June 18, 2019 - Planning Board Full Packet

Johnston County Planning BoardJune 18, 2019-600 PMCommissioners Meeting Room-County CourthouseSmithfield, North CarolinaI PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTESFrom the May 21, 2019 Planning Board Meeting600pm Subdivision Review3 SUBDIVISIONS Speakers to be Sworn In• Cambridge Angier 18 73 acres, 21 lots Zacks Mill Rd SR 1319 in ElevationTownship• Kenbridge 2163 acres, 25 lots Massey Holt Rd SR 2372 in Boon HillTownship• Little River Plantation Phase III 436 acres, 50 lots NC 96 just north ofAntioch Church Rd SRI 733 in ONeals Township• Oak Hill Farm 40368 acres, 58 lots Sonny Rd SR 15 IO m ClevelandTownship• Polenta Tract 3362 acres, 25 lots in on Polenta Rd SR 1330 near Grill Rd inCleveland Township600pm or after Public Healings4 REZONING AND SPECIAL USE CASESCASE 460-MODRezoning Petition Petition to modify a special use of 101 acres locatedat 11268 NC Highway 210 in the Elevation Township that currently iszoned Industrial 2-Special Use District 1-2 SUDTax ID 07F06032EOwner Lloyd Lisa GloverApplicant Lloyd Lisa GloverSpecial Use Petition to modify special use to clarify operating hours, increasemaximum allowed vehicles on premises, and change storage requirementsCASE 565-MODRezoning Petition Petition to correctmodify existing special use of62374 acres located at 3900 NC 210 Hwy And 526-684 County HomeRd in Smithfield Township from Industrial 2-Special Use District 1-2SUD, CLO to 1-2 Special Use District 1-2 SUDTax ID l 509033, l 508028C, l 508026C, l 508028 partialOwner Johnston CountyApplicant Johnston CountySpecial Use Request All County facilities Request to modifycorrect the SUPrelated to setbacksCASE 19-11Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 2668 acres located at 7305Cleveland Rd in the Cleveland Township from Agricultural ResidentialAR to Agricultural Residential- Special Use District AR-SUDTax ID 06F04 l 97Owner Michael RiccobeneApplicant Adams Hodge Engineering, PCSpecial Use Major Subdivision with sewer servicesCASE 19-13Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 13 acres of a 54 acre tract located at 2072Old Rock Quarry Rd in Boon Hill Township from Agricultural Residential ARto Industrial 2 - Special Use District 12-SUD Thirty five 35 acres of this tracthas already been rezoned to 1-2 SUD Case 15-01Tax ID 04P10007BOwner James and Sherry WorleyApplicant ESA Princeton 2, LLCSpecial Use Permit To allow for a Solar Utility Facility5 DISCUSSION ITEMS6 INFORMATION ITEMSA Building Pennit TrendsB SubdivisionFee in Lieu StatsC Zoning Case SummaryD Monthly Activity ReportE Johnston County School Data7 NEXT MEETING July 16, 2019-Gpm8 ADJOURNMENTDRAFTMEETING OF THE JOHNSTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARDTuesday, May 21st, 2019 600 pmThe Johnston County Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, May 21st, 2019at 600 pm in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Johnston County CourthouseAnnex, Smithfield, NC with the following membersPresent Allan DeLaine, Larry Massengill, Will Letchworth, Rick Sapir, Scott Smith,Nicole Hackler, Adam Caldwell, Marcia Stewart, Tony Braswell BOCC RepresentativeAbsent Russell Creech, BOE RepresentativeAlso present Braston Newton, Director; Todd Marr, Planner; Jamie Beitel, Planner;Jennifer Slusser, County AttorneyChairman DeLaine opened the meeting at 600 pm with the Pledge of AllegianceMr Smith made a motion to approve the April 16th, 2019 Planning Board Minutes,seconded by Mr Caldwell and carried by a unanimous vote of 8-0Mr DeLaine explained that the Jones-Macrae Tract Subdivision and Rezoning Case 19-11 had been withdrawn from tonights meeting and would not be heardSpeakers were sworn inSubdivisionsIngle Prope1·ty Group SubdivisionOwner Ingle Property GroupDeveloper Ingle Property GroupSurveyor Lambert SurveyingAcreageLots 1001 acres, 3 lotsTax ID# 01011017ALocation Sandy RdSR1169 I4th ofa mile south of its intersection with Kenan Rd inBanner TownshipMr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above He added aportion of the parcel is in the floodplain DOT is requesting that the apron through theROW be paved, if approvedMr WR Lambert, Lincoln St, Benson, representing the property, stated that he wantedto start with a question He did not understand the DOT requirement that was just read1Mr Marr explained where the apron was and what would need to be paved should thissubdivision get approvedMr Lambett stated that Ms Ingle inherited this property from her mother and wanted toget some practical use out of it This will be all the lots she intends to do as there arewetlands further downMs Mary Catherine Ingle, Guy Rd, Clayton, stated that she inherited this land from hermother and her mothers request was for her special needs child as she wanted her todevelop it in such a way that it would provide for his education He is enrolled in aprivate school Two properties are in place already, she added, and rented and they takecare of their properties and make sure they look nice and are an improvement to the landThere was no further discussionStaff recommendation is for preliminary approvalUpon a motion by Mr Caldwell to approve Ingle Property Group Subdivision, secondedby Mr Massengill, the Planning Board approved Ingle Property Group Subdivision witha unanimous vote of 8-0, at the May 21st, 2019 Planning Board MeetingConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee8 Provide Fire Department access road designed to support 75,000 lbs9 Provide hydrant information10 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for streetmaintenance DM Sec 7, L item 811 Show shared driveway access easement and provide statement for sharedmaintenance on Final Plat12 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording13 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 314 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization ofcluster box mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements2[Environmental Health]15 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for eachunapproved lot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOTStandard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision RoadsMinimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Accessto North Carolina Highways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submittedif any road improvements will be required19 Paved the apron from Sandy Rd through ROW[Public Utilities]20 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required21 Stormwater Compliance22 Approval of water systemMaggie Way SubdivisionOwner Marilyn Faye Martin Smith Carole Branch Martin LloydDeveloper James LipscombSurveyor Adams Hodge Engineering, PCAcreageLots 6901 acres, 77 lotsTax ID# 16J0I0l 1Location 1023 Maggie Way SR 1717 off Buffalo Rd in Wilders TownshipMr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the information listed above He addedthat reverse frontage buffers would be required for lots on Maggie WayMr Bob Spence, Attorney, stated this was 77 lots and much reduced from the previousapplication There are expert engineers who were brought in tonight to answer questions,he continued, and there have been 132,000 spent on plans for this site He added that theselots meet all the requirements of the County He explained that schools cannot beconsidered as it relates to subdivisions unless the current County ordinance is changed Hewent over a few cases that are in the Court of Appeals currently He explained thedeveloper will speak as well as engineers and a surveyor is present to answer any questionsthe board may haveMr James Lipscomb, Developer, 328 E Main St, Clayton, stated this is the third timebefore this board for this subdivision The first time it was 318 lots and this time it is only377 They are doing this in phases, with this being the first He recognized the engineers thatwere present and went through a powerpoint presentation showing the maps, access points,soils, etc He explained the stub streets that have been put in as well as the Duke Energypowerline easements He added they can do minor adjustments to make the lots work withthis powerline easementMs Stewart asked which lot #s are affectedMr Newton replied 283,282 and 281 near the backMr Letchworth asked if anything has changed for this piece of land since the past fewmonthsMr Lipscomb said there have been no changes to that portion, they just chopped it offHe added they are developers and will be coming back to phase out the other areaseventuallyMr Smith asked about how they will do the other phasesMr Lipscomb replied he would have preferred to get it all approved at one time but he isthinking 6-9 months getting the first portion of the subdivision on the ground The first 77lots will be about 2 years before being fully completedMr Smith asked about the wetlands and dealing with the Core as far as crossing itMr Lipscomb replied that would not be an issue and they are planning to buffer theimpacts to those wetlands He added that Mr Adams could explain it more There is notanything that is not permittable it is just expensiveMr Spence provided the board a copy of an excerpt from a book written by Dave Owenswith the UNC School of Government stating the laws in the state regarding subdivisionsMr Donnie Adams, Engineer, explained the design and they meet all the Countyrequirements and standards as well as the DOT standards They are confident they canmove forward with permitting The adequate size for fire department turn-arounds havebeen provided and open space has been provided, he statedMr DeLaine asked about the water on the land and how the wetlands will be impactedHe wants to make sure people that buy these lots will not be trapped back there behindthe waterMr Adams explained the streams and how they will access that area in the future Thecrossings will be by Core requirements, he stated He doesnt see a public health or safetyissue in any wayMr Smith asked about the first creek and a blue line streamMr Adams replied it was not required to be subject to the rules They designed around it4Mr, Spence asked if based on his expert opinion, have all the requirements been met anddesigned accordinglyMr Adams replied, yesMr Josh Ranki, Traffic Engineer with Ramey Kemp and Associates, explained the TIAand trip generation they had completed The major difference in this vs how the entireparcel was evaluated is with these 77 lots in the am there was approximately one tripevery minute 59 peak hour trips and the pm is slightly higher at 79 peak trips He addedthey have worked extensively with DOT to make sure all the requirementsimprovementswill be metMr Letchworth asked if they were aware at this point what requirements would berequired by DOTMr Ranki replied not at this pointMr Lipscomb added they will require improvements at Stotts Mill Rd at Buffalo, he ispretty sure They are willing to do whatever DOT will requireMr Ranki stated that Turnipseed and Maggie Way will be altered in the future, more thanlikelyMr Letchworth asked about the resurfacing of Maggie Way since it is in such bad shapeMr Ranki replied, due to the volume on Maggie Way it is probably not high on the listMr Smith asked when they could expect a final determination from DOT on what isneededMr Ranki replied they would have to do a phasing studyMr Lipscomb inte1jected that this is why it would have been easier if all of this wasapproved upfront at one time so the TIA could have answered a lot of these questionsWith the smaller phases, it will take longer, he stated There may be a bond put up,maybe 40 and 80 lots completeMr Ranki stated that DOT does know there is a bigger picture here with the entireportion developed at final stageMr Spence asked ifin his legal engineer expertise if this meets all requirements of trafficand sufficient accessMr Ranki replied yes5Mr Mike Stokes, Surveyor, Rock Quarry Rd, Raleigh, stated that he did the originalboundary survey There is a map of correction in the Planning Office showing thepowerline easement and that will be recorded probably this week, he addedMr Spence asked in his professional opinion does this meet all the requirements from asurveyor standpointMr Stokes replied yesMr Lipscomb wanted to be sure the board knew that the powerline easement was notmissed on purpose, it was not caught in all the deed references they completed, he addedMr Stokes stated there were four lots in questions and they could still meet setbackrequirements with the easementMr Spence explained the Pineville case and reiterated that schools cannot be an issue asfar as the boards decisionMr DeLaine stated that they have been provided lots of reading information at themeeting by Mr Spence and he believes the board needs time to review itMr Spence replied they have provided expert testimonyMs Stewart referenced the case he read to them and explained the modesty of the trafficimpact She is not sure how that references this caseMr Spence replied that traffic experts have spoken and brought evidence stating thatMaggie Way is competent and they are working to meet all the requirements He addedthere has to be expertiseMr Caldwell asked even if a property owner sees the property flood then that does notmatter because they are not expertsMr Spence stated that was correct On traffic, that is an expert issueMr Ranki stated the trip generation for this road is below the threshold and will haveminor impactsMs Stewart asked about the construction impactMr Ranki replied they would have to look at deterioration He does not feel like he canrespond as an expert on thatMr Letchworth stated that this is a small two-lane narrow road and there are multipletypes of traffic impacts The substandard road is an issue for him as well as the conditionand width of Maggie Way6Mr Newton has had conversations with DOT about the substandard road as far asneeding resurfacing and they are aware and will look into it, he addedMr Letchworth explained how hes aware that it does make a difference in having 77lots vs 300Mr Ranki stated DOT may not look at this now but in the future when this subdivision isbuilt out then improvements could be made at that time when buses start going downthere Priorities may change for DOT once more traffic is out thereMr DeLaine asked if he believes they are creating a safety issueMr Ranki replied no, not creating a safety issue but it is hard to say with no accidentreport to dateMr Spence asked ifthere is somewhere in the County ordinance that states they mustlook at the composition of the roadMr DeLaine replied it states they have to look at safetyMr Spence and Ms Slusser discussed the portion of the ordinance that refers tocirculation and accessMr Spence stated that is all a DOT issueMr Ranki explained that if there were a school being built down this road and buseswould be coming and going and passing one another then yes, it would have to beimmediately upgraded but for 77 lots he does not see that being an issue Once thesubdivision grows to completion then he is sure DOT will require different things Hebelieves that staff will work close with DOT and make sure needs are metMr Herbert Case, 16750 Buffalo Rd, Wendell, stated that he can see this parcel out ofhis back pasture He is an associate with an engineers office so he considers himself anexpett and he has vested interest in this The road comes out at the corner of hisdaughters house His concerns are the number of lots, just as it was before Heunderstands 77 lots is better but that is still a lot of homes back there He also hasconcerns with the average lot sizes He continued that sanitation and septic as well as theright-of-way in the middle of the cemetery and the church are other issues The area isgrowing fast and that is not a safe curve at the Stotts Mill end He understands there isno legal matter for schools but the developments are going faster than the infrastructurecan keep up with, he continuedMr Spence inte1jected that he is not adjacent to this site and he does not agree with thisbeing on recordMr DeLaine stated that it was his discretion as Chairman as to what is heard at themeeting and he is allowing this person to speak and asked that Mr Case speak directly tohim and the board7Mr Case continued, stating that Johnston County cannot support continueddevelopments He is not opposed to growth but there needs to be a safe environment forfamilies and this subdivision will directly affect his family and farmMr Braswell noted that there is no tax increase for Johnston County this yearStaff recommendation is for preliminary approvalMr Smith asked about staffs conversation with DOT about potential future roadimprovements He asked if this was verbal onlyMr Newton replied yesMr Massengill stated that he thinks these 77 lots are a pilot experiment as to what effectthey will have on the roads, school capacities, etc This phase is really just a study as towhether this will all workMr Slusser pointed out there is no master plan with phases presented There is one 77 lotsubdivision phase at this point That is what is before the board to be heard at this timeMr Smith discussed the timeframe for improvements and stated that in his opinion untilthey know what DOT is going to require for these 77 lots let alone the others, he doesntfeel comfortable making a recommendation at this timeMr Newton went over Conditions 16, 17 and 18, which state design, and approval is partof the driveway process That normally happens after preliminary approval takes placeThat is when they evaluate a planThere was brief discussion by the board on site improvements and the intentMr Letchworth stated again that he has issues with this substandard road and will havefurther issues as these phases develop but he said that 77 lots is better than the original300+Mr Caldwell agrees with Mr Smith and Mr Letchworth s concerns but he does notrecall such scrutiny at this level for a similar size subdivision in the pastUpon a motion by Mr Letchworth made a motion to approve Maggie WaySubdivision, seconded by Ms Hackler, with Mr Smith being in opposition, the PlanningBoard approved Maggie Way Subdivision with a vote of7-I at the May 21st, 2019Planning Board Meeting8Conditions and Rcqufremcnts[Planning]I234567891011121314abCComplete flood plain informationMetes boundsCertificationsEntrance sign street signsStreet name approvalAll lots shall access internal streetsCul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontageComplete improvements or provide performance guaranteeProvide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for streetmaintenance DM Sec 7, L item 8Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recordingShow to whom open space is dedicatedProvide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec14-75 d 3Stubout Street extension signage in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d3Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization ofcluster box mail receptacle unitsCBU shall not impede the flow of trafficCBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesCBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]15 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for eachunapproved lot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOTStandard Specifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision RoadsMinimum Construction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Accessto North Carolina Highways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submittedif any road improvements will be required[Public Utilities]19 Developer will be required to extend water main to and into the proposedsubdivision meeting fire flow requirements20 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits required921 Stormwater Statement Required22 A reasonable impervious limit per lot should be provided23 Potential buffers located on property not shown on plan- Buffer call will needto be completed if not done so already Provide buffer call with plansubmittalThere was a short breakRezoningsCase 460 Modification- Rezoning PetitionOwner Lloyd Lisa GloverApplicant Lloyd Lisa GloverAcreage 101 acresTax ID # 07F06032ELocation 11268 NC Hwy 210 in Elevation TownshipSpecial Use Petition to modify special use to clarify operating hours, increase maximumallowed vehicles on premises and change storage requirementsMr Newton introduced the case and referenced the information listed above He added thiscase came in as a violation in January of this year and the current use is for auto repair,towing and storage onlyMs Hackler asked if the special use permit expired due to the violationMr Newton stated in the history of the County, staff have never allowed these to expire butyet to come into complianceMr Letchwotih asked which conditions are modified and which are newMr Newton explained the original approval conditions and what is being asked to bemodifiedMr Brian Leonard, BRL Engineering, 112 E Johnston St, Smithfield, representing theapplicant, stated that this was purchased as rental propetiy in 2010 and did not know thespecific conditions until it was brought to their attention by the County When this wasbrought to his attention he discussed with staff and they all agreed that the conditions arenot clear The main question was the 20 vehicles, not knowing if that was intended to meanoutside or inside He added that the picture shows the cars in really no sort of order and ifhe had to guess, he thinks that was where the complaint came in They have provided a siteplan to show the board how they can improve things and clarify how and where thevehicles are stored This site is a challenge since it is an existing site The vehicles that are10stored will be out of view and the customer parking will be closer to the front and sides ofthe siteMs Stewmi stated confusion concerning the indoor storage vs outdoor storage She askedif there would be gravel or asphalt where cars are storedMr Leonard replied existing gravel is what will remain and explained where the vehicleswill be located at each stageMr Caldwell asked about the aerial photo and said he counted 54 He asked if they aretrying to reduce that numberMr Leonard replied yes, they are definitely trying to reduce that numberMr Letchwotih asked about the house that shows up on the google street view and asked ifthat was included in the rezoningMr Leonard stated that the intent is anyone that inhabits that house will have parking rightsto park in the front The house is included in the rezoning Parking for staff will be morealong the sidesMr Smith asked how many staff they haveMr Leonard replied space for 13 He understands it looks cluttered and he is aware that afire luck cannot reach all areas of this site There are concerns with that but he feels likethey have provided an avenue for them to at least get in to the siteMr Letchwotih asked if they would site specific parking for the residence on the planMr Leonard stated that was no problemMr Delaine thanked Mr Leonard for his presentation and said it was refreshingMr Thomas Honeycutt, 75 Home Run Alley, adjacent prope1iy owner to the east and northand all of the surrounding property owners are present at the meeting He added the ownersand operators are good people and he is not present to attack the garage He stated thatthere are lots of junk cars and bodies in the back of the garage and showed the boardpictures of the site as of this morning He has actually had some work done at the garagebefore His concern is the number of vehicles on site, 80-100 at times He is opposed toincreasing beyond the original 20 that was first approved There are three buildings on thesite as well He explained an underground tank leak back in the 70s on this site As of2018 it was finally cleaned up He has lived there all his life and many times he has beenmowing grass near it and there have been screeching of tires, accidents and near accidentsdue to people trying to get in and out The fence surrounding the prope1iy is falling downand needs to be improved, he continued11Mr Leonard clarified that they are trying to improve this site and make it legal The storagearea in the back will be only for 26 vehicles to be stored 180 days The ones around thefront and sides of the buildings will only be for daily useMr Letchworth asked if they were requesting this to be a repair shop or a junk yardMs Hackler stated she was wondering the same thingMr Leonard replied repair shop but comes with that is a necessity to store vehiclesMr Smith stated that he would like to hear from the tenant and he feels that 180 days is along time and feels that is more like a junk yardMr Newton explained the junkyard wording in the ordinance vs a repair shop as it relatesto storageMr Letchw01th stated he has no issue with a repair shop but there should be conditionsassociated with itMr Leonard stated that the goal is to try and keep this tenant in business without going toextremeMr Smith stated there needed to be a happy medium somewhereThere was brief discussion of the board on designated parking spots vs number of cars onsite total at any given pointMr Leonard stated they have something to show how things will be from here on out withthe updated site plan He knows that history is hard to overcomeMr Lloyd Glover, Owner, 126 Circle G Lane, Willow Springs, stated that he has knownthe tenant for many years and they own PJs Auto The previous owner was in financialdistress and the site has always looked as it is As long as he is getting rent then he hasallowed it to stay as it is They have done a lot of cleaning in the past 60 days or so andthey have to have order to do business He also tows for the Highway Patrol and that is howthe numbers calculate so fast For highway rotation, when they haul in a wrecked vehicle,you have to wait to find owners, wait on insurance, lots of reasons they have to sit there along time He does not want PJs to not be able to continue to operate but they understandit needs to be cleanedMr Caldwell suggested they need to speak with the tenantStaff recommendation is for denial due to inconsistency with the Comprehensive LandUse Plan and continued violation of current Special Use Also, Emergency Managementhas issue with Fire Trucks not being able to gain access to prope1tyUpon a motion by Ms Stewart to table the Modification of Case 460 until the Junemeeting, seconded by Mr Smith, Modification of Case 460 was tabled by a unanimousvote of8-0 at the May 21st, 2019 Planning Board Meeting12Case 19-12 - Rezoning Petition - Special Use PermitOwner NC Golf Cars Plus, LLCApplicant Bartlett Engineering Surveying, PCAcreage 7 35 acresTax ID # 11003003CLocation 757 Creech Rd in the ONeals TownshipSpecial Use Outdoor RV, vehicle, boat storage mini-storage unitsMr Newton introduced the case and referenced the information listed above He added thisdid not come in as a violationMr Steve Oliverio, Bmtlett Engineering, representing the owner, stated they are happy toanswer any questions from the boardMr Letchwmth stated this is one of the nicest facilities he has seen that has been approvedVe1y well keptThere was no discussionStaff recommendation is for approvalUpon a motion by Ms Stewart to approve Rezoning Case 19-12, seconded by MrSapir, Rezoning Case 19-12 were approved by a unanimous vote of8-0 at the May 21st,2019 Planning Board MeetingMr Newton read the Special Use ConditionsUpon a motion by Mr Letchworth to approve the Special Use Conditions for Case 19-12,seconded by Ms Stewart, carried by a unanimous vote of 8-0, the Special Use Conditionsfor Case 19-12 were approved at the May 2151, 2019 Planning Board MeetingFindings of Facts and Special Use ConditionsI That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operatedso as to maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;Applicant The proposed development will be an accepted use for theproposed GB-SUD zoning and will be placed upon the site and designed tofollow all current Johnston County Design Standards and Specifications2 That the use of development appears to comply with all required use andintensity regulations of Articles II IV of the Johnston County LandDevelopment Code and the applicable specific standards in section 14-257 andwith all applicable regulations;Applicant This property will be developed in accordance with the requireduse and intensity regulations of the Johnston County Land Use Code as13well as all state and federal regulations3 That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated soas to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, or that the use ordevelopment is a public necessity;Applicant The proposed use of this property will be an extension of thecurrent use adjacent, and to the north, within this same tax parcel4 That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physicaldevelopment of the Countys Planning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or otherdevelopment policies as adopted by the Board of CommissionersApplicant This allowed use within the requested GB-SUD zoning shall bein accordance with the Countys Planning Policies by extending an alreadyin place and operating use within the same tax parcel, providing a lowimpactuse that blends with the rural settingSpecific Land Uses APPLICANT Automotive Part Sales AutomotiveRepair-MechanicalSpecial Use ConditionsI Permitted Uses Outdoor RV, vehicle, boat storage, mini-storage units2 The Special Use Permit shall expire with the violation of any Special UseCondition3 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by thePlanning and Zoning Department Staff4 Existing natural vegetation is acceptable in lieu of the Class B buffer 2 largetrees, 3 small trees, and 9 shrubs every one hundred 100 linear feet A Class Blandscape buffer shall be installed along all rezoning lines where existingvegetation is not equal to or more intense than a Class B buffer5 Storage yard shall be fenced, required buffering shall be on the outside of thefencing6 All signage shall comply with the sign code limited to one 60sf ground ormonument sign only7 All buildings andor structures if any must comply with rules enforced by thefollowing departments andor agencies Johnston County Building Inspections,Public Utilities, Environmental Health, NC Department of Transportation8 Lighting if any shall be dark sky and engineered so as not to shine onto adjacentproperties9 Mini-Storage Hours of operation 24 hours a day 7 days a week with key codeaccess to security gate14There was no discussion items for the eveningMeeting ended at 845 pmRespectfully submitted byStephanie Richter, Secretary to the Board15Cambridge Angier SubdivisionOwner Angier Estates, LLCDeveloper Angier Estates, LLCSurveyor IJass, Nixon, Kennedy, IncTax ID# 07E06031A; 13E06031Locational Data Zacks Mill Rd SR 13 I 9 I4th of a mile east of its intersection with Penny Rd inElevation Township The proposed subdivision is served by the 502 IO Fire District and RescueSquadSite Data 18 73 acres, 21 lots, maximum allowable density 28, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required 8,400, traffic count 490 vpd, property owners notified 8Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 042 Therefore, CambridgeAngier Subdivision will generate approximately 9 K-12 students split amongst thethree schools below0 Tl IC ~O II owmg IS b ase d on t I1 e O ut-o f -C apac1t y T a bl e provt d e d bJV OREODistrict Cmu1citv E11rol111e11tFour Oaks ES 4 mobile classrooms 1050 1106Four Oaks MS 4 mobile classrooms 500 561West Johnston HS 1600 1433• CTP This portion of Zacks Mill Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportation Planas needing improvementStaff Recommendation Preli111i11a1J approval subject to thefollowi11g co11ditio11s a11d requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Stubout Street extension signage in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 310 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance OM Sec7, L item 811 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 313 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]15 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to No1th CarolinaHighways17 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required[Public Utilities]18 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required19 Stormwater Compliance20 Approval of water system~~ DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 6534 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 812 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISJune 4, 2019I ri,SHEET2,CAMBRIDGE ANGIER ~ ~SUBDIVISION A»DSITE DEVELOPMaIT PLAN f1,1 , 11, ~- ij 7~1J r;,1 I w 11 ~-·JI r,I1I ~rn Llli l~,,-, 1 ~-;,~,1~•1att,t 11 ,, ~i~iIj 1 II IiII ll IiI ; I II l IiiIIBASS, NIXON KENNEDY, INCCONSULTING ENGINEERS mmra 6l110WElHfUM,lll,MTE,AAWGH,NC1•17TElEFHC,,E ,M-«12 FAY 1111~1-SSCEHTlflC1,~ NlBe,;,, ~C61l5 ¼110C, ucecu KenbridgeOwner J N Developers, LLCDeveloper J N Developers, LLCSurveyor Bryan K Jones Consulting Engineers, PATax ID# 04P12018D; 04P12018JLocational Data Massey-Holt Rd just south of Long Leaf Rd in Boon Hill Township Theproposed subdivision is served by the Oakland Fire District and the Princeton Rescue SquadSite Data 2163 acres, 25 lots, maximum allowable density 32, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided133 acres, open space required 324 acres, traffic count not available, property owners notified 13Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 081 Therefore, KenbridgeSubdivision will generate approximately 20 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools belowo The following is based on the Out-of-Capacity Table provided by OREODistrict Cr1vacit1• E11rol111e11tPrinceton ES 886 760Princeton MS I I 00 1012Princeton HS 1100 1012• CTP This portton of Massey-Holt Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportat1011 Planas needing improvement• E11viro11111e11tally Sensitive District This parcel is not within the ESA, however a floodplainappears on the parcelStaff Recommendation Prei111i11a,1, approval subject to the following co11ditio11s and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce,tificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Show to whom open space is dedicated12 Provide 20 fee simple access to open space13 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 314 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]15 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the currentNCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to Nmih CarolinaHighways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required[Public Utilities]19 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required20 Stormwater Compliance21 Approval of water system- ~~ DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 6534 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISJune 4, 20191 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR l1~ ,_,,, ,e ; ·~-- - - - - - - -,,,- --- -•~2- - ~~ -- - - - - - - ;t--~----_j~ ,~ ~10,,,~i~,,,,,,~~ KENBRIDGE~, siA~~M_ON OPEN AREA ,f ~ I I ~~I, -993ACRE•46 , ~ -JillPl [I • ,;,--i -wgl# ~CT-0, I i]efI I~-- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - --t;;;,n- - - ~ ~tWEST END_QE_PROPERTY -• ~----~SITE t ,0VICINITY MA--PWOS, ltNCTH D1Ft CSTATCO~Ul OOOI ~~J- OflINDPTro111, ZON,,0 ARBOON HILL TOWNSHIPJOHNSTON COUNTY, N C~,,, ,,,, i • ~ ·-· - ·•- ~ ,, , • ,- ,- ,---,- --,---,o --• ,--7 ,---~,c--7 ,-----7 ,-----7 ,-- --7 ,--- --7 ,--~-7 ,-----,,,--- ~;1f-t--------71r - --J-,1r---;i , , I I I I • I -- -- ,, -- I1 1 11 •----- - _,- ,,,_ iil I , 1I 1-J-- I I , I I I - - - - - ,, - - -- - -- --- - - --,_ -- - - - ,,, ,,,, ,, -- - ----- ,, , , •,-,, • , f ,,;,, · ---- ,, ,,,_ I , , ,, 1,- -----~,•Ii -, r-, ,, jc ,i •i L-1-- --Ji,, ---1 lf ,_, -~---~-J•-•- ~ ~ f • 1~ , • ~ -- ,, _,,,,,,,,_, -·-· ,,, ,;•- ,,, --· •• ,, ~ ,,, ·-· ,, ,_,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,,~, ,_, -•--•, h ,,;,, , ;, ,_ -t , __ , ---,,_ ----- ,, ~ ,, --- ,,, ,,, J , , --- 1 -- ----- ,---- -- , -- ·· i- - i- Jc -------- ,------- ----c ,-------- h,-----V-,--A- ,---- --- - - - --~---- J ~, --~ , - •• - - - • - - - --- , • --- -- -- ,w • , • -~- r;, , - - ~li1 nlI--~-- -•, ·-- -- - --- ·- , --- - __-, - , - ----,-- ____-_,_-__ ,_ ------ __- _, - ,_ ,- - --- , , ,, , _,, ~·- - ·,, ·,- ------ ,_--,- --------·-c-c---------------•- -------- --------, --- -,-_- ----, -- -, --cs ----- if,,-•- i ~• • , ,, --- ,_- I -~- -,• -- ,,_ -- • - • - -, ~ 29,7,CJSF 1, ~ I 10,, ~·1~,16,6QOSFt1~ 16,600-sFc 1i_ 1a600-s1 h1~ 16,600SF-1·1~ 16,600SF ~1 1aJOOfF1,1 -9,J ~1~ 16wssFi~23,4~6SF , ,-J a• tl d,, • I 22,107SF ,_ - - ,_ -1 ,---- ,, -- -I 16,15QOSF 0 ; • • • •• h , - - ; I , 0 ~ , ,~, L- ---•, CI , c z , • , , , ,,, --- ,,,,, _ , -----, -, ,, ,,,- ,- ,, , ,,, ,• , ,,•, • , , I ·--·-- • • , - -, -- - -- -- -- -- • ,,, - ·- -- - - -~- --- -- -- --- - - ·--- •, ---- -- , L-_,--,--d----- - ---••- CC•----,_, -s,_ _ 0- c - ·•• C--_c,, ---•- - C- - ---•--~ - L- , ~- 0 • 0~ ~,; R ~I HOMUJ14J-lll~IN o-,~r,1m, lMNO, AR ti - or_ee~ooi- i11~7 I#I~TlflA ltJIDIJCTI,MRl° -t1 I~~·-···· I~-fl~~ OWNe1tJ•NO-LOPa~ll·-· ~· °~ OYllE°•°-°,,,,,,oO-oMv·aJoO ,,,l,n ,lf,,,,,,c,,,,1cW,oe~Cclc,folloo°,,,~~°lc·NClWOLlC1MloI I ,,,,,,,,,_°-,•,TCTAJWoeao,PIIOFOOCOOm1l1t0f -oTLOr- 211,DOII °UlT ,_,,,° ,,, ,~,,,, ~~~ ,,,,~° OFt,OFt,cc,,,,omim1 ,OFt°°~•AFEAOO•rEH•1NeOTO OLmllOCTH,oJ11,°lL000lIOJN•O,~Ollll,Jll00,,010~-°mrr,OWJo, c,oonE o•oooe•wm•~·lEWl~l°MOU-ltTO-,°-°mwu,mo,,,· la• Ic, ,,-;;,,,,;,,},-1J _; I ·m,, ~; _,,0, ,~JONES CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PA, ~ o•tOlll«Oroc088l °rJfJ; Ooldoboro, No,t~Ca,-ol,,a 27532_Qcl_-;3;,8•2 uc, c-_~B 19055 I~ 50KENBRIDGE SUBOMSlONPREIJMNARY PLAT·o••J N DEVELOERS, LLC4292019 1 or lLittle River Plantation Phase IIIOwner Catherine BunnDeveloper Last Investments, LLCSurveyor Lee R Hines, Jr, PETax ID# 11M02007Locational Data NC Hwy 96 0 7 miles north of Antioch Church Rd SR 1733 in ONealsTownship The proposed subdivision is served by the ONeals Fire District and the Clayton RescueSquadSite Data 436 acres, 50 lots, maximum allowable density 65, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required 20,000, traffic count 1900 vpd, prope1ty owners notified 29Additional Infonnationo Sctool District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 079 Therefore, Little RiverPlantation Phase Ill Subdivision will generate approximately 40 K-12 students splitamongst the three schools below0 Tl ie fo II owm g 1 s ba se d on t I1 e O ut-o f -C apac1t y T a bl e prov, d e dbJV OREODistrict Capacity E11rolme11tCorinth Holders ES I mobile classroom 550 623Archer Lodge MS JO mobile classrooms 886 1204Corinth Holders HS 13 mobile classrooms 1200 1943• CTP This pmtion of NC Hwy 96 N appears on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as amajor thoroughfare with adequate design capacity• Environmentally Sensitive District This parcel is within the ESA, and a floodplain appears on aportion of the parcel• This phase will most likely require a tum lane 011 NC 96 according to the NCDOTStaff Recommendation Prei111i11a,y approval subject to the following conditions and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Ce1tifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce1tificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 312 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]13 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]14 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction15 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to No1th CarolinaHighways16 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required17 Turn lane on NC 96 will most likely be required[Public Utilities]18 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required19 Stormwater Compliance20 Approval of water system DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here Scale 1 6534 - 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISJune 4, 2019LITTLE RIVER PLANTATIONPHASE THREEJOHNSTON COUNTY, NC~FORREVIBWOSLYOak Hill FarmOwner Ben Johnson John JohnsonDeveloper Ben Johnson John JohnsonSurveyor True Line SurveyingTax ID# 06F04034ELocational Data Sonny Rd SR 1510 west of Matthews Rd toward Raleigh Rd in ClevelandTownship The proposed subdivision is served by the McLemore Fire District and the 50210 RescueSquadSite Data 40368 acres, 58 lots, maximum allowable density 60, water service shall be providedby Johnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open spaceprovided fee-in-lieu, open space required 23,200, traffic count not available, prope1iy ownersnotified 22Additional Informationo Sctool District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 050 Therefore, Oak HillFarm Subdivision will generate approximately 29 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl IC £O II owmg IS ba se d on t he O ut-o f-C apac,ty T a bl e prov, d e dbV OREODistrict Cavacifl• E11rol111e11tPolenta ES 11 mobile classrooms 886 1100Swift Creek MS 800 640Cleveland HS 5 mobile classrooms 1200 1689• CTP This pmiion of Sonny Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive Transpmiation Plan asneeding improvement• Off site tum lanes requirements 011 Raleiglt Rd are anticipated by NCDOT• Lot 26 needs to be serled internallyStaff Recommendation Preliminm1• approval subject to thefollowi11g conditions and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide a 50 stubout between lots 11 and 12 but this will most likely make these lots toosmall according to Environmental Health10 Stubout Street extension signage in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 311 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 812 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording13 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 314 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstrnct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]15 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Strnctures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North CarolinaHighways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required19 Turn lanes on Raleigh Rd are anticipated as a requirement for this subdivision byNCDOT20 Lot 26 needs to be internally served[Public Utilities]21 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required22 Stormwater Compliance23 Approval of water system- ,- J~ J;~ ~1j,J,s,il~• DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 6534 1 in ; 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISJune 4, 2019I I llPolenta Road TractOwner Edwin B Benton Family TrustDeveloper Grny Wolf DevelopmentSurveyor Bateman Civil Survey CompanyTax ID# 06F04199Locational Data Polenta Rd SR 1330 just west of Grill Rd toward Watkins Rd in ClevelandTownship The proposed subdivision is served by the Mclemore Fire District and the 502 IO RescueSquadSite Data 3362 acres, 25 lots, maximum allowable density 50, water se1vice shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space provided1266 acres, open space required 504 acres, traffic count not available, prope1ty owners notified 14Additional Informationo Sctool District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 050 Therefore, Polenta RdTract Subdivision will generate approximately 13 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl 1e ~o II owmg 1 s ba se d on t I1 e O ut-o f -C apac1t y T a bl e prov, de dbJ V OREODistrict Cavaciti• E11rol111e11tPolenta ES 11 mobile classrooms 886 1100Swift Creek MS 800 640Cleveland HS 5 mobile classrooms 1200 1689• CTP This po1tion of Polenta Rd appears on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as athoroughfare with adequate design capacity• E11liro11111e11tally Sensitile District This parcel is not within the ESA, however a floodplainappears on the parcel• Relerse Frontage Lots A reverse buffer is required for all lots along Polenta RdStaff Recommendation Preli111i11my approval subject to thefollowi11g co11ditio11s and requirementsConclitions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce1tificate for street maintenance OM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Polenta Rd11 Show to whom open space is dedicated12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 313 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]15 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to No1th CarolinaHighways17 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required[Public Utilities]18 Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan required19 Stonnwater Compliance20 Approval of water system~~ DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereiScale 1 6534 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISJune 4, 2019yi7_1_17,AP;IT£ QATA TAtl_~r_~c;ro~c~CllMNT OCNlDN~MOl¥~MV,f0lUl1TllASOCNTONTlllmtC~-,,u,-1 , ,o,,,,~r_,o,,,01c-- Wl1lT,,°r•_-,,uuu ~•mo,oo•,~P1C•MU-• ,OOI KW1~JQ,I_S2~~i;_c ,,,•, -1 •~~-U• • ~ U,_ u u-0,,,,,,,_tll~POLE NT A ROAD TRACTPRELIMINARY PLAT~DEVELOPERGRAYIIOlF OCVCLOfMtNT1~ AIRPORT IN0UTRI- OR ;TC 101CLAYTON, NC 7~ZO l ff~~I i;_,~~;,,PO LENT A ROADCLEVELAND TOWNSHIPJOHNSTON COUNTYPROJECT PLANGRAPHIC SCALE1InhmnOVtlER~COMN T lCJ,ITON FAMILYTRu;rROOCRT THOM~ DCNTON TRvrcc,, OCCR 1llANO ROWAIICOORO NC 20so-tBateman Civil Survey CompanyEngineers • Surveyors • Planners2524 Roe-lanc;e Anue, Aplt, Nonh C1ohM 27539Phone 919sn1oeo Faic g1~sn1oe1NCBELZ FIRM No C-~78ENGINEER0-,TtMAA CIVIL CURVCYCOMPANY, PC2~21 RCLJANCC AVCAPCX,NCrJJ~HEET Ll-;T COVCR HCCT,-_PfELIMINlR_Yt,pT RELE~S D FORCG,_NSTRUCTI NOSID1CXl~TINC CONOITION;TC PLAN~ KNOW WHAT IS BELOWCAll BEFORE YOU DIGPROJECT NUMBER 190286 cooo~~~~~~ f~ g~SITE PLANPOLENTAROAD TRACTPRELIMINARY PLATNLEUTA1~~SH C~1ti1O IJITYSTAFF REPORTREZONING AND SPECIAL USE CASE 460-MODRezoning Petition Petition to modify special use of 10 l acres located at 11268 NC Hwy 21 0 inElevation Township currently zoned Industrial 2-Special Use District 12-SUDTax ID 07F06032EOwner Lloyd Lisa GloverApplicant Lloyd Lisa GloverSpecial Use Permit Petition to modify special use to clarify operating hours, increase maximumallowed vehicles on premises, and change storage requirementsUtilities Services• 50-2 l 0 Fire District and Rescue SquadExisting and Sunounding Land UsesZoning• Existing Land Use Zoned 1-2 SUD and used for automotive repair, towing, and storage• Sunounding Land Uses Zoned AR and used for agricultural and residential purposes Zoned GBSUDand used for automotive repairTraffic Concerns• Traffic count this portion of NC Hwy 210 is 7200 vpd• This po1tion ofNC Hwy 210 appears on the CTP as a boulevard needing improvementLand Use Plan• This area is located within a designated Primary Growth Area on the Countys Comprehensive LandUse Plan This denotes an area in which high levels of growth pressures currently exist or are anticipatednear termStaff Comments and Recommendation• Number of notices sent 3• This site came in as a complaint to Zoning Enforcement for zoning violation in January 2019STAFF RECOMMENDATION Denial, due to inconsistency with the Comprehensive Land Use Planand continued violation of current Special Use Also, Emergency Management has issue with FireTrucks not being able to gain access to propertyFinding of Facts for the Special Use Permitl That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated as to maintain or promotethe public health, safety, and general welfare;Applicant The cunent use has been in operation for at least 19 years and has operated in amanner that has presented no immediate threat or harm to public health, safety, or welfareUpon modification of the original Special Use Permit, and bringing the site into compliance withany modified conditions as required, the site itself will continue to be operated as an existing orsimilar use, in the same general manner, with even better designated vehicular areas and moreorderly business operations2 That the use of development appears to comply with all required use and intensity regulations ofArticles II IV of the Johnston County Land Development Code and the applicable specific standardsin section 14-257 and with all applicable regulations;Applicant The applicant has been informed that the current tenant on-site is not in compliancewith some of the ambiguous conditions of the original Special Use Permit It appears there havebeen some misunderstandings of the interpretation of the original Special Use Permit; thereforeapplicant desires to modify aud identify more specific on site areas for designated vehicularparking and storage Applicant feels this greatly clarify the understanding and interpretation ofall requirements for the Special Use Permit3 That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain orenhance the value of contiguous property, or that the use or development is a public necessity;Applicant Upon this requested modification of the original Special Use Permit and conditions,and designation of specific vehicular and storage areas on site, applicant believes that the dailyoperations and visual appearance on the site, whether occupied by tenants or others, will benoticeably improved with more orderly business operations Consequently, this should enhancethe surrounding area and properties4 That the use or development conforms with general plans for the physical development of the CountysPlanning jurisdiction, the Design Manual, or other development policies as adopted by the Board ofCommissionersApplicant Upon modification of the original Special Use conditions and bringing this site intocompliance as required, the use at this location will continue to be as it has for years, but shouldprovide more orderly business operations and visual improvement to the site Therefore, the useshall continue to conform with the Countys requirements AND these modifications will enhanceand clarify the initial intentions of the original Special Use Permit as adopted by the BoardSpecific Land Uses APPLICANT Auto Repair, Towing, StorageSpecial Use ConditionsI Permitted Uses Automotive repair and towing and storage only2 The Special Use Permit shall expire with the violation of any Special Use Condition3 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the Planning and ZoningDepa11ment Staff4 All signage shall comply with the sign code limited to one 60sf ground or monument sign only5 All buildings andor structures must comply with rules enforced by Federal, State and Local agencies6 Lighting shall be dark sky and engineered so as not to shine onto adjacent prope11ies7 Hours of operation shall be 700 AM to 900 PM, seven days a week8 Limited to 53 vehicles on the premises at one time for the purpose of being repaired, to be repaired,storage and towing9 No vehicle shall remain on premises for a period of no more than 180 daysI 0 All vehicles must remain in designated storage areas per site plan drawing and in a neat and orderlyfashion11 Any parts, motors, tires, etc must ne kept in storage areas as indicated on site plan drawing Storageincludes allowance of two metal storage containers 8 x 40 each to keep parts in a neat and orderlyfashion All storage of parts are to remain behind an 8 solid fence12 Records must be maintained on each vehicle on lot13 Landscape buffer Class B required on rear and sides of property14 Access drive and gates are required to be a minimum of20 feet wide for FD access and vehicles cannotobstruct access to the structuresZoning Map 460-MOD1 1-------1 Subject PropertyRezoning Petition Petilion to modify a special useof 101 acres located at 11268 NC Highway 210 inthe Elevation Township that currently iszoned Industrial 2-Special Use District 1-2 SUDTax ID 07F06032EOwner Lloyd Lisa GloverApplicant Lloyd Lisa GloverSpecial Use Petition to modify special use toclarify operating hours, increase maximumallowed vehicles on premises, and changestorage requirementsLegendCity LimitsZoning DistrictsLJARV,~ AR-SUDLJNB~ NB-SUDD esC]cs-suoI1 inch 009 milesTown Planning Limits IETJIGB ~ IHI RR~ GB-SUD ~IHI-SUD W RR-SUDD 1-1 - MHPDDi-1-SUD Do-1? 1-2 D o-1-suo~ 1-2-SUD PUD460-MOD Ortho~ Cid , --· ~-- ~ ·-~ ~ ··--- , •• I IL~ ------ -· ~- J- - ~ • -~ • c , , --~ J02192017 - 03162017460-MODNOTICE OFPUBLIC HEARINGCASE_ Lfb l1DD _for lnor1111tlo11 Ploase Cont,1ct1ho Johnson Couny Pl,,nnlng Zoning OeplflmMt919 989- 5150n,, ,, M,,_ l lih,, fHt•1tlhl1 Id 111r ,rI ,- VUII_~ J • I Yo,,--;;;Rh70NllfG PEJITION SPECIAL usE APPLICATIONPAGE 3 of 1I,r__v,nmt@mv,, tr@tli1fila@N --------_Johnston Count Planning, Zoning309 E 11irket Street, SmithGdd, NC 2;,Phone 91 9 989-5150 Fax 919 989-546wwwjoh11sto11nccom lanningN nm c of 1pplic1ntPcti1ionc1 I, l oyd l Gl over T, ina Michc llc Gl ove rMiili11e Address of Jpplici nt 126 Circl e_ c;; Lane , 0l i l low Spri n q s , NC 2592Telephone 919 4 22 - 339 919 422-3391 Fnx _ 9_1_9_ 6_3_9_-_·,_o_·t_9 _______ _Email llo ycl - lmcl@out look comOw11e1s Nimcs S~ me as lp__p,,_l_1· c_·a_1_1_t _ _ _ _____~fa iling Address of Ownc1 Saine as lppl ic~_n_t ______________________ _Telephone Same as lpplica n _____ _ ___ Email Same au Tlpp licanlSite Address 11G0 NC Highway 210, ncnson, NC 7SOtlfox ]I Number 071•0_6_0_3_ E ______ _State Road ti NC_ _2_1_0 ___ ___ __________________________1ow11ship ElcvaUon Dcccl Hook 4151 Page 8-3Current 7oninp, Distdcts I - 2SUD _ Requested Zoning District __ I_- 2_S_U_D _________ _Acres Dcing Rezoned 101 Ac Total Acres in Pnrcel 1 · 0 l AcList Rcc1ues1ccl Uses • Auto Repai r, Towing, Storape5,1e cdt,,,tto I eJCh ~ bd~ AJ __ Conwk~cJAp11lic; t1 iQll,_70 11ing I ·t; _ Less then 3 Acrcs;__37i00301 -i00 Acres 62500CiOH Acres 1250,00 + 18,75 Acre;_ _ Special Use lcrmit Fee 100 011lr piil if rcci uesting a Special Use Dis trict-1~1_Por Special Use District 5 - EOLDEO lllili JO - 10 1 DEJ 11 x 17 opi~·~ of th 1 prcli111i11a1y p lat,~,__Ccttifiel TIA rccinitcd for developments with 100 peak hout trips or 1000 or more daily trips tpplicnnts TIAmust either be performed by the Co1111 cons11lt111t, or reviewed by the Colnts consult1111 TIA fees tml01review fees must be pnid by the npplicnnt Dc,•clopmcnts requiu11g t TTA rnnnot he plicccl on an agenda u111il n Tf Jis co11dlcted re,·icwed hy the consultnnt1 ce1tif• on this date 3 18 19 that ill lhe i11forrnation presented in this pctilionapplicntion is tccumte to thebest of my knowledge, info1nrntiu11 ind belief Fmther, r 1111dcrst111d lhnt should this pelilio11tpplicition he nppro,·ed bythe Johnston Co1111t llu11d of Cummissio11e1s, nu site nclivity can tn ke place 11111il a si te pl111 nndor nny otl 1cr landclcclopmcnt permits ire issled 1dclilionnll, 1 allow colnt st1ff access to the petition p10pctl while comh1cti11g reviewof his petitionStnflUsc Only JEF------------DAlE_,j - I }J_,_· ---------3B-9_SUDMTlALDJ1E _______ _1rncmvrm BYRlZONING PETIlION SPECIAL USE APPLICATION, -~~ Joh11s1011 C011111 fa nning Zoning~ ,, , ,, J ,, Phone 919 989-5150 Fn 91 9 989-S•6 1 ~,5~Y~~- 309 E ilnrkct St, cct, S111i1hficlcl, NC 757 ,J} lAGE ,f of•~ , ~- wwwohnsto11nccompln11 11i11p, L ~MltJtYJzy~11oP[Pfi1Illi c-~ruo~tJ@1[9t1JJtJ}JlCJLOffJtfJ flwUJ,,c,rn ,1nH•rtfrllft, -tfNo IHOt,1,, 10 ~11, ,c~H ni1 of tlu Jollolling findings of lact must be ndcquntcy addressed co11ccmi11g tlw prop osed ~p ccitil 11sc0£ £Cxo11i11g p etition {,1llt1,h 11fltlitio11t1lrh,,•ft if11,·1ifitlrI Eplnin how 1hc 11scclcvclop111 c111 is locntccl, clcs ignccl, nml ptoposcd 10 he opc1,llcI so ns 10 mnin1,1i11promo1c thepublic hcnllh, sa fct, nncl gcncrnl welfo,c The c urre nt use h«s been in oper«tion [or tL le«ut19 years a nd_ has operated in a ma nner that hns present e el no i rnmecliatc t in-cator hai111 to p ublic heal th, Bafe_t;y_ or 1-1~l _f are U Jon 111ocli ficat ion o f t he ori qi nalSpecial Use Pe rmit, a nd bringinq the s ite into co111pliance 1·1ith a ny 111odi[ied cond i tiollfas required, t he site itself llill con tinue to be operated as a n exi 8ting 0 1 simi l«ruse, i n the ,wme qcneral ma nner, with eve n bet ler clcsignalccl vehicular ai·eas andmor e orderly bu siness opcra tiom1 Epn iJI how lhc clevclopmcnt complies with nil rc1uitcd use nncl intensity rcr,ulntions of the Lnncl Drvclop111cntCocle, other ordinnnces nncl resolutions, md st,, te nncl fcclernl rceubtions The Applicant has been i nformedt hat the current t e n ant o n - site is not i n compliance with some of the ambig uo usconditions o[ t he oriqina l Sped«l Use Permit It appears t here have been somemisundersta ndinqs of the i nterpretation of oriqinal Speci al Use Permit; thcrcoreApplicant desires to modify and identify mo r e specific o n -site areas for designatedve hicular parking and otoraqc lp~licant [eels t h i s greiltly clarify t he understandingand i nterpretation o f o[ all requii·emenls for the Special Use Permit3 Eplnin how 1he uscdcvclopmcnl is located, cles igncd, nncl ptopnscd to be opcrntcI so as to 1nnin1,,i11cnhnncc litev,1luc of contiguous proper l, or 1h1t the usedevelopment is n public ncccssitr Upon t hin requcislccJ moclif ica tiono[ the original Special Use Permit and condi~ions, and clc__i_gnation o[ s~if ic_vehicular and stora~ areas on- site, Applicant bel ieves that t he clail OJ_er~li~nsand vis ual appearance on the s ite , whe ther occupied by tennnts or olhe1·0 , 1·1il l benoticeably imoroved with more orderly busine ~ operations Consequently_, t his s houlde nha nce the s u rroundi ng a 1ea a nd properties•I Epnin how thr uscclevelopmcnt conforms with gcnc1nl plnns for thr phrsicnl ckvclopmcnl of chc Counlrsplanning jurisdiction ns embodied in the Lnncl Development Code, the Countys stt,llegic plnn, or olher developmentpolices idoptcd hr lhc Bonrd of Commiss ioners Upon modification o l the original Special_use conditions a nd b ringing this s ite i nto compli a nce as required, t he use a t t hislocation lli