07027 Address 3500 Block of Benson Hardee Rd Mr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information Mr Marr stated that a reverse frontage buffer is required for lots backing up to Benson Hardee Rd Mr Marr also stated that a TIA was completed since the proposed subdivision is over 100 lots Ms Davis asked if there was a turn lane Mr Lovering stated that there was not one in the TIA Mr Little stated that the road has to have 4,000 cars a day on a secondary road Ms Davis asked about a Voluntary Agricultural District note on the preliminary plat Mr Scott Brown , 409 Chicago Dr Suite 112 , Fayetteville , NC , 4D Site Solutions , stated the particulars of the subdivision and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Brown stated that NCDOT had reviewed the TIA and did not recommend any improvements for Benson Hardee Rd Mr Brown stated that fire flow testing was done and there is plenty of water available for the development Mr Brown stated that open space would be provided outside of the wetland areas Mr Brown stated a buffer determination was done and no buffers were determined for the subject property Mr Brown stated that preliminary septic analysis had been completed and there is septic available on the lots as shown on the preliminary plat Ms Davis spoke in appreciation for the designated open space Mr Jason Carter , 904 Neuse Ridge Dr , Clayton , NC , adjacent property owner , provided history for the land stating that it has been in their family for almost 250 years with a commitment to keep the land dedicated to farming Mr Carter spoke about the number of subdivisions and lots approved over the last three years Mr Carter expressed concerns for the impact on the agricultural properties within the County stating that his property is in the second largest concentration of agricultural districts in the County Mr Carter asked that the County work to minimize the impact large developments have on continuing agricultural traditions Mr Carter expressed concerns for flooding and stormwater on Mingo Swamp and wetlands and its impact on neighboring farmlands Mr Carter referenced a previously denied subdivision , Eagles Landing Phase 5 , located near the subject property Mr Carter also referenced a previously approved subdivision , Turlington Tract , located near the subject property Mr Carter expressed concerns for the proposed impervious allocation Mr Carter asked about the existing pond on the subject property Mr Carter expressed concerns for stormwater runoff Mr Carter also suggested visual and windbreak barriers to help minimize the impact plowing will have on the 9Page0homes in the proposed development Mr Carter asked about required buffers along blue lines on the subject property Chairman Letchworth asked Mr Brown about the plan for the pond on the subject property , how water runoff will be handled , and about buffers Mr Brown stated the blue line is a wetland line and not a stream Mr Brown stated that the only stream existing on the subject property is on the southern border adjacent to Mr Pollard’s property Mr Brown stated that a buffer determination was done through the County Mr Brown stated that the existing pond will remain and will be in a common area with no intention of doing anything with it other than it being an amenity Mr Brown stated that the development will be in the center of the subject property with open space to the northern and southern portions of the subject property remaining in open space Mr Brown stated that land will only be cleared for what is necessary for homes and septic fields Mr Brown stated that clearing would be minimal Mr Brown stated that the impervious allocation is at fifteen percent or lower with the proposed development , below the County’s threshold requirement Mr Brown stated the subject property shares a common watershed with Mr Carter’s property and both properties drain into the watershed and not onto one another’s property Mr Brown stated that it will be draining the natural draining areas through the wetlands and there is no on - site retention or planned on - site retention at this point Mr Brown stated that they are meeting the County requirements and starting to collect construction and permit drawings Mr Brown stated that there is no planned windbreak or dust break at this time Mr Brown stated that the intent is to leave the open space as natural as possible other than any amenities the developer or builder may add to enhance the pond There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff report Ms Davis stated that the Voluntary Agricultural Districts need to be added to the preliminary plat Chairman Letchworth spoke in appreciation for the buffering and thought put into the design Chairman Letchworth also spoke about the County’s rewriting of the development ordinances and about opportunities for public input Ms Davis spoke in appreciation for the open space Mr Lovering spoke about the open space and in appreciation for Mr Carter’s attendance and remarks Ms Davis spoke of the enrollment numbers in the school district Staff Recommendation Approval 10Page1Upon a motion by Mr Lovering to approve Margot Manor , seconded by Mr Sasser , Margot Manor was approved by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Conditions and Requirements [ Planning ] 1 All lots must be a minimum of 30,000 sf 2 Complete flood plain information 3 Metes & bounds 4 Certifications 5 Entrance sign & street signs 6 Street name approval 7 All lots shall access internal streets 8 Cul - de - sac lots must have 40 ’ road frontage 9 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee 10 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance DM Sec 7 , L item 8 11 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Benson Hardee Rd 12 Show to whom open space is dedicated 13 Provide 20 ’ fee simple access to open space 14 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14 - 75 d 3 15 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster box mail receptacle units a CBU shall not impede the flow of traffic b CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility services c CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements [ Environmental Health ] 16 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot [ NCDOT ] 17 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior to construction 18 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures , NCDOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards , and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways 19 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any road improvements will be required [ Public Utilities ] 11Page220 Stormwater & Erosion Control Permits Required 21 Stormwater Statement Required 22 Wetlands should be delineated and shownon the plan if any are present as well as any jurisdictional features and buffers A buffer call will be required for the portion of the property draining to the Neuse Basin 23 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater management 24 Construction plans will have to be submitted and approved for waterline construction [ Emergency Services ] 25 Provide construction details for access roads 26 Provide cul - de - sac details 27 Provide a fire flow test 28 Provide fire hydrant distribution plan layout There wasa brief five minute break Rezoningand Conditional Zoning Cases Chairman Letchworth stated that Case TXT 24 - 02 , Case 24 - 27 , and Case 24 - 28 requested to be tabled until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Upon a motion by Ms Howard to table Case TXT 24 - 02 until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting , seconded by Mr Little , Case TXT 24 - 02 was tabled by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Upon a motion by Ms Howard to table Case 24 - 27 until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting , seconded byMr Sasser , Case 24 - 27 was tabled by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Upon a motion byMsHolmes to table Case 24 - 28 until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting , seconded by Mr Hudson , Case 24 - 28 was tabled by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting RezoningCase 24 - 23 Rezoning Petition General Business - Conditional Zoning GB - CZ to Agricultural Residential AR Tax ID 11M02007A Owner Renee Baker Applicant Renee Baker Location 32 acres of a 4182 acre tract located at 2072 Earpsboro Rd in the O’Neals Township Mr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above Mr Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned General Business - Special Use District GB - SUD and approved for Indoor and Outdoor storage and antique shop and Ice cream 12Page3retail Mr Marr spoke about the surrounding land uses Mr Marr stated that the area is located within a designated “ Rural Living Placetype ” on the County’s Envision Johnston Comprehensive LandUse Plan Ms Renee Baker , 2072 Earpsboro Rd , Zebulon , NC , stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staff recommendation of approval and presented a draft statement of consistency Staff Recommendation Approval Upon a motion by Ms Holmes to approve Rezoning Case 24 - 23 , seconded byMr Little , Rezoning Case 24 - 23 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Rezoning Case 24 - 23 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their December 2 , 2024 meeting Consistency Statement This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan “ Envision Johnston 2040 ” in that it takes away the commercial designation and takes it back to its original Agricultural Residential designation RezoningCase 24 - 24 Rezoning Petition General Business - Special Use District GB - SUD to General Business - Conditional Zoning GB - CZ Tax ID 16L05035B Owner Pittman Pines , LLC Applicant Hunter Dawkins , 4 Rivers Acquisitions , LLC Location 448 acre tract located at 5691NCHwy42E in the Wilders Township Conditional Zoning Request Mini - Storage Mr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above Mr Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned General Business - Special Use District and approved for an event venue Mr Marr spoke about the surrounding land uses Mr Marr stated that the area is located within a designated “ Rural Living ” future land use Placetype on the County’s Envision Johnston Comprehensive LandUse Plan Mr Mark Frederick , 301 Fayetteville Street , Suite 1400 , Raleigh , NC , Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein , stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Frederick stated the proposed site plan includes one primary building with a portion being two - story with interior accessed units Mr Frederick stated that there are also proposed outside units Mr Frederick stated that the 13Page4units are screened so it will not be visible from NC HWY 42 Mr Frederick discussed presentation slides detailing the elevations of the units Mr Lovering asked about security access for the site Mr Hunter Dawkins , 4 Rivers Acquisitions , LLC , was also present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Dawkins responded that the site will not offer 24 - hour access , but there will be a gate to secure the facility Mr Dawkins stated that people will access the site using key codes to get through the gate Mr Dawkins stated that the gate access would be through the turns and should not backup onNCHWY 42 Mr Frederick stated that they have reached out to NCDOT and are waiting for a response There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staff recommendation of approval and presented a draft statement of consistency , based on the fact that the land is already approved for an event center and a storage facility would be a lower volume of traffic use Chairman Letchworth asked the Applicant if they had read and agreed to the conditions in the staff report Mr Frederick responded yes Staff Recommendation Approval Upon a motion by Mr Little to approve Rezoning Case 24 - 24 , seconded byMs Holmes , Rezoning Case 24 - 24 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Rezoning Case 24 - 24 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their December 2 , 2024 meeting Consistency Statement This request is consistent in that the approved use of the parcel now is for an event venue and changing it to a storage facility would not increase the volume of traffic to the property substantially It is also adjacent to a property zoned GB - SUD Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions 1 That the use or development is located , designed , and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the public health , safety , and general welfare ; Applicant The proposed self - service storage facility is ideally situated on Highway 42and will provide nearby residents with easy and convenient access to a neighborhood service The surrounding area is quickly developing with more 14Page5dense residential uses such as townhomes and apartments , which traditionally have less storage space for residents This facility will promote the general welfare of the surrounding area by meeting the increased demand for easy and convenient access to additional storage space The facility will also maintain and promote the public health and safety by limiting the negative impacts of traditional storage facilities The project will consist of class A self - storage facility , with the majority of the units within a fully enclosed climate controlled building The non - climate direct access units will be screened from the public streets to avoid visual impacts In addition , the facility will be managed by a best in class REIT manager The facility will not beopen for access 24 hours a day , but will be fully secured and monitored 24 hours a day Self - storage facilities are also inherently low impact because they generate less peak demand than traditional retail and restaurant uses , which have constant foot traffic throughout the day Therefore , this development will havea much smaller parking area and a much lower impact on the surrounding roads As a result , the proposed self - storage facility is compatible with the surrounding residential uses , and will provide nearby residents with easy and convenient access to alow impact neighborhood service 2 That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14 - 257 and with all applicable regulations ; Applicant The surrounding area is quickly developing with more dense residential uses , such as townhomes and apartments , which traditionally have less storage space for residents This facility will meet the increased demand for easy and convenient access to additional storage space The proposed self - service storage facility is also compatible with the surrounding residential area because it is designed to appearand operate as alow impact office use 3 That the use or development is located , designed , and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property , or that the use or development is a public necessity ; Applicant The proposed self - service storage facility is ideally located along a major corridor and will meet the increased demand for easy and convenient access to additional storage space The facility will also enhance the character of the neighborhood because is designed to appear and operate as a low impact office use , which is compatible with the surrounding area 4 That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County’s Planning jurisdiction , the Design Manual , or other development policies as adopted by the Board of Commissioners Applicant The property is within the RuralCrossroads Placetype on the Future Land Use & Conservation Plan Map Crossroads are the small concentrations of commercial uses in rural portions of the county Uses typically include convenience retail , food outlets , restaurants , fuel stations , agricultural support uses , etc The proposed self - service storage use is consistent with the uses recommended in this placetype by providing a needed neighborhood service in close proximity to nearby residential uses 15Page6Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information 1 Please Provide the purpose of the district , a project narrative , and a list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning district Applicant The purpose of the proposed General Business Conditional Zoning district is to allow the development of a self - service storage facility The facility will be ideally situated on Highway 42 in close proximity to Flowers Plantation and the substantial amount of residential development in the area As such , this facility will provide the nearby residents easy and convenient access to aneeded neighborhood service The Conditional Zoning district is limited to the mini - storage use and includes zoning conditions to ensure the facility will visually and operationally complement the character of the surrounding neighborhood The project will consist of 100k SF Class A self - storage There will be four total buildings Theprimary building will be80k SF of fully enclosed climate control storage The remaining buildings will be non - climate direct access units screened from public streets , filling a huge need in the community 2 Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district Within a Conditional Zoning District , additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have on the surrounding community and the environment Staff , the Planning Board , andBoard of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process Please list any conditions that you propose , as the applicant , below Applicant 1 Permitted uses shall be limited to Mini - Storage 2 Building height shall be limited to amaximum of 2 stories Conditions 1 Proposed uses Mini - Storage Proposed by Applicant 2 Building height shall be limited to a maximum of 2 stories Proposed by Applicant 3 The development shall conform to all requirements of the Johnston County Land Development Code 4 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Department Staff 5 A Class B 2 large trees , 3 small trees , and 9 shrubs every 100 linear feet landscape buffer shall be installed along all conditional zoning lines and must be placed outside of any fencing existing vegetation may be used 6 All signage shall comply with the Johnston County sign code 7 All structures must comply with all rules enforced by Federal , State , and Local agencies 16Page78 Secure an NCDOT driveway permit 9 Allowroom for stacking of vehicles 10 Road improvements will be required byNCDOT 11 Any lighting will be dark sky or down lighting so as not to shine onto adjacent properties RezoningCase 24 - 25 Rezoning Petition Agricultural Residential AR to General Business - Conditional Zoning GB - CZ Tax ID 16L02045O Owner Larry Davis Applicant Larry Davis Location 52 acres of a 92 acre tract located at 100 Davis Rd in the Wilders Township Conditional Zoning Request Commercial Truck and equipment parking Mr Sasser recused himself from Case 24 - 25 Upon a motion byMsHolmes to recuse Mr Sasser , seconded byMr Hudson , the recusal of Mr Sasser was approved by a unanimous vote of 7 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Mr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above Mr Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned Agricultural Residential and is currently in violation for commercial vehicle parking Mr Marr spoke about the surrounding land uses Mr Marr stated that the area is located within a “ Low Density Residential ” future land use Placetype on the County’s Envision Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plan Mr Marr stated that the subject property came in as a zoning complaint to the Planning and Zoning Office in June 2024 , for the violation of operating a commercial business in an Agricultural Residential zoning district and excessive noise from equipment being operated in the early morning hours Mr Larry Davis , 100 Davis Rd , Zebulon , NC , stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Davis stated that his office is located at 24 Vance St , Zebulon , NC , with fourteen employees and five trucks on the road Mr Davis stated that there are no structures on the subject property Mr Davis stated that trailers , wood , and rebar are on the property Mr Davis stated that there is no work on the subject property and he only goes to the property to load up material Mr Davis stated that the complaint report was legitimate Mr Davis stated that he has an easement to access the subject property and had dump trucks loaded with rock to put gravel on the road that leads to the subject property Mr Davis stated that no employees work at the subject property and that it is for bobcats , extra trucks , and trailers Mr Davis stated that his employees drive their work vehicles home and his office is in downtown Zebulon Mr Davis stated that he left the existing vegetation on the subject property after purchasing it and that the cleared area is not visible from the road Mr Davis stated that he mayworkon a work truck on the subject property Mr Little asked about a concrete pad on the subject property 17Page8Mr Davis responded that there is a 30 x 60 feet concrete pad on the subject property and he uses it to store the rebar on it Mr Davis stated that there is 1,800 square feet of impervious on the whole site Mr Davis stated that the only gravel added was to the easement road Chairman Letchworth asked Mr Davis if he had read the conditions in the staff report Mr Davis responded no Mr Davis reviewed the conditions and requested 10 trucks , 10 trailers , and 10 pieces of equipment Mr Davis discussed the trees on the subject property acting as a buffer Mr Lovering asked about hours of operation Mr Davis responded that there will be days when they may not be on the subject property at all and then other days when they do go to the subject property but are usually back before dark Mr Lovering asked what the hours of operation would be if a condition was needed Mr Davis responded possibly 6am - 6pm , unless a truck broke down and it needed to be towed back to the subject property Ms Davis asked if mixing concrete would occur on the subject property Mr Davis responded no and that they are not a mixer company Mr Davis stated that he orders concrete from a plant and then the plant delivers the concrete to the job Mr Davis stated that they will sometimes tie rebar at the subject property Mr Hudson asked if there was any activity on the subject property that generated dust Mr Davis responded no Mr Davis stated that dust was generated when maintaining the drive Chairman Letchworth asked about hours of operation Mr Davis responded 6am - 6pm , seven days a week Mr Phillip Davis , 2653 Huntsman Tr , Zebulon , NC , expressed concern for a nearby property with a pond Mr Davis spoke about the elevation change between the two properties and expressed concerns for chemicals , lubricants , oils , etc on the ground being washed down to the pond and requested a condition to limit maintenance operations and fueling Mr Tom Campbell , 161 Davis Rd , Zebulon , NC , a nearby property owner , spoke in opposition of the requested rezoning Mr Campbell expressed concerns for large trucks on the residential street and the possible impact on the neighbors 18Page9Ms Rebecca Gordon , 145 Davis Rd , Zebulon , NC , a nearby property owner , expressed concerns for noise pollution and concerns that work continues on the subject property while in violation MsHolmes asked staff about the surrounding land uses Mr Marr responded that everything in the area is zoned AR and used for residential and agricultural purposes Mr Marr stated that there is a property to the northeast that is zoned CB - SUD and used as a Bed & Breakfast , but staff is not sure if the Bed & Breakfast is operational There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staff recommendation of denial , based on the inconsistency with the Comprehensive LandUse Plan and the continued violation of property Mr Marr stated that staff also has concerns with the lack of conditions provided by applicant , possible problems with emergency access to the site , and the possibility of hazardous materials leaking or contaminating the ground on the site and or adjacent properties Staff Recommendation Denial Upon a motion by Ms Holmes to deny Rezoning Case 24 - 25 , seconded by Mr Little , Rezoning Case 24 - 25 was recommended for denial by a unanimous vote of 7 - 0 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Rezoning Case 24 - 25 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their December 2 , 2024 meeting Consistency Statement This request is not consistent with the Envision Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that it is in a Low Density Residential area and not in close proximity to any activity nodes It also conflicts with LU - 1 of the Envision Johnston Plan that recommends to “ Direct future growth toward the municipalities ” Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions 1 That the use or development is located , designed , and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the public health , safety , and general welfare ; Applicant The use and development of the rezoning area is located to minimize line of site view of stored pickup trucks , open and enclosed utility trailers , small equipment such as skid steers and mini excavators from neighbors and roadway vehicular traffic 2 That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14 - 257 and with all applicable regulations ; 19Page0Applicant Because the surrounding area is mostly wooded , secluded , agricultural or residential , the use of this secluded portion of my land to store my small equipment , utility trailers & trucks will not impact the surrounding area The small equipment stored is also used on the property to maintain all the property , access easement road & proper drainage 3 That the use or development is located , designed , and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property , or that the use or development is a public necessity ; Applicant I have cleaned up the entire property , built and maintained the access easement road and improved the overall appearance of said property andimproved roadside drainage at the entry of the access easement road along Davis Rd 4 That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County’s Planning jurisdiction , the Design Manual , or other development policies as adopted by the Board of Commissioners Applicant Everything stored is mobile and can easily be relocated within the property and most of the small equipmentand trailers are used on a daily basis Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information 1 Please Provide the purpose of the district , a project narrative , and a list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning district Applicant The rezoning area is to be used to store utility trailers , small equipment and light medium duty pick - ups trucks and miscellaneous site maintenance materials 2 Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district Within a Conditional Zoning District , additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have on the surrounding community and the environment Staff , the Planning Board , and Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the review process Please list any conditions that you propose , as the applicant , below Applicant No hazardous materials or chemicals to be stored Uphold surrounding area noise ordinances Conditions 1 Proposed uses Parking of commercial vehicles , work trucks , trailers , and construction equipment 2 Limited to 4 commercial trucks work trucks , 4 trailers , and 4 pieces of machinery mini excavators skid steers 3 The development shall conform to all requirements of the Johnston County Land Development Code 4 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Department Staff 20Page15 A Class B 2 large trees , 3 small trees , and 9 shrubs every 100 linear feet landscape buffer shall be installed along all conditional zoning lines and must be placed outside of any fencing existing vegetation may be used 6 All signage shall comply with the Johnston County sign code 7 All structures must comply with all rules enforced by Federal , State , and Local agencies 8 Any lighting will be dark sky or down lighting so as not to shine onto adjacent properties 9 Strict adherence to the Johnston County Noise ordinance must be followed 10 No operation of equipment trucks before dawn 11 No hazardous materials will be stored on site Proposed by Applicant 12 Access road must be paved through Right - of - way Required byNCDOT 13 Access road must be evaluated by Fire Marshal to verify it is at least 20 ’ wide for emergency vehicles 14 At time of development ? Stormwater permit required if 17,000 sf or more of impervious area will be added ? Property is in ESA and is limited to 12 impervious area without stormwater controls ? Erosion control permit required if an acre or more will be disturbed ? 401 404 Buffer permits will be required for the stream crossing ? Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if present as well as all jurisdictional features and buffers A buffer call may be necessary RezoningCase 24 - 26 Rezoning Petition Agricultural Residential AR to General Business - Conditional Zoning GB - CZ Tax ID 16K02032A Owner Anthony Antonia Wilkerson Applicant Jose Fernando Hernandez Location 151 acres of a 2901 acre tract located at 3441Wendell Rd in the Wilders Township Conditional Zoning Request TowTruck yard and mechanic shop Mr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above Mr Marr stated that the existing land use was zoned Agricultural Residential and used for those purposes Mr Marr spoke about the surrounding land uses Mr Marr stated that the area is located within a “ Low Density Residential ” future land use Placetype on the County’s Envision Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plan Mr Marr stated that the subject property came in as a zoning complaint to the Planning and Zoning Office in June 2023 , along with several other properties on this road , for the violation of operating a commercial business in an Agricultural Residential zoning district Mr Marr stated that the subject property is Lot 1 in the Windy Hill Subdivision MsHoward asked if it was the same subdivision as previous rezoning requests 21Page2Mr Marr responded yes and that the Applicant came before the Board within recent months with a rezoning request onNCHWY 231 Mr Fernando Hernandez , 3441 Wendell Rd , Wendell , NC , stated the particulars of the request and was present to answer any questions from the Board Mr Hernandez stated that he and his father operate a tow truck business and they just need a place where they can work Mr Hernandez stated that he lives in front of a salvage year that has existed for more than ten years Mr Hernandez presented an updated site plan to the Board Mr Hernandez discussed the location of the fire hydrant and access for a fire truck with a 60 x 70 feet fire truck turn - around Mr Hernandez stated that they moved the driveway and access from David Rd to Wendell Rd Mr Hernandez stated that he has already obtained the NCDOT permit Mr Hernandez presented to the Board a signed petition with members of the community in support of the requested rezoning Mr Hernandez also presented pictures to the Board of the subject property showing the vegetation , fencing , and screening Mr Hernandez stated that they do want to build a 26 x 60 feet shop and that the main office is the 8 x20 feet office trailer Mr Lovering asked if the petition was for approval Mr Hernandez responded yes and most everyone is in favor Mr Hernandez stated that they help maintain David Rd Mr Hernandez stated that they have support from the neighbors Mr Hernandez expressed consideration for noise with the hours of operation Mr Sasser asked about the number of tow trucks Mr Hernandez responded , one tow truck and one truck with a trailer Mr Sasser asked about the size of the tow truck Mr Hernandez responded 3,500 and that they tow regular vehicles and trucks Mr Hernandez stated that they do not tow commercial vehicles Mr Hernandez stated that they are trying to get on with Johnston County Police Department Mr Sasser asked if they were in the County’s rotation Mr Hernandez responded no , because you have to have an established place Ms Howard asked about the concrete driveway to the residence on the subject property and the proposed 20 x 30 feet apron Ms Howard asked if there was an existing driveway Mr Hernandez responded yes Mr Hernandez stated that the driveway is approved by NCDOT Ms Howard asked if it was approved byNCDOT without meeting the 500 feet driveway separation 22Page3Mr Hernandez responded yes Mr Hernandez stated that his driveway is very small and close to David Rd Mr Hernandez stated that he added a second driveway for entrance with his trailer Mr Hernandez spoke about the NCHWY 231 property and its concerns MsHoward asked if Mr Hernandez owned the subject property Mr Hernandez stated that he is buying the property from the current owner MsHoward asked if a business was run on the subject property before Mr Hernandez Mr Hernandez responded that he did not think so and that the previous person had storage containers on the property Ms Davis asked if NCDOT approved both driveways Mr Hernandez stated that one driveway was existing and NCDOT approved the second driveway for residential use and he is working with them for commercial approval discussing the apron and other requirements Mr Little spoke about NCDOT approving second driveways for a single family residence Chairman Letchworth asked if they are operating on - site now Mr Hernandez stated that they have shut down operations , but their stuff is still on - site Chairman Letchworth stated that there are a significant number of cars parked on the subject property according to aerials dating back to 2021 Mr Hernandez responded that they buy vehicles and go through a DMV process before throwing the car away Chairman Letchworth asked if he had been operating on the property as far back as 2021 Mr Hernandez responded yes Mr Hernandez was unaware of restrictions and zoning on the subject property when purchased Mr Hernandez stated that a DMV inspector had been on the subject property Mr Hernandez stated that they are installing buffers to keep to themselves MsHoward asked about the mechanic shop request Mr Hernandez responded that he wants to be able to workon the vehicles MsHoward asked about the proposed 30x60 feet building and about condition # 10 Ms Davis asked about the proposed hours of operation Mr Hernandez responded that the proposed hours of operation were sufficient 23Page4Mr Hudson asked about approval from the Fire Marshal’s Office Mr Hernandez responded that he had communicated with the Fire Marshal’s Office Mr Marr referenced conditions # 11 and # 12 Mr Sasser asked about the rotation with the police department and calls outside of the hours of operation Mr Hernandez requested that it be added to the hours of operation Ms Davis discussed possible hours of operation Chairman Letchworth asked Mr Hernandez about his preference for hours Mr Hernandez stated that he would choose not to get on the Johnston County rotation and keep the proposed hours of operation due to support from neighbors Ms Gabby Rubio , 416 David Rd , Wendell , NC , expressed support for the rezoning petition Ms Rubio also spoke about Mr Hernandez helping maintain the road There wasno further discussion Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staff recommendation of denial , based on the inconsistency with the Comprehensive LandUse Plan and the continued violation of property Also , this parcel is part of the Windy Hill Subdivision Mr Hudson spoke in appreciation of Mr Hernandez communicating with his neighbors Staff Recommendation Denial Upon a motion by Mr Hudson to approve Rezoning Case 24 - 26 , seconded by Ms Holmes , Rezoning Case 24 - 26 was recommended for approval by a vote of 7 - 1 at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting , with Mr Lovering dissenting Rezoning Case 24 - 25 will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners at their December 2 , 2024 meeting Consistency Statement This request is not consistent with the Envision Johnston Comprehensive Land Use Plan in that it is in a Low Density Residential area and not in close proximity to any activity nodes It also conflicts with LU - 1 of the Envision Johnston Plan that recommends to “ Direct future growth toward the municipalities ” Conditional Zoning Applicant Questions 24Page51 That the use or development is located , designed , and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the public health , safety , and general welfare ; Applicant The property is located on 3441 Wendell Rd will be maintained and promote public safety by offering a fence area within its required landscape buffer and screening that will have everything contained in it We will provide local towing services and repairs to the growing community following the rules and regulations of the county 2 That the use of the development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations of Articles II & IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14 - 257 and with all applicable regulations ; Applicant There are other zonings on this road classified from General Business , industrial , I1 I2 and GB We are asking for a chance to work out family business and be a help to the communityand by noticing other businesses around us that are zone similar , or are allowed to workunder the zoning laws A business like ours will not have the same amount of traffic in the community as other local businesses The shop will have its own driveway from the main road that it’s already in the process with DOT as seen on the site plan 3 That the use or development is located , designed , and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property , or that the use or development is a public necessity ; Applicant By working within our designated area and having our landscape buffers The impact on the neighborhood would be minimal and our business would be maintained within the zoned area 4 That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the County’s Planning jurisdiction , the Design Manual , or other development policies as adopted by the Board of Commissioners Applicant As residents of Johnston County for more than 10 years , being permitted to set up our family business here in Johnston County will help with services and maintain revenue within the county and surrounding areas With the fast growing community and the development of this county we will provide automotive services to the community Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information 1 Please Provide the purpose of the district , a project narrative , and a list of proposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning district Applicant The purpose of the rezoning wouldbea automotive repair shop towing yard 2 Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning district Within a Conditional Zoning District , additional conditions and requirements may be added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have on the surrounding community and the environment Staff , the Planning Board , andBoard of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during 25Page6the review process Please list any conditions that you propose , as the applicant , below Applicant Some of the conditions would be having a fenced area where the designated screening and landscape buffers prevent discomfort disturbance visually to the public All workwould be done within the designated shop and designated work area If business hours are neededandmandatoryM - F 8am - 7pm , Sat 8am - 1pm , Sun closed Conditions 1 Proposed uses Automotive repair shop Tow yard Proposed by applicant 2 Contain all repairs to inside of shop if possible Proposed by applicant 3 The development shall conform to all requirements of the Johnston County Land Development Code 4 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Department Staff 5 A Class B 2 large trees , 3 small trees , and 9 shrubs every 100 linear feet landscape buffer shall be installed along all conditional zoning lines and must be placed outside of any fencing existing vegetation may be used 6 All signage shall comply with the Johnston County sign code 7 All structures must comply with all rules enforced by Federal , State , and Local agencies 8 Any lighting will be dark sky or down lighting so as not to shine onto adjacent properties 9 Hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday 8am - 7pm , Saturday 8 am - 1pm Proposed by applicant 10 All vehicles and repair services will be performed and contained inside of the garage or an 8 ft opaque fence 11 Driveway must be able to hold 75,000 pounds Fire Marshal 12 Must Provide fire hydrant if one is not within required distance Fire Marshal 13 NCDOT Driveway permit required 14 Driveway must be paved through the Right - of - Way NCDOT Case TXT 24 - 02 Text Amendment Request Sect 14 - 89 Amend table to allow Multi - Family uses in the GB district not greater than 15 units per acre AND allow Townhome uses in the GB district not greater than 6 units per acre , such uses being allowed only as a Conditional Zoning CZ District and when consistent with the County’s adopted Land Use Plan and or considered appropriate by the County Commissioners Case TXT 24 - 02 was tabled until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting RezoningCase 24 - 27 Rezoning Petition Agricultural Residential AR to General Business - Conditional Zoning GB - CZ 26Page7Tax ID 06E02076 , 06E02015A , 06G05014 , & 06E02015 Owner Dorothy Hall , Joan & Glenwood Parrish & James Hall Applicant Patrick Riley Location 4328 acre tract located in the 11700 Block of Cleveland Rd in the Cleveland Township Conditional Zoning Request Commercial Flex space Case 24 - 27 was tabled until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting RezoningCase 24 - 28 Rezoning Petition General Business GB to General Business - Conditional Zoning GB - CZ Tax ID 06D01026R , 06D01026C Owner Catfish Real Estate , LLC Applicant Catfish Real Estate , LLC Location 19 acres of a 308 acre tract located in the 16000 Block of NCHWY 50 in the Cleveland Township Conditional Zoning Request Multi - Family Apartments Case 24 - 28 was tabled until the November 19 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting Discussion Items There were two written decisions for the Board’s review EvansRd Tract Owner Bennett Cherrie Farm Place , LLC Developer Bennett Cherrie Farm Place , LLC Surveyor Engineer Hall Land Surveying , Inc Acreage Lots 4513 acres , 27 lots Tax ID # 12O09038 & 12O09038W Address 1488 Evans Rd The Board reviewed the written decision Upon a motion by Mr Sasser to approve the written decision for Evans Rd Tract , seconded by Ms Holmes , and carried by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 , the written decision for Evans Rd Tract was approved as presented at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting River Wynd Owner Johnny P Weaver Jr & Tamar Weaver Developer Kirby Marshburn Building Corp Surveyor Engineer Sanderson Engineering Inc Acreage Lots 7725 acres , 60 lots Tax ID # 11N05057B Address 1418 Bluegrass Rd 27Page8The Board reviewed the written decision Upon a motion byMsHolmes to approve the written decision for River Wynd , seconded by Mr Hudson , and carried by a unanimous vote of 8 - 0 , the written decision for River Wyndwas approved as presented at the October 15 , 2024 Planning Board Meeting The meeting ended at 8 10 pm Respectfully submitted by _______________________________________ Jodie Gay , Secretary for the Board 28Page