April 16, 2019 - Planning Board Full Packet

JolmstonCounty Planning BoardApril 16, 2019-600 PMCommissioners Meeting Room-County CourthouseSmithfield, North Carolina1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE2 MOMENT OF SILENCE IN MEMORIUM OF WILLIAM STANTONMASSENGILL3 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTESFrom the March 19, 2019 Planning Board Meeting600pm {Subdivision Review4 SUBDIVISIONS Speakers to be Sworn In• ANN OD LLC 737 acres, 5 lots Eatmon Rd SR 1738 14°1 of a mile south ofCovered Bridge Rd in ONeals Township• Barbour Farms 811 acres, 66 lots US Highway 70 Business at Praed Ln inWilsons Mills Township• Brighton Glen 3094 acres, 27 lots Massengill Pond Rd SR 1313 just east ofits intersection with West Road in Pleasant Grove Township• Coventry Glen 3141 acres, 37 lots Friendship Church Rd SR 2102 betweenNC Highway 231 and Simon Rd in ONeals Township• Hannah C1·eek 1824 acres, 24 lots 1643 Hannah Creek Rd SR 1171 14°1 of amile south of Allens Crossroads Rd in Banner Township• Langdon Farms Phase II 41172 acres, 46 lots NC Hwy 210 just east ofLassiter Pond Rd in Smithfield Township• Mason Pointe West 1672 acres, 14 lots River Run Road at the southwestcorner of the intersection with Lowell Mill Rd in Micro Township• Tomlinson Tract 10436 acres, 85 lots Cleveland Rd SR 1010 betweenPolenta Rd and Momoe Rd in Cleveland Township• Tucker Tract 243 acres, 1 lot 314 Sweetbriar Rel in the Pleasant GroveTownship600pm or after Public HearingsS REZONING AND SPECIAL USE CASESCASE 565-MOD TABLED UNTIL MAY 21, 2019 MEETINGRezoning Petition Petition to rezone modify existing special use of 1166acres located at 3900 NC 210 Hwy And 526-684 County Home Rel inSmithfield Township from Industrial 2-Special Use District J-2 SUD,CLD to 1-2 Special Use District 1-2 SUDTax ID 15109033, 15109033B, 15l08028C, I 5l08026C, I 5108028,15109001Owner Johnston CountyApplicant Johnston CountySpecial Use Request All County facilities Request to apply the Special UsePermit to all parcels and modifycorrect the SUP related to setbacksCASE 19-08Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 19 acres of a 798 acre tract locatedat 3876 Benson Hardee Rd in the Batmer Township from AgriculturalResidential AR to General Business GBTax ID OIG12060DOwner E M Property Management LLCApplicant Evencio ZavaletaCASE 19-09Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 56 acres of a 3848 acre tractlocated at 3200 block of Lassiter Rd in the Elevation Township fromAgricultural Residential AR to Industrial 1 Special Use District I-1SUDTax ID 07F06040BOwner James Edna SmithApplicant Duke Energy Progress, LLCSpecial Use Open Storage- Temporary use until construction of transmissionline is complete Temporary use to be terminated prior to September 2021CASE 19-10Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 918 acres ofa 4771 acre tractlocated at 875 Landmark Rd in the Pleasant Grove Township fromAgricultural Residential AR to General Business- Special Use DistrictGB-SUDTax ID 13B01015AOwner James Amber GoldApplicant Dealer Lifts, IncSpecial Use Automotive Part Sales and Automotive Repair-MechanicalCASE 19-11Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 2668 acres located at 7305Cleveland Rd in the Cleveland Township from Agricultural ResidentialAR to Agricultural Residential- Special Use District AR-SUDTax ID 06F04 l 97Owner Michael RiccobeneApplicant Adams Hodge Engineering, PCSpecial Use Major Subdivision with sewer services6 DISCUSSION ITEMS7 INFORMATIONITEMSA Building Pe1mit TrendsB SubdivisionFee in Lieu StatsC Zoning Case SummaryD Monthly Activity Repo1tE Johnston County School Data8 NEXT MEETING May 21, 2019-Gpm9 ADJOURNMENTDRAFTMEETING OF THE JOHNSTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARDTuesday, March 19th, 2019 600 pmThe Johnston County Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, March 19th,20 I 9 at 600 pm in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Johnston CountyCourthouse Annex, Smithfield, NC with the following membersPresent Allen DeLaine, Scott Smith, Will Letchworth, Nicole Hackler, Russell Creech,Larry Massengill, Marcia Stewart, Rick Sapir, Tony Braswell BOCC RepAbsent Todd Man-, Planner; Adam CaldwellAlso present Braston Newton, Director; Jamie Beitel, Planner; Jennifor Slusser, CountyAttorneyMr DeLaine welcomed Marcia Stewart as a new board memberChairman DeLaine opened the meeting at 600 pm with the Pledge of Allegiance led byMs StewartMr Creech made a motion to approve the February 19th, 2019 Planning Board Minutes,seconded by Mr Sapir and carried by a unanimous vote of7-0Speakers were sworn inSubdivisionsThe Bluffs at Harvest Ridge SubdivisionOwner Crossroads Development, IncDeveloper Crossroads Development, IncSurveyor Stancil Associates, PLS, PAAcreageLots 15 908 acres, 23 lotsTax ID# 13D04035BLocation Prosperity Ct in the Harvest Ridge Subdivision off Old Fairground Rd inPleasant Grove TownshipMr Newton introduced the case and referenced the information listed above Heexplained that 78 lots were originally approved for Phase I but Lot number I and 62 wereskipped in the process and only 76 were recorded Those 76 lots combined with the lotsproposed today would bring the subdivision to 99 lotsMr Smith asked if anything had changed since the previous submittalMr Newton replied, no sirMr Michael Coats, 12400 NC 50 Hwy N, Willow Springs, stated they had been workingon this since 2005 when they stubbed the road out through Harvest Ridge Phase I Thelandowner was not ready to sell this property until 2011 and at that time, he continued, noone could buy anything They made a deal to buy the property last year in 2018 for thisportion He stated they have met with the homeowners of Harvest RidgeMr Paul Evaniak, I 60 Prosperity Court, President of the Harvest Ridge HOA, stated thatthere had been conversations with Mr Coats and there is an annexation agreement thatwas shared with them to which they have some concerns One of the concerns was withthe square footage of the homes being built, a compromise has been reached between thetwo, and it is 1500 sq ft minimum Mr Coats stated that the developer has agreed tothose terms as well, he stated The other change to the annexation agreement would bethat all the homes be built on slabs He continued that all the homes in Harvest Ridgemust be built on foundations The HOA is ok with this as long as the agreement statesthat this will only be for Phase II since there are lots still available in the original HarvestRidge He concluded that Mr Coats has met with homeowners, just last week andanswered some of their questions and concerns He states this is not a perfect agreementbut it is a compromise all patties are willing to move forward withMs Judy Schmidinger, 151 Abundant Ave, in Harvest Ridge, stated that she hasconcerns with the TIA study She understands this does not require one, however, shebelieves the board needs to consider the impacts of the trafficStaff recommendation is for preliminary approvalMr Smith asked about Condition # 13 concerning the kiosk He thought Harvest Ridgewas started before the postal service made the change to kiosksMr Newton explained the kiosk would have to be in this new sectionMr Coats replied it would be near the entrance and would be on the final platUpon a motion by Mr Letchworth to approve The Bluffs at Harvest Ridge Subdivi~ion,seconded by Mr Massengill, the Planning Board approved The Bluffs at Harvest RidgeSubdivision with a unanimous vote of7-0, at the March 19th, 2019 Planning BoardMeetingConclitions ancl Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications24 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for streetmaintenance OM Sec 7, L item 8I 0 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Fire Hydrant information and water flow must be shown12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d313 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization ofcluster box mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstrnct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for eachunapproved lot[NCDOT]15 A new NCDOT driveway permit and subdivision design approval must beobtained prior to construction since these lots were not included on previousDriveway Permit16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOTStandard Specifications for Roads and Strnctures, NCDOT Subdivision RoadsMinimum Constrnction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Accessto North Carolina Highways17 It will be detennined at the time the driveway permit application is submittedif any road improvements will be required18 Need Updated information for Old Fairground Rd Turn lanes may berequired[Public Utilities]19 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required20 Stonnwater Statement Required21 A reasonable impervious limit per lot should be provided3Caniage Creek Phase VI SubdivisionOwner Betty Love and SandersLetteny Limited PartnershipDeveloper CatTiage Creek, LLCSurveyor Adams Hodge Engineering, PCAcreageLots 8268 acres, 60 lotsTax ID# 06G06008F and 06H06005ALocation Cleveland Rd SR 10 IO 600 ft east of its intersection with Polenta Rd SR1330 in Cleveland TownshipMr Newton introduced the subdivision and referenced the infonnation listed above Hestated that a reverse frontage buffer is recommended along Cleveland Rd He added there isan additional 9 lots being requestedMr Letchworth asked if there were plans to increase capacity at the related schoolsMr Newton stated not that he is aware ofMr Smith asked about the SL lots along Cleveland RdMr Newton replied those were septic lotsMs Hackler wanted to go on record saying she was very concerned about the schoolcapacity in the areaMr James Lipscomb, 328 E Main St, Clayton, stated they are back in front of the boardbecause they have a better understanding of the septic rules for offaite lots He added thatdue to soils they were able to get a few extra lotsMr Smith stated he is concerned about the additional lots impacting Lot IO upfront He isconcerned about people trying to go left or right onto Cleveland Rd and the homes on thecorner and now on top of that adding these additional lots that will impact traffic flowMr Lipscomb replied there are improvements planned at that intersection as far as turnlanes in and out of the subdivision onto Cleveland Rd Mr Benton on Lot 9 has agreed toa landscape buffer so that it will minimize the impact for his propertyMs Hackler asked if that would be into the ROWMr Lipscomb replied no After conferring with Mr Coats, Mr Lipscomb stated that hewas mistaken The improvements along Cleveland Rd have already been complete Hewas thinking there would be more improvements on Carriage Creek Drive for wideningbut he was mistakenStaff recommendation is for preliminary approvalUpon a motion by Mr Letchworth made a motion to approve Carriage Creek Phase VISubdivision, seconded by Mr Sapir, with Mr Smith opposing, the Planning Board4approved Carriage Creek Phase VI Subdivision with a vote of 6-1 at the March 19th,2019 Planning Board MeetingConditions and RequirementsPlanningI Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide a 20 emergency access constrncted with an all-weather surface priorto recordation of the 100th lot within Carriage CreekI 0 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for streetmaintenance DM Sec 7, L item 811 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Cleveland Road12 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording13 Show to whom open space is dedicatedI 4 TIA Recommendations from October 2017a Caniage Creek Dr and Site Driveway1 NB Carriage CreekI Restripe Thru to ThruRightii SB Carriage Creek1 Restripe Thru to ThrnLeftiii EB Site Entrance# 11 Two Lane Cross Section one ingress, one egress2 Egress LeftRight Lane3 100 intemal protected stem15 Provide 20 fee simple access to open space16 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 317 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization ofcluster box mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health18 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for eachunapproved lot5[NCDOT]19 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction20 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOTStandard Specifications for Roads and Strnctures, NCDOT Subdivision RoadsMinimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Accessto North Carolina Highways21 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submittedif any road improvements will be required22 Provide temporary turnaround on lot 56 and 5723 Place a Hydrant on Street B to ensure 500 coverage[Public Utilities]24 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required25 Stormwater Compliance26 Approval of water system27 If the additional lots were not included in the initial permit, please provide arevision including any revised calculations due to the additional lotsJackson Springs SubdivisionOwner Joe Thomas EarpDeveloper Steel Bridge Crossing LLCSurveyor Red Line Engineering, PCAcreageLots 6245 acres, 62 lotsTax ID# 13B0I0I 7Location Jackson King Rd SR 1531 at the intersection with Landmark Rd in PleasantGrove TownshipMr Newton introduced the subdivision and referenced the information listed above Headded that a reverse frontage buffer would be required on all lots that back up to JacksonKing Rd and Landmark Rd He also noted that a portion of the floodplain appears on theparcelMr Smith asked about the stubout connection on Buck Ridge Lane and asked if there wasa requirement to tie into thatMr Newton replied there is nothing in the ordinance that mandates that but the board canrequire it He added that normally stubouts are for landlocked pieces ofprope1ty and he isnot sure why the developer had the stubout there since this is not landlockedMr Ga1y McCabe, 1401 Aversboro Rd, Garner, SurveyorEngineer, stated he would beglad to answer any questions He added that the street in question is not public and not statemaintained and that is the reason why they did not com1ect to it He continued that theyhave worked extensively with DOT and no turn lanes will be required They have also6worked with planning and public utilities staff to make sure cve1ything is by the ordinanceHe stated there is a pocket of wetlands but there is no buffer requiredMr Joshua Inscore, 212 Landmark Rd, stated that he was in favor of the subdivision butthe only concern he had was the entrance being right across the street from his home Hehas had conversations with the Surveyor and asked if they could move it over Hecontinued that he would like to have it moved further east down Landmark Rd if possibleMr McCabe stated that it depends on the soils They would be glad to look at it and havediscussions with DOT as wellMr Darren Mercer, 52 Buck Ridge Lane, stated that they like the dead end the way it isand this project will be in his backyard He understood they were not going to sell that landand he understands things change but he would like it to stay a dead endStaff recommendation is for preliminary approvalMr Letchworth asked if staff had any opposition to moving the entrance as long as it wasdone before the final platMr Newton replied 110 as long as the number oflots didnt changeUpon a motion by Ms Hackler made a motion to approve Jackson Springs Subdivision,seconded by Mr Letchworth, the Planning Board approved Jackson Springs Subdivisionwith a unanimous vote of 7-0 at the March 19th, 2019 Planning Board MeetingConditions and Requirements[Planningl Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for streetmaintenance DM Sec 7, L item 8I 0 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Jackson King Rd and Landmark Rd11 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording12 Show to whom open space is dedicated13 Per Emergency Services, Provide water flows and Hydrant Information14 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 3715 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization ofcluster box mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstmct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]16 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for eachunapproved lot[NCDOT]17 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstmction18 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOTStandard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision RoadsMinimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Accessto Nmih Carolina Highways19 lt will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submittedif any road improvements will be required[Public Utilities]20 Stonnwater Statement Required21 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required22 Potential Buffer located on property not shown on plan-Buffer Call will needto be completed if not done so already or the buffer will need to be shown onthe plan Provide buffer call with plan submittalMaggie Way SubdivisionOwner Marilyn Faye Martin Smith Carole Branch Martin LloydDeveloper Sams Branch II, LLCSurveyor Adams Hodge Engineering, PCAcreageLots 308 l 7acres, 3 I 8 lotsTax ID# 16J0101 lLocation I 023 Maggie Way SR 1717 off Buffalo Rd in Wilders TownshipMr Newton introduced the subdivision and referenced the infonnation listed above Headded that a reverse frontage buffer would be required for proposed lots on Maggie WayIn addition, a portion of floodplain appears on this parcel He stated the board has seen thissubdivision before them in previous monthsMr Letchworth asked how many lots were included when it came before the board before8Mr Newton replied that he did not know exactly but it was close to the same numberMs Hackler asked when the boards packets are prepared for themMr Newton stated a week in advance, just a day before they are delivered to the boardMs Hackler asked if staff just received the TIAMr Newton replied it was from the previous month and he printed that for Ms Stewartsbenefit It is an addendum to the original TIAMs Stewart stated she had a question on the school districts and the numbers She asked ifthe numbers include all the other building going on as well or are the numbers cutlentenrollmentsMr Newton replied they are current enrollmentsMs Stewart asked how could the board get a good handle on that and make an appropriatedecision without the knowledge of other building going on in the same areaMr Newton stated that was a valid concern and the issue has been brought up numeroustimes, however, staff does not have control over the school systemsMs Stewart interjected that she knows staff does not have control over them but the boardneeds to know how many subdivisions are in the works in the same areas so they have abetter understanding of the capacity issuesMr Newton stated staff could do that and add the numbers on the staffrepottMr Creech asked what determines what the board can approve or turn downMr Newton replied there are ce1tain development c1iteria in the Land Development Codebut to preface that, it does state adequate facilities as a purpose and intent so there is somesubjectivity in regards to that He stated that is the gray area and not the black and whiteMs Hackler stated that the Commissioners are aware that this is a concern of theirs andstaff has heard these complaints from them for monthsMs Stewmt asked why have the numbers if there isnt an option of turning somethingdownMs Hacker replied that they had asked that question many timesMs Slusser stated that if the proposal meets the standards in the ordinance then you have tofind reasons within the ordinance where you can turn it down School capacity is not astandard in the ordinance in which you can make a determination9Mr Letchworth refe1Tcd to the report in the back of the packet and how those numbers areimpacting schools, especially with the large number of lots as this one isMs Stewart stated that she believes the ordinance needs to be changed There isnt a needfor staff to go to extra work and get all these numbers if the board cant use them to turnthings downMr Newton stated staff is working on some ordinance amendments that are forthcomingMr Massengill stated that he believes the timing is the issue and so many coming forwardall at once it seems The projects themselves can take years to develop He understands thatthe schools use these numbers for projectionMs Stewmt stated that she believes it will take a lot longer to build schools than to buildthese subdivisionsMr Massengill replied that is probably c01Tect depending on the market economyMr Letchworth stated that the intent of the subdivision ordinance is the main concernMr Smith asked when the latest school generation numbers were completedMr Newton replied October He went on to explain the second entrance and trafficimprovementsMs Stewmt asked when the TIA was completedMr Newton stated it was provided at the last meeting and the addendum was placed at yourseats for this eveningMr Lipscomb, spoke on behalf of the Surveyor, and introduced the team he had present atthe meeting Donnie Adams and Steve Green with Ramey Kemp He wanted the board toknow they have done their due diligence and tried to answer all the questions the board hadfrom the previous meetingThere was a powerpoint presentation to the boardMr Donnie Adams, Engineer, 314 E Main St, Clayton, explained the area, the nearbyVADs, the locations of the schools in the area and explained the wetlands and riparianbuffers at the back of the prope1ty and what they have done to coTect some previousissues He went through the slides of the powerpoint and explained what they have changedsince the board denied the request last timeMr Steve Green, Ramey Kemp and Associates, Engineer, explained the TIA and thechangesimprovements He described the turn lanes and where they would be as well as theintersection changes with signals or changes to existing signalsIOMr Letchworth asked about the email to Braston on Feb 8th concerning the improvementsat Maggie Way and Buffalo RdMr Green replied there is an existing church, cemetery and a house at that intersection andDOT is requiring design plans for all the improvements as far as the ROW They have notentered into any plans at this time, he statedMr Letchworth stated that Maggie Way to him is a winding, substandard, rnral counttyroad Pavement condition is bad and many potholes, he added He asked ifthcy had madean assessment on Maggie Way itselfMr Green replied he is not aware of any improvements to be made since the traffic count islow on that roadMr Adams discussed the environmental plans as far as the crossings of buffers andstreams They do not foresee any issues with pennitting to cross them but he feels it willdig deep into the developers pocket He proceeded with the slides to explain the phases ofthe subdivision and the density He explained that this will be phased out over a 7 yearperiod Instead of an immediate issue with you approving a 30-40 lot subdivision and itgoes on the ground immediately, he explained, this subdivision will give the schools timeto project out for yearsMs Stewart asked what held them to that timeframeMr Lipscomb responded that is their best professional estimate of timeframe It is a targettime frameThere was brief discussion on the phases and why they are not combined into fewer phasesMr Adams stated that the first three phases would probably be done at the same time butrecorded in separate phasesMr Letchworth is concerned that if this is approved that the improvements at Buffalo Rdwill go awayMr Lipscomb discussed the idea of using curb and gutter as to not disturb too much of theROW since there isnt a lot of ROW there to deal with He added they have spoken withsomeone from the church and they stated they are out ofland and already sit so near theroad as does the cemeteryMs Stewart stated that she is confused with the recommendations that are from DOT Shewants to know which ones the applicant is agreeing to do or which are required for them todoMr Newton clarified the recommendations from the last meetingMs Stewart asked why they cant consider this in smaller phases11Mr Lipscomb replied that the contract states they had to buy the entire piece ofland andthat is the biggest reasonMr Adams walked the board through what DOT was requiring and what was planned Heconcluded by asking the board to please give them the right to rebuttal if there were furtherconcernsThe board agreedMr Herbe11 Case, 16750 Buffalo Rd, stated that he lives directly across the road from thissite and hes opposed due to the size ofit He discussed the subdivisions that have beenapproved in the past that are in the same area and stated the article on WTSB regardinghow many subdivisions have been approved this year He stated the county didnt need anymore, especially of this size Any improvements that will have to be done to the ROW willimpact him and his daughters homes He continued that the shoulders and drainage onMaggie Way were already bad and he added that he was looking forward to the wideningof Buffalo Rd one day so DOT would buy him out DOT is reactive, he stated He hasconcerns with schools, wetlands, septic, water service and traffic, he concluded Growth isnot bad as long as its controlledMr Michael Tant, 1656 Lake Wendell Rd, referenced the construction damage to MaggieWay that will result, as has been done on Wall Rd He attends Clydes Chapel Church,which is on the comer, and the cemete1y is on the other comer He stated that there areaccidents already in that area and some stones in the cemetery have been damaged in thepast He also has concerns with the schools and the overcrowding He referenced impactfees and how they may be needed in the future if these subdivisions continue to beapprovedStaff recommendation is for denial, due to not having updated TIA at the time of packetdistributionMs Stewart stated that this is irresponsible given the impactUpon a motion by Ms Stewart made a motion to deny Maggie Way Subdivision,seconded by Ms Hackler, with Mr Creech, Mr Sapir and Mr Massengill in favor, thePlanning Board denied Maggie Way Subdivision with a vote of 4-3 at the March 19th,2019 Planning Board MeetingThere was a short breakMason Pointe Subdivision was withdrawn from tonights meeting12Harris Wilson Rd SubdivisionOwner MHB Development, LLCDeveloper MHB Development, LLCSurveyor Bass, Nixon, and Kennedy, IncAcreageLots l 890 acres, 18 lotsTax ID# l6L02047MLocation Harris Wilson Rd SR 1725 just north of its intersection with Russell Dr inWilders TownshipMr Newton introduced the subdivision and referenced the information listed above Headded that the floodplain appears on a portion of this parcelMr Smith asked about the stubout in the subdivision to the southMr Newton stated it depends on if it is a public right of way or dedicated to DOT as towhether they can tic into itMr Mike Morrison, MHB Development, OwnerDeveloper, stated he would be glad toanswer any questions the board may have He added the stubout was never approved andthere is nothing actually thereThere was brief discussion on a buffer to the northMr Brnce Halpern, 201 Russell Drive, 331 feet from the proposed subdivision, stated thathe has a concern with living in the suburbs He quoted from the Comprehensive Land UsePlan concerning locations of the countryside for subdivisions and he does not feel there isenough infonnation on the green space or open space He also has concerns with flooding,water flow areas and schools and overcrowding He would like to see the area aroundCattail Creek protected, he concludedMs Hackler stated that the developer is not using the entire amount that he could use andthe board appreciates that They could have done 29 lots but they are only requesting 18,she addedThere was discussion by the board on ROW dedication areaStaff recommendation is for preliminmy approvalUpon a motion by Mr Letchworth to approve Harris Wilson Rd Subdivision, secondedby Ms Hackler, with Ms Stewart opposing, the Planning Board approved Harris WilsonRd Subdivision with a vote of 6-1 at the March 19th, 2019 Planning Board Meeting13Conditions and RequirementsPlanning]l Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for streetmaintenance OM Sec 7, L item 810 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Show to whom open space is dedicated12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d313 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization ofcluster box mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstrnct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for eachunapproved lotNCDOT]15 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOTStandard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision RoadsMinimum Constrnction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Accessto N01th Carolina Highways17 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submittedif any road improvements will be required[Public Utilities]18 Stormwater Statement Required19 Stormwater Erosion Control Permit Required20 Property is located within the ESA and limited to 12 impervious areawithout stonnwater management14David Wood SubdivisionOwner David and Jessica WoodDeveloper Asset Development INCSmveyor Stewart-Proctor PLLCAcreageLots 20I acres, 2 lotsTax ID# I 3C04017ELocation Massengill Pond Road SR 1313 directly northwest of its intersection withPleasant Pine Drive in Pleasant Grove TownshipMr Newton introdnced the subdivision and referenced the information listed above Headded this is a major subdivision because three lots have been previously cut out as a minorin this tract, which puts these lots into the major categmyMr Smith asked about the planned drivewayMr Newton explained the 500 driveway separation and the shared drivewayrequirementMr Allen Thornton, 351 Lassiter Pond Rd, Four Oaks, was present to answer anyquestionsMr Smith asked if he understood the driveway separation miesMr Thornton replied that he did but the two lots beside this parcel do not have the 500separation and the layout of the lot makes it high on the right and the left, which wouldput the garages in the low part of the lot Soils may also affect thisMr Smith asked where he would suggest putting the drivewaysMr Thornton stated they always try to put them on the high sideMr Smith asked if the other two lots beside of this had been constructedMr Thornton replied they are about to statt construction on them He added they wereapproved as a minor subdivisionMr Smith asked why those lots were required to do the separationMr Newton replied because they were minors and the separation was only required formajor subdivisionsThere was brief discussion by the board on where to put the driveways and the sightdistance issuesStaff recommendation is for preliminaty approvalMr Letchworth slated there would be four driveways in 600 if this allowed and he hasissue with that wondering why have an ordinance15Mr Massengill was not sure that one driveway makes a differenceMr Letchworth feels it is a precedentUpon a motion by Mr Sapir to approve David Wood Subdivision striking items 9 and 10under the conditions, seconded by Mr Massengill, with Mr Letchworth, Ms Hackler,Ms Stewatt and Mr Smith in opposition, the Planning Board denied Danny WoodSubdivision with a vote of 3-4 at the March 19th, 2019 Planning Board MeetingRezoningsCase 565 Modification - Inclustlial 2 Special Use District 1-2 SUD, CLD to 1-2Special Use District 1-2 SUDOwner Johnston CountyApplicant Johnston CountyAcreage I 166Tax ID# 15109033, 15109033B, l 508028C, I 5108026C, 1508028, 15109001Location 3900 NC Hwy 210 and 526-684 County Home Rd in Smithfield TownshipSpecial Use All County Facilities; Request to apply the Special Use Permit to all parcelsand modifycorrect the SUP related to setbacksMr Newton introduced the case and referenced the infonnation listed above Heexplained the modification stating the proposed setback request of 300 from the edge ofWaste along the property boundaries and an 800 setback from the edge of Waste alongthe right-of-way ofNC 210 and 50 and 100 structure setbacksMs Chandra Farmer, Public Utilities Director for Johnston County, stated they arewishing to modify the setback She explained the original request in 2001 and how itplanned for a 250 for landfill operations and an 800 buffer was originally approved onNC 210 However, when the special use permit was recorded it was recorded with 800buffer surrounding the entire property, which significantly reduces the useable area of thelandfill It may not have been the intent of those original approvals, she added She wenton to explain the Countys near-term and long-term plans for the landfill and for wastewater treatment plant operationsMs Hackler about the existing special use conditionsMs Farmer stated that conditions 2-5 would not change with this new requestMr Smith asked about the subdivision recently approved on the comer of County HomeRd and NC 210 He was concerned how far back that development went towards thecreekMr Newton stated it was highlighted in their packetsMr Smith asked if there was a projection on when the landfill would be used up16Mr Rick Proctor, Solid Waste Manager, replied the landfill started in 1973 and as oftoday they are working on an 80 year plan that is subject to state approval, pennitting andconstruction He added this was a targetMr Smith stated, so there is potentially 80 years left before it is used upMr Proctor replied, hopefully, yes sirMr Massengill asked about the wastewater rnnoff and if it was from the containmentareaMs Fanner explained the leech ponds and how it is pumped to the wastewater treatmentplant and the expansion site In 2016, the current site flooded with Hurricane MatthewShe added they would like to get it out of harms way and start an expansion in an areathat is not in the floodplainMr Donald Norris, 329 County Home Rd, stated that he opposed this request becausethe new wastewater facility they are looking to build will be directly in front of his houseHe would like to see 800 buffer if the ones along NC 210 have 800Mr George Poke, NC Hwy 210, explained the lines and how it is pumped now and statedhe does not understand the need for a new treatment plant next to residential housing Headded he had EPA maps from the state and he wanted answers on how close this could beto a residential homeMs Farmer stated that she is not sure that EPA has any regulations on a setback fromhomes but she would be glad to look into thatMr Poke stated that you cant cover up the stink from a facility like thatMr Ken Jordan, 246 Lake Magnolia Way, stated that he built his home 2 years ago andwas under the assumption that he had an 800 buffer between him and the landfill Headded with the noise and the smell that 300 is not sufficient The overall quality of lifewill go down, he concludedMr Mark Baker, 230 Lake Magnolia Way, stated that he understood the 800 buffer andaccepted it He added there is some smell most days and he is concerned about homevalues being devalued He works from home most days and hears all the trucks backingup constantly He concluded that he would not have bought the house if it was at 300,that is too closeMr Bob Ross, 628 Lake Magnolia Way, representing the HOA of Lake Magnolia, statedthat all the homeowners bought their properties with the knowledge of 800 buffer backin 2007-2008 and he would like to see it remain as it was when they purchased itMr David HatTis, 296 Lake Magnolia Way, stated that he was a career naval officer andwhen he retired he had his pick of living anywhere in the world He did his due diligence17and decided upon Johnston County and he built this subdivision on a lake so his daughtercould water ski He sold all the lots to the people that have spoken in opposition Hetalked with developers and engineers and spent a lot of money to get this subdivisionbuilt They made the investment with the understanding there was an 800 buffer He hasa speck house now in this subdivision that lists for 750,000, which he will have todisclose and it will devalue this property He understands there needs to be a landfill inJohnston County but the same precedent should be allowed here as they are for homesalong NC 210 He is also concerned with the water quality for the lake He wants to alsomention that the letter that was sent out was extremely misleading in that there is noinformation telling homeowners what was going on He was also caught off guard by thePlanning staff when he went to ask to see a zoning map and was shown a map with a250 buffer He added that was an uncomfortable discussion as they had to ask, wasntthere more to this, and he didnt feel this was representative to the discussions he has hadin the past with the countyMr Newton inte1jected that there wasnt a current mapMr Stewart asked if Mr Harris had information on other neighborhoods such as his thatwould be affected as wellMr Harris stated that the ones to the north would be in the floodplainThere was brief discussion between Mr Harris and Ms Stewart about the special usepermit and the setbacks that were provided to the potential residents before they boughttheir properties and the views of the landfill from the propertiesMr Rick Hester, County Manager, asked for the board to table the request until there wassufficient time to meet with the neighborsUpon a motion by Ms Stewart to table Rezoning Case 565 Modification, seconded byMr Smith, the Planning Board tabled Rezoning Case 565 Modification with a unanimousvote of 7-0 at the March 19th, 2019 Planning Board MeetingCase 19-05 - Rezoning Petition- Special Use Permit - Agricnltnral Residential ARto Agricultural Residential - Special Use District AR-SUDOwner William Herny Ford Spouse Ford Meadows, LLCApplicant Steel Bridge Crossing, LLCAcreage 12942 acresTax ID# 05E01007C, 06E02022Location 4150 NC Highway 42 West in Cleveland TownshipSpecial Use To allow for a Planned Development-HousingMr Newton introdnced the case and referenced the information listed above He added thatthe applicant is requesting 193 lots, 108 single-family homes and 85 townhomes Heconcluded they would be connecting to sewer if approved18Mr Jeny Dalton, Dalton Engineering, explained the sewer line and stated it was beingused as sewer expansion He added there had been numerous discussions with large tractproperty owners out there and in total it would be around 600 acres He described theTIA and revisions and DOT told them since they were widening NC 42, there wasnothing they could do to harm the situation as it is right now or help the improvementsThey are looking at a right in only so not to cause more congestion on NC 42, hecontinued He described more sites in the same area they have been involved with andthere are more townhomes coming since that is a popular item these days, he stated Hecontinued that there is a need for townhomes in this area and he feels its consistent withthe UDOMr DeLaine asked about the TIA and how it affects the number of lotsMr Dalton replied they were told by DOT that there was nothing they could do thatwould cause a negative impact on what they are planning with the widening That hasbeen expressed to staff as wellMr Letchworth explained how TIAs are generated and added that this is similar to onesthat have been done in the pastMr Smith asked about the floodplain to the southMr Dalton described the density would be placed above the floodplainMr Smith asked about the amenities that are a part of a PUDMr Dalton stated that was discussed but there is no requirement for the rezoning portionMr Letchworth asked how much of the prope1ty he would be developing that was not inthe floodplainMr Dalton responded approximately 50-60 acresMs Stewart stated that was not I ½ units per acreMr Dalton explained how it is has calculated He said this is by no means the smallestlots he is dealing with; he has been doing more in the Town of Clayton that are smallerthan thisMs Kirsten Messmer, 7105 Kasey Dee Circle, Garner, has concerns with flooding andwetlands She is also concerned with the environmental and federal protection of speciesMr Rebel Coombes, 2076 Sherry Lynn Drive, Garner, stated that the bridge there hasflooded and floods often and even after the repairs were made to it The community didnot think anything could be built there because of the environmental species and theflooding He added that he is concerned about the public safety as well since the EMSwould be overloaded19Staff recommendation is for denial based on not having a TIA submitted by the time thepacket was generatedMr Smith asked about the mussels and other species and wondered if these are listed inthe reportMr Newton replied he was aware of the environmental document but he was not sure ifthat was included in it He stated he would be glad to check on thatMr Massengill stated that normally there are signs posted for the environmentallysensitive areasMr Letchworth asked about the homes per acre with septicMr Newton responded just slightly less than oneUpon a motion by Mr Creech to approve Rezoning Case 19-05, seconded by MrMassengill, with Ms Hackler, Mr Letchworth and Ms Stewartopposing Rezoning Case 19-05 was approved by a vote of 4-3 at the March 1911 2019Planning Board MeetingMr Newton read the Special Use Conditions He would like housing only to be addedto Condition #1 since that is what they were requesting He explained the two differentPUD rezoning districts where one is with commercial and one is housing onlyMr Dalton discussed the environmental protection area and added they would meet allrequired county, state and federal requirements He added that they would not affectflooding on the bridge He added this is a better situation with sewer than it would bewith septics as septics are what contaminates the wells and groundwaterMr Smith asked if a sediment pond was requiredMr Dalton replied no, a retention pond is not required They plan to meet all the rulesthat are requiredMr Smith stated that there are no amenities being developed, no pool, parks orplaygrounds and this would enhance the livabilityMr Dalton replied that it is not large enough for a pool, normally that is with 200-250lots He mentioned a tot lot could be built in the upper floodplain areaMs Stewart has concerns with traffic as well as school capacityMr Dalton stated that this project is consistent with other lots in this area and at theintersection20Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Conditions with the amendment toCondition # 1 as previously statedMs Stewart reiterated that this is irresponsibleUpon a motion by Mr Creech to approve the Special Use Conditions for Rezoning Case19-05, seconded by Mr Massengill, with Ms Hackler, Ms Stewart, Mr Letchworth, MrSmith and Mr Sapir opposing, the Planning Board denied the Special Use Conditions forRezoning Case 19-05 with a vote of 2-5 at the March I 9th, 2019 Planning BoardMeetingCase 19-07 - Rezoning Petition - Industrial 2-Special Use District I-2 SUD toAgricultural Residential AROwner Charles Bryan DenningApplicant Charles Bryan DenningAcreage 1858 acresTax ID# 090150030Location 1144 Lee Johnson Rd in the Meadow TownshipMr Newton introduced the case and referenced the information listed above He added thatthis was a down zoningMr Jared Barefoot, 3882 Holly Grove Rd, Dunn, stated that he is representing hisgrandmother and they are opposed to the site He added the site was formally a sand pit andit is unsafe There are insurance concerns with trespassing and crime, he stated They havebeen broken into more than once Safety is the biggest concern He concluded that if it iszoned residential and more people are allowed to live there then that would cause moresafety issuesMr B1yan Denning, ApplicantOwner, 1390 NC Hwy 55, Dunn, stated that the intent wasto rezone for the purpose to sell it to a single person since the pit is no longer there He isnot sure if they will build or develop it in the foture It is a desirable area and they willnot sell the property, of course, until it is rezonedMr Massengill asked if the mining operation was permitted by the state If so, then partof that is the clean up afterMr Denning stated that the part where the lake is located does not require reclamationMr Smith asked if he owned the parcel to the north, the remainderMr Denning replied noMr Smith asked if there was a buffer requirement for agriculturalMr Newton replied no, that is only for commercial operations21There was no further discussionStaff recommendation is for preliminary approvalUpon a motion by Mr Letchworth to approve Rezoning Case 19-07, seconded by MsHackler, Rezoning Case 19-07 was approved by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at the Marcht 9°, 2019 Planning Board MeetingMeeting ended at 1010 pmRespectfully submitted byStephanie Richter, Secretary to the Board22ANNODLLCOwnel ANNOD LLCDevclopct ANNOD LLCSulvcyol Alsey J Gilbelt, PLSTax ID# 11L030170Locational Data Eatmon Rd SR 1738 I4th ofa mile south of Covered Bridge Rd in ONealsTownship The proposed subdivision is served by the Corinth-Holders Fire District and the ClaytonRescue SquadSite Data 737 acres, 5 lots, maximum allowable density 11, water service shall be provided bywells and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided fee-in-lieu, open spacerequired 2,000, traffic count not available, property owners notified 5Additional Infolmationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 067 Therefore, ANNOD LLCSubdivision will generate approximately 4 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl IC IiO I I owmg I S b ase d on t I1 e O U t -0 f-C apac1 ty T a bl e prov1 d e dblV OREODistrict Caoacitv E11rollme11tCorinth Holders ES I Mobile Classroom 550 612Archer Lodge MS IO Mobile Classrooms 886 1164Corinth Holders HS 13 Mobile Classrooms 1200 1938• CTP This p01tion of Eatmon Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan asneeding improvement• E11viro11111e11tt1ly Semitive District This parcel is within the ESA, however no floodplainappears on the parcel• Direct Drivewt1y t1ccess 011 Eatmon R,l Major subdivisions to be located on a local roadshall be so designed that there shall be no more than one direct residential drivewayconnection per 500 feet along the same side of the local road, unless it can bedemonstrated that the proposed subdivision cannot be physically designed, that noreasonable alternative exists, or it would create an unreasonable hardship without acorresponding public benefit to prohibit individual driveway access onto a local roadAlso, from Jol111sto11 Co la11d desigt1 ma1111al4 + Lots Developments creating 4 or more lots1 Where no casement exists, and where the parent tracts have direct road frontage,an easement shall not be allowed The development must dedicate a right-of-waymeeting the requirements of this sectionA JJJaiver 1J1ay he aloJJJed if deten11i11ed by the P01111i11g Bomd that, i11 p1m11it of this sedio11, ahmdship is mated 11po11 the pmperty that pmvides 110 benefit to the safety, JJJelfm,, a11d q11ality oflije ofthe p11hitStaff Recommendation Denial, Due to direct driveway access 011 Ea111011 RdConditions and Requilements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Ce11ifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee6 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce11ificate for street maintenance OM Sec7, L item 87 Show shared driveway access easement and provide statement for shared maintenance onFinal Plat8 Driveways shall be separated 500 feet apart9 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recordingI 0 Show to whom open space is dedicated11 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d312 Provide adequate access for Emergency vehicles to lot 513 Provide water supply and hydrant placement information to Fire Marshal14 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]15 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to No11h CarolinaHighways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required[Public Utilities]19 Property is located within the ESA and is limited to 12 impervious area withoutstormwater management20 If over an acre is to be disturbed cumulatively, an erosion control permit will be required21 If 17,000 SF or greater of impervious area is intended to be added cumulatively, astormwater permit will be required•_, DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 13267 1 in 27225 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISApril 2, 2019l~Barbour Farms SubdivisionOwnel NDS Land DeveloJJmcnt, LLCDeveloJJel NDS Land DevcloJJment, LLCSnlveyol McGill Associates, PATax ID# 17J07033E, 17J07033G, 17J07033H, 17J07033I, 17J07033J, 17J07033K,17J07038, 17J07038B, 17J07038D, 17J07038ELocational Data US Highway 70 Business at Praed Ln in Wilsons Mills Township The proposedsubdivision is served by the Wilsons Mills Fire District and Rescue SquadSite Data 81 I acres, 66 lots, maximum allowable density 121, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided129 acres, open space required 81 acres, traffic count 15,000 vpd, prope1ty owners notified 17Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 047 Therefore, BarbourFarms Subdivision will generate approximately 31 K-12 students split amongst thethree schools below0 Tl JC ~O II ow111g IS b ase d on tI J e O ut-o f -C aoac1 tv T a bl e prov, de dby OREODistrict Caoacitv E11rollme11tWilsons Mills ES 625 548Swift Creek MS 800 623Smithfield HS 1350 1306• CTP This po1tion of US Highway 70 Business appears on the Comprehensive Transpo1tationPlan as an existing boulevard with adequate design capacityStaff Recommendation PreliminmJ approval subject to the following conditions and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]1 Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Cettificate for street maintenance OM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recordingI I Show to whom open space is dedicated12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 313 Provide temporary turnarounds between lots 4445 and 636414 Provide water supply and hydrant placement information15 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]16 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]17 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction18 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structmes, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to No1th CarolinaHighways19 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required[Public Utilities]20 Stormwater Statement Required21 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required22 Potential buffer located on prope1ty not shown on plan including around the pond- Buffercall will need to be completed if not done so already or the buffer will need to be shownon the plan Provide buffer call with plan submittal23 A reasonable impervious limit per lot should be provided24 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present~~ DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 13068 1 in 108901 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISApril 2, 2019@-0 ~fi oii;o ei~ [~om 3 C•~•~•g• i • •i If 1~1 ~l J,} li i ti •, ,, lo i I,,JI ·1• 1, i •PRELIMINARY PLAT,,a,,1W1c,,ov,,,-;•lOE0-c00 WIc,,;,e,,M; oe•a~,,,~,;,,,s,--, ,, - ~~1I -j_,Jinn II g i ntn n unsnn H u~ann ~ nnn ~g~~u 2n~ I~1+++++++++---Wl+--1-l-l-++++++++---Wl+l+++++++++++-+tt-i--tt-t-t-t-t---Hrl~~ ~t~~i~iiiittt It iii;~~~;;~ Siji~iliiiiiSint~n t~ ~~ 1111 l _i I~~-~~ g I 11 ~; ~ i It I I; i 11 iii s s; ~II~ I~ l 11 l __ i {II--0---BARBOUR FARMS SUBDIVISION ~MrcQillJOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAHN O NB BR TN G, PlANNING• Fl NAN CB on,»rn,, Jn-m1 ,,unnnnsdi++++++++~ ~~nHn~~dinnnn~ndi IPRELIMINARY PLAT~~0C?§ 5 c ,ma• zj•gmose00z~0 m00 ,,,c,,~,,U-fE OWff1lce;aElllftCOc,roa,,,_,- nL-I•-,- I L• ~I;s t·t;, z 5 ,i, , ~-I 0~~~ am ~ t mZ g a~~~~~ zo Omoo ,-+ 2o~fgfi1 ~ 0--1 z _~rl i,,- -1c cti,cy,;BARBOUR FARMS SUBDIVISIONJOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINABrighton GlenOwner Object Properties LLCDeveloper Object Properties LLCSurveyor Alsey J Gilbert, PLSTax ID# 13C04017BLocational Data Massengill Pond Rd SR 1313 just east of its intersection with West Road inPleasant Grove Township The proposed subdivision is served by the West Johnston Fire District andthe 50210 Rescue SquadSite Data 3094 acres, 27 lots, maximum allowable density 46, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required I 0,800, traffic count 1500 vpd, prope1ty owners notified 15Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 067 Therefore, Brighton GlenSubdivision will generate approximately 18 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 TIi e fo II owmg 1 s ba se d on t 1e Out-o f -Capacity Ta bl e provid e d b,y OREDDistrict Ca11acit1• EnrollmentBenson ES 4 mobile units 586 638Benson MS 625 508West Johnston HS 1600 1428• CTP This pmtion of Massengill Pond Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive TranspottationPlan as needing improvement• Environmentally Sensitive District This parcel is not within the ESA, but a po1tion of afloodplain appears on the parcel• Setbacks for lot 1 and lot 27 are 70 feet 011 Massengill Pond Rd Collector StreetStaff Recommendation Prei111i1101y approval subject to the following conditions and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Ce1tifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce1tificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d312 Provide dimensions for cul-de-sacs13 Provide water supply and hydrant placement information to Fire Marshal14 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]15 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structmes, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to Nmth CarolinaHighways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required19 There are concerns about the angle of West Rd and its proximity to entrance of proposedsubdivision It will need to be determined if traffic can be seen on West Rd whenentering and exiting West Rd[Public Utilities]20 Stormwater Statement Required21 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required22 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present23 Potential Buffer located on propetty not shown on plan- Buffer call will need to becompleted if not done so already or the buffer will need to be shown on the plan Providebuffer call with plan submittal24 A reasonable impervious limit per lot should be provided DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here• Scale 1 6534 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISApril 2, 2019 - - - -, ,- -- ·--- I-· - ----------5~-- --~~---· - --- ip 18- --· -·- · - III, ~I Ii,i, i I11 ; i ~5 8 ~f9 t J h~~,6,;~, , ,ill ll ~Iell ~i~ ,,-~lli,i, i ---· ,,,,,;~ I I,, II I • ,,ii•11i•·•lj ii1• I, II1llliUliiiHl1l 1iih11U bi,imi,ictttlif1illillliiii, ,,_· __ _, _, __ Coventry GlenOwner Anne Stamps TaylorDeveloper Skyline DevelopmentSurveyor Alsey J Gilbert, PLSTax ID# 11N02044Locational Data Friendship Church Rd SR 2102 between NC Highway 231 and Simon Rd inONeals Township The proposed subdivision is served by the Corinth-Holders Fire District and theClayton Rescue SquadSite Data 31 41 acres, 37 lots, maximum allowable density 47, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided473 acres, open space required 471 acres, traffic count 260 vpd, prope1ty owners notified 11Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 044 Therefore, CoventtyGlen Subdivision will generate approximately 7 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl le tO II OWllH IS b ase d on t I1 e O ut-o f -C apactt y T a bl e prov, d e db, y ORE DDistrict Capaciv E11rolme11Corinth Holders ES I Mobile Classroom 550 612Archer Lodge MS IO Mobile Classrooms 886 1164Corinth Holders HS 13 Mobile Classrooms 1200 1938• CTP This po1tio11 of Friendship Church Rd does not appear on the ComprehensiveTranspo1tation Plan as needing improvement• Reverse Fronage Lois A Reverse frontage buffer will be required for all lots along FriendshipChurch RdStaff Recommendation Prei111i11a1y approval subject to the following conditions and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Stubout Street extension signage in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 3I 0 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce1tificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 811 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Friendship Church Rd12 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording13 Show to whom open space is dedicated14 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 315 Provide dimensions for cul-de-sacs16 Provide water supply and hydrant placement information to Fire Marshal17 Provide emergency vehicle turn around between lots 5 and 618 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]19 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]20 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction21 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstrnction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North CarolinaHighways22 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be requiredPublic Utilities]23 Stormwater Statement Required24 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required25 Wetland should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present26 A reasonable impervious limit per lot should be provided DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here~ Scale 1 6534 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 812 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISApril 2, 2019,-11 I Hannah Creek TractOwner Jessica WestDevelopet Andlew PhillipsSntveyol Jamie Guetteto, PE-Motlis Ritchie Associates of NCTax ID# 01Gll098ALocational Data 1643 Hannah Creek Rd SR 1171 I4th ofa mile south of Allens Crossroads Rdin Banner Township The proposed subdivision is served by the Banner Fire District and the BensonRescue SquadSite Data 1824 acres, 24 lots, maximum allowable density 27, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required 9,600, traffic count not available, property owners notified 11Additional lufolmationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 060 Therefore, Hannah CreekTract Subdivision will generate approxi111ately 15 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl1 e to II owmg 1 s b ase d on t I1 e O ut-o f -C apac1 tv T a bl e prov1