April 19, 2022 - Planning Board Full Packet

Johnston County Planning BoardApril 19, 2022-600 PMJohnston County CourthouseCounty Commissionels RoomSmithfield, North Carolina1 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE2 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTESFrom the March 15, 2022 Planning Board Meeting600pm Subdivision Review3 SUBDMSIONS Speakers to be Sworn In• Bailey Estates 3955 acres, 3 lots 5478 NC Hwy 2 10 in Smithfield Township• Powhatan Rd Tract 133 17 acres, 8 lots Powhatan Rd SR 190 I just southeast ofPocahontas Trail in Clayton Township• Marvin Smith Tract 2025 acres, 16 lots Surles Rd SR 1104 north of BeasleyEstates Dr in Banner Township• Rawls Tract 3307 acres, 19 lots Old Stage Rd SR 1006 north of Pearidge Rd inPleasant Grove Township• Emerson Field 23 152 acres, 20 lots Rains Crossroads Rd SR 2320 just west ofNahunta Rd in Boon Hill Township• Rains Preserve 2418 acres, 21 lots 6672 Rains Crossroads Road SR 2320 inBoon Hill Township• Johnson Fann 33 56 acres, 35 lots NC Hwy 210 and Berea Church Rd SR 1508in Elevation Township• The Laurel 5922 acres, 46 lots 2641 Powhatan Rd just no11hwest of PocahontasTrail in Clayton Township• The Grove at Gin Branch 5862 acres, 52 lots 305 Turnipseed Rd near the WakeCounty Line in Wilders Township600pm or after Public Hearings4 REZONING AND CONDITIONAL ZONING CASESCASE 22-12Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 3522 acres located at the southeast corner of theintersection of NC Hwy 50 and NC Hwy 42 in the Cleveland Township from AgriculturalResidential AR to General Business GBTax ID 06D0I026R, 06D0I023E, 06D01021COwner Bobby Joe Smith, Barbara S Smith, Megan Elizabeth Sherrill, M GlennMcElveen, Jean J McElveenApplicant White Development CompanyCASE 22-13Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone 304 acres located at 5350 NC Hwy 42 in theONeals Township from Agricultural Residential AR to Community BusinessConditionalZoning GB-CZTax ID I IN04019YOwner Sheets I LLCApplicant Amin SalehConditional Zoning Request Convenience StoreCASE 22-14Rezoning Petition Petition to rezone I acre tract located at 628 Smith Rd in theCleveland Township from Agricultural Residential AR to Agricultural ResidentialSpecialUse District AR-SUDTax ID 06006031 UOwner William Otis Teresa ByrdApplicant USCOC of NC, LLCSpecial Use Request Cell Tower Fenced compound5 DISCUSSION ITEMS6 INFORMATION ITEMSA Building Permit TrendsB SubdivisionFee in Lieu StatsC Zoning Case SummaryD Monthly Activity Repo11E Johnston County School Data7 NEXT MEETING May 17, 2022-6pm8 ADJOURNMENTDRAFTMEETING OF THE JOHNSTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARDTuesday, March 15, 2022 600 pmThe Johnston County Planning Board met in regular session on Tuesday, March 15, 2022at 600 pm in the County Commissioners Meeting Room, Johnston County CourthouseAnnex, Smithfield, NC with the following membersPresent Denise Byrd, Adam Caldwell, Michelle Davis, Nicole Hackler, Brooke Holmes,Debbie Howard, Freddie Hudson, Will Letchworth, Matthew MooreAbsent Braston Newton Director, BOCC Representative, BOE RepresentativeAlso present Todd Marr, Planner; Cameron Pittman, Planner; Jennifer Slusser, CountyAttorney; Brooks Moore, Johnston County Public Schools RepresentativeChairman Letchworth opened the meeting at 600 pm with the Pledge of Allegiance ledby Mr CaldwellApproval of the MinutesUpon a motion by Mr Moore to approve the February 15th Planning Board Minutes,seconded by Ms Holmes and carried by a unanimous vote of 7-0, the February 15, 2022Planning Board Minutes were approved as presentedMs Davis arrived at 603pmAll speakers were sworn inSubdivisionsLangdon Ridge Phase IIIOwner Laura Dupree HoneycuttDeveloper Bradley Built, IncSurveyor Freedom Firm, PCAcreageLots 15 44 acres, 18 lotsTax ID# 13C04049EAddress 2800 Block of County Line RdMr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above informationMr Carlos Bagley, 63 Watkins Rd, Clayton, NC, SurveyorEngineer, was present toanswer any questions the Board may have Mr Bagley stated the particulars of thedevelopmentMs Hackler asked if the adjacent V AD was labeled on the preliminary plan Mr BagleyconfirmedThere was no further discussionChairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staffrecommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff reportStaff recommendation is for approvalUpon a motion by Mr Caldwell to approve Langdon Ridge Phase III, seconded by MsByrd, Langdon Ridge Phase III was approved by a unanimous vote of 8-0 at the March 15,2022 Planning Board MeetingConditions and Requirements[Planning]1 Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenanceOM Sec 7, L item 810 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along County Line Road11 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75d 313 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of clusterbox mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Envirnnmental Health]14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapprovedlot[NCDOT]15 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstrnction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North CarolinaHighways217 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted ifany road improvements will be required[Public Utilities]18 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required19 Stormwater Statement Required20 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present as well asany jurisdictional features and buffers21 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater management[Emergency Se1·vices22 Provide No Parking signs on same side of street as fire hydrants23 Need fire hydrant distribution informationHelen Stephenson TractOwner Helen Stephenson co Danny StephensonDeveloper Jones Creek, LLCSurveyor Freedom Firm, PCAcreageLots 5850 acres, 30 lotsTax ID # 13005028Address 4125 Zacks Mill RdMr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information Mr Marrprovided a revised application from the applicant reflecting a change in ownership Therevised application shows the new property owners as Jones Creek, LLC Mr Marr alsoshared information from a conversation between Mr Newton and NC DEQ concerning acomplaint received about a former hog farm on the propertyMr Caldwell asked staff about an application deadline Mr Marr shared there was adeadline, but minor changes after submittal have been allowed in the pastMr Chip Hewitt, 101 Blackstone Ln, Selma, NC, Attorney representing the Applicant,was present to answer any questions the Board may haveMr Carlos Bagley, 63 Watkins Rd, Clayton, NC, SurveyorEngineer, was present toanswer any questions the Board may have Mr Bagley stated the particulars of thedevelopmentMr Hewitt addressed the former hog farm on the property, specifically a former hog houseMr Bagley confirmed that the area would not be included in the proposed subdivisionMs Hackler asked about the pond on the subject property and if it was entirely located onlot 53IIMr Bagley confirmed that the pond is located entirely on lot 5 and that the responsibilityand maintenance of the pond would be the responsibility of the owner of lot 5Ms Hackler asked about the location of the unpermitted hog houses in relation to theproposed subdivision and to be shown their location on the preliminary platMr Bagley confirmed that the hog houses were located within the boundary of the subjectproject but southwest of the proposed subdivisionMr Hudson asked if there would be any conditions for the owner of lot 5 with concerns tobuffers and barriersMr Bagley stated that the responsibility and liability of the pond would be on the owneroflot 5Mr Hewitt addressed the former hog farm and that it was unpermitted and unregulatedMs Stephanie Norris, 102 South Third St, Smithfield, NC, Attorney representingPleasant Grove Holdings, LLC, an adjacent property owner, objected to the considerationof the proposed subdivision on the grounds that the initial application was improper and tothe submittal of a revised application Ms Norris spoke of the tabling of the subdivision atthe February 2022 Planning Board Meeting Ms Norris requested that the initialapplication be denied and that the revised application be tabled until the May 2022Planning Board MeetingOn behalf of the Applicant, Mr Hewitt responded to the concerns presented by Ms Norrisrequesting that the Planning Board continue with the consideration of the proposedsubdivisionMs Hackler asked Ms Slusser if procedure was followed and if this was an acceptableapplication Ms Slusser stated that the ultimate determination belongs to the PlanningBoard and further shared information from the County Ordinance Section 14-173Mr Marr shared that the revised application for change in ownership did not affect thenotices sent out to adjacent property owners The same twelve adjacent property ownerswere notified in both February 2022 and March 2022Chairman Letchworth asked staff to confirm that there was no material change to thepreliminary plat submitted with the revised application found during staff reviewMr Marr confirmed that there was no material change and that the only change was thechange of ownership of the subject propertyMs Holmes expressed concern that the initial application was not valid stating thatnumerous signatures were missing from owners4Mr Marr stated that the initial application was acceptable and that the final plat wouldrequire the signatures of all owners Ms Slusser added that the County does not do full titlework at the time of applicationMr Caldwell asked if the initial application went through the TRC process Ms Slusserstated that the revised application did not undergo a separate TRC process to which MrMarr confirmedMr Caldwell asked for staff to explain the makeup of the TRC Mr Marr stated that itconsists of Johnston County Public Schools, Johnston County Public Utilities, JohnstonCounty Environmental Health, Johnston County Emergency Services, and NCDOTMs Slusser restated the objection presented by Ms Norris to the Planning Board with MsNorris asking the consideration of the proposed subdivision be tabled to the May 2022Planning Board MeetingMs Andrea Bonvecchio, 127 West Hargett St, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC, Attorneyrepresenting Mr Don Byrd with Pleasant Grove Holdings, LLC, an adjacent propertyowner Ms Bonvecchio shared environmental concerns with the subject property,specifically concerning an abandoned hog waste lagoon Ms Bonvecchio providedadditional materials for the Planning Boards reviewMs Howard asked about the last known date of hogs present on the subject propertyMs Bonvecchio responded per conversation with the NC Division of Water Resources thatthe lagoon pond was in existence over 30 years ago and they do not rule out the possibilityof sludge or waste to be in the lagoonChairman Letchworth asked about the rules and regulations for the decommissioning of anabandoned hog waste lagoonMs Bonvecchio discussed the necessary steps needed to close a hog waste lagoon andreferenced additional information from the Natural Resources Conservation ServiceNRCS practice standardsChairman Letchworth asked about current actions being taken now that the NC Divisionof Water Resources was aware of the lagoonMs Bonvecchio was not aware of current actions being taken by the NC Division of WaterResourcesMs Davis asked about the responsibility of the unpermitted hog waste lagoon, specificallyif the responsibility lies with the original owner or current ownerMs Bonvecchio shared that these rules were strict liability unless a contract clause statesotherwise and the current owner would have the obligation to clean this5Ms Norris revisited her previous comments concerning the initial application and itsvalidityMr Hewitt responded to the concerns brought forth by the representatives of adjacentlandowners stating that the revised application was valid for consideration and referencedNC DEQs knowledge of the former hog waste lagoon on the subject propertyMs Holmes asked Mr Bagley about the absence of the hog waste lagoon on thepreliminary platMr Bagley responded that there may or may not be a hog waste lagoon on the subjectproperty and that they would obtain all required permits for development and follow allrequired rules and regulationsChairman Letchworth asked Mr Bagley about drainage patterns in the subdivisionMr Bagley responded that the water would flow south to the pond in one location and thenthere is a low area between lots 10 and 11 Mr Bagley stated the bottom portion of thesubject property is wetlandsMr Hewitt introduced Mr Lanny Clifton, 2701 Polenta Rd, Clayton, NC Mr Cliftonpresented two pictures of the pond taken last weekMr Moore asked for clarification that the pictures shown were not the pond located on lot5 in the preliminary plat Mr Clifton confirmed that it was not the pond located on lot 5,but was the area in question as the hog waste lagoonMs Byrd recused herself from voting on this subdivisionThere was no further discussionChairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staffrecommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff reportStaff recommendation is for approvalMr Caldwell asked Ms Slusser to recap the legal issues with this proposed subdivisionMs Slusser discussed County Ordinance Section 14-173 and the responsibilities of thePlanning Board given the two items in question the validity of the initial application andthe submittal date of the amended applicationMr Holmes asked Ms Slusser about opposition from ownership presented as a result ofthe initial applicationMs Slusser confirmed that she had received communication from Ms Norris that all of theproperty owners had not signed the initial application and that there was objection to theapplication moving forward In response, Ms Slusser contacted the Planning Department6The Planning Department then contacted the Applicant who then requested the hearing ofthe initial application be tabled until the March Planning Board MeetingMr Marr added that this information came to the attention of the Planning Department onthe day of the February Planning Board Meeting and the rationale to determine if the initialapplication was valid is that an owner with an authority signed the initial applicationMs Slusser clarified that the objection received came from a landowner near the parcelMr Hewitt asked staff about application practices Mr Marr confirmed that it is customaryfor the Planning Department to accept applications from an attorney, surveyor, or agentwhere there may be multiple owners Mr Marr further confirmed that the application doesnot require the signature of all ownersMr Hudson made a motion to approve the Helen Stephenson Tract The motion failed forlack of a secondUpon a motion by Ms Hackler to table the Helen Stephenson Tract until the April 19, 2022Planning Board Meeting, seconded by Ms Howard, the motion failed with a vote of 2-5with Mr Moore, Ms Holmes, Mr Caldwell, Ms Davis, and Mr Hudson in dissentUpon a motion by Ms Holmes to deny the Helen Stephenson Tract, seconded by MsDavis, the Helen Stephenson Tract was denied by a vote of 6-1 with Ms Howard in dissentat the March 15, 2022 Planning Board MeetingJohnson Tract-Black Creek RdOwner James JohnsonDeveloper Steel Bridge Crossing, LLCSurveyor Freedom Firm, PCAcreageLots 3321 acres, 32 lotsTax ID# 15I09027AAddress 5300 Block of Black Creek RdMr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above informationMr Carlos Bagley, 63 Watkins Rd, Clayton, NC, SurveyorEngineer, was present toanswer any questions the Board may have Mr Bagley stated the particulars of thedevelopmentMs Hackler asked about lots 1-13 and their location in relation to the riparian bufferMr Bagley responded that lots 1-13 construction would be in front of the riparian bufferand there was enough room to do soThere was no further discussion7Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staffrecommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff reportStaff recommendation is for approvalUpon a motion by Ms Hackler to approve Johnson Tract-Black Creek Rd, seconded byMr Moore, Johnson Tract-Black Creek Rd was approved by a unanimous vote of 8-0 atthe March 15, 2022 Planning Board MeetingConditions and Requirements[Planning]1 Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenanceOM Sec 7, L item 810 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75d312 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of clusterbox mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health13 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapprovedlot[NCDOT]14 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction15 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North CarolinaHighways16 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted ifany road improvements will be required8[Public Utilities]17 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required18 Stormwater Statement Required19 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present as well asany jurisdictional features and buffers20 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater management[Emergency Services]21 Provide No Parking signs on same side of street as hydrants22 Need fire hydrant distribution informationThere was a short 5 minute breakGrabtown Rd SubdivisionOwner Daniel Paula KornegayDeveloper RR T Development, LLCSurveyor Stocks EngineeringAcreageLots 7907 acres, 79 lotsTax ID# 04Ml5006A, 04N14030F, 04M15006CAddress 400 Block of Grabtown RdMr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above informationMr Ethan Averette, 801 E Washington St, Nashville, NC, representing the Surveyor andDeveloper, stated the particulars of the development and was present to answer anyquestions the Board may haveMs Davis asked about the ownership of the pond located between street C and street AMr Averette responded that the plan was for the ownership and shared maintenance of thepond to be the responsibility of the individual lot owners for the lots that had a portion ofthe pondMr Caldwell asked about the cemetery and its maintenance to which Mr Averette repliedthat it was a family owned cemeteryMs Hackler asked about the access easementMr Averette responded that the access easement was pre-existing and the plan was tochange the cemetery access from the new right-of-way before the final platMs Davis asked for clarification about the new access for the cemetery9lMr Averette confirmed that the preference is for access to the cemetery to come from streetD, but would require agreement from the familyMs Davis asked if the cemetery access would be on lot 36 to which Mr Averette statedthat the access would be separate from the lot The cemetery would be located in the frontof lot 36Ms Hackler asked about the need for three entrancesMr Averette explained that the preliminary plan shows tlu·ee separate tracks The top trackis separated from the other two tracks by the Whitley property The bottom two tracks areseparated by wetlands and buffer impactsMs Hackler asked about the separation distances between street A, access to the Whitleyproperty, street D, and street EMr Averette responded approximately 150 between street A and the Whitley property,250 between the Whitley property and street D, and 618 between street D and street EMs Davis asked if a turn lane would be needed on Grabtown Rd due to three separateentrancesMr Averette responded that NCDOT had not communicated the requirement of a turn laneMr Melvin Oliver, Jr, is an adjacent property owner who shared concerns regarding theimpact on schools and traffic, as well as concerns for future access to his property fromGrabtown RdMs Jan Whitley, is an adjacent property owner of 460 Grabtown Rd, Smithfield, NC MsWhitley asked questions about the owners of the subject property Ms Whitley sharedconcerns regarding the access easement to the cemetery, the lot sizes, traffic impact, andimpact on schools Ms Whitley also distributed information to the Board regarding thesurrounding areaMs Jena Andrews, 1128 Grabtown Rd, Smithfield, NC, is a nearby property owner whoasked about the owners of the subject property and shared similar concerns as previousspeakers Ms Andrews shared concerns regarding the impact on schools and the localvolunteer fire department, as well as noise and privacy issues generated by the proposedsubdivisionMr Jimmy Casey, 774 Hill Rd, Smithfield, NC, is an adjacent property owner to thesouth of the subject property Mr Casey expressed a hardship due to the proposedsubdivision and the need to install fencing along his property line adjacent to the proposedsubdivisionMs Barbara Huffman, 876 Grabtown Rd, Smithfield, NC, is an adjacent property ownerto the south of the subject property Ms Huffman expressed a concern for the wildlife thatwill be displaced by the proposed development Ms Huffman also expressed a concern forthe lack of notice and no opportunity to purchase some of the subject property, as well assimilar concerns as previous speakers Ms Huffman also asked if any studies had beenconducted concerning the impact on the wildlife and the impact on the creek at the southof the subject propertyMr Jeff Huffman, 876 Grabtown Rd, Smithfield, NC, is an adjacent property owner tothe south of the subject property Mr Huffman further addressed the concern of drainagewith the water running south into the Neuse River and across the back of his propertyChairman Letchworth asked Mr Averette if the preliminary plat was based on a soilscientistMr Averette confirmed that soils on the property were evaluated by Dan Bliley, a soilscientist, and further pointed out the areas labeled on the preliminary plat with unsuitablesoilsChairman Letchworth asked about county water to which Mr Averette confirmedChairman Letchworth asked if the southern border was shown as a blue lineMr Averette stated that it was not shown that way on the preliminary plat, but will delineateall streams and wetlands and provide buffers through the stormwater permitting processChairman Letchworth asked if there were any landscape buffers to which Mr Averetteresponded that there were none proposed at this timeChairman Letchworth asked if there would be an HOA to which Mr Averette affirmedMr Caldwell asked if there had been any discussion about a buffer around the WhitleypropertyMr Averette stated that there had not been any discussions, but the developer would bewilling to have those discussions Mr Averette also shared that the owners had changedand RRT Development, LLC closed on the property on February 14, 2022 which was afterthe initial application submission The NCDOT site distance requirement may be ofconcern for southern driveway and a site investigation by NCDOT will take place Thecemetery is owned by the Johnson family, so the developer will contact the current ownerconcerning cemetery access and would be willing to have a conversation with the Whitleysconcerning the removal of the existing 20 access easementMs Whitley shared that no living descendants maintain the cemetery and that she does soThere was no further discussionChairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staffrecommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff report MrMarr also stated that staff was not aware of a change in ownership until tonights meetingand an updated application has not been submitted11Ms Slusser addressed the change in ownership providing clarification and discussedCounty Ordinance Section 14-173Mr Caldwell referenced the Land Development Design Manual and asked about adevelopment making an existing land owner essentially a flag lotMs Slusser discussed County Ordinance Section 14-225 and Section 14-224Ms Davis asked about access to Mr Olivers property Ms Holmes followed up withaccess concerns for the multiple landlocked parcels behind the subject propertyMr Bryan Daughtry, 325 Grabtown Rd, Smithfield, NC, is a nearby property owner witha landlocked parcel behind the subject property Mr Daughtry shared that the Whitleyshave permitted access for them to access their propertyMs Whitley shared that they have allowed friends to use their driveway to access theirlandlocked properties and that the Whitleys maintain the driveway that is used as a path tothe other propertiesMs Davis asked about the width of the path and would it accommodate farm equipmentMr and Ms Whitley shared that larger farm equipment does not fit solely on the path anddoes need to use part of the subject property to access the landlocked propertiesChairman Letchworth asked about any requirements for a subdivision to allow access tolandlocked parcelsMs Slusser stated that there was not a specific design standard Mr Marr added that acondition could be added for the development to include a stubout street with adequate turnaround space for emergency vehicles instead of a cul-de-sacMs Hackler asked staff about entrances and minimum distances between entrancesMr Marr responded that entrances are limited to 500 separations per the LandDevelopment Design Manual and NCDOTs requirement is l 00 separationMs Howard asked about the possibility of asking the developer to add an easement alongthe top of the middle parcel for the landlocked property ownersMr Marr responded that it was a possibility and spoke about promoting interconnectivitybetween subdivisionsMr Caldwell expressed concern about the size of lots for the proposed subdivision andspoke of the 2009 Land Use Plan and the land use plan for this area is rural conservationMs Byrd expressed access concerns12Mr Moore asked Mr Daughtry about the current call volume for Brogden FireDepartment Mr Daughtry estimated 200-300 calls per year Mr Moore continued byexpressing concern for public safety when adding growth 111 a community with a volunteerfire department and no rescue Mr Moore then asked for clarification from ChairmanLetchworth about the guidelines for the Planning Board to use when making theirdecisionsChairman Letchworth responded that the Planning Board is to follow both Chapter 14 ofthe County Code of Ordinances and the Land Development Design Manual Ms Slusseraffirmed and also referenced County Ordinance Section 14-226 as it discussed access andcirculationMr Caldwell stated that the applicant must show hardship when creating a flag lot andshared a concern for the creation of a flag lot out of an existing propertyMs Holmes expressed access concernsMs Hackler expressed concerns for access, circulation, and entrance separationsStaff recommendation is for approvalUpon a motion by Ms Hackler to deny Grabtown Rd Subdivision, seconded by MrCaldwell, Grabtown Rd Subdivision was denied by a unanimous vote of 8-0 at the March15, 2022 Planning Board MeetingThere was a short 5 minute breakCrantock Rd Tract 2022Owner Sanders Greystone, LLC, Sanders Crantock, LLCDeveloper Jones Creek, LLCSurveyor Freedom Firm PCAcreageLots 35834 acres, 269 lotsTax ID# 15H07011Address 2618 Crantock RdMr Marr introduced the subdivision and referenced the above information Mr Marrdistributed copies of a recorded exempt plat showing that lots 1-9 included in the previoussubmittal have been removed and are not being proposed with this subdivision submittalLots 1-9 were all 1 O+ acres and exempt from subdivision standardsChairman Letchworth stated that the owners recorded lots 1-9 in an exempt subdivisionand those lots have been removed from the subdivision proposal to which Mr Marraffirmed13Mr Chip Hewitt, 101 Blackstone Ln, Selma, NC, Attorney representing the Applicant,discussed the exempt lots that are not a part of the proposed subdivision and was presentto answer any questions the Board may haveMr Carlos Bagley, 63 Watkins Rd, Clayton, NC, SurveyorEngineer, was present toanswer any questions the Board may have Mr Bagley stated the particulars of thedevelopment including access and circulation Mr Bagley shared that the ponds on thesouth side were placed in open space and the pond near the western edge was designatedas retained by owner and removed from the proposed development Mr Bagley alsodiscussed the Crantock House and its designation as retained by ownerMr Hudson asked for clarification of the location of the retained by owner property northof the pond to which Mr Bagley respondedMr Caldwell asked for clarification regarding the number of lots south of Crantock Roadand the number of mail kiosksMr Bagley responded that the intention is to include a large mail kiosk area in thedesignated amenity area The mail kiosk as shown on the preliminary plat is on a parcelthat would allow for parkingMs Holmes asked about two of the cemeteries given their own designated lots to whichMr Bagley affirmed and stated that the cemeteries would have open accessMs Hackler left the meetingMr Bagley addressed drainage issues and stated that they would work to mitigate anyissues through the stormwater planMr Hudson asked about interconnectivity between the exempt lots north of Crantock RdMr Bagley responded that there were no plans for interconnectivity between the exemptlotsMr Caldwell asked about the anticipated build out date to which Mr Bagley deferred toMr Bradley StancilMs Holmes asked about the distance between the two entrances on the southern portionbetween lot 1 and lot 138Mr Bagley responded that the distance is over 500 between the two entrances Mr Bagleyalso referenced the recorded exempt plat stating that a 16 access easement in the northwestcorner was included on the platMs Davis asked if the adjacent V AD was labeled on the preliminary plan Mr Bagleyresponded that it was not but it would be labeled on the final plat14Mr Bradley Stancil, 1415 Jackson-King Rd, Willow Spring, NC, stated that it would beapproximately a five year plan with three different phasesMs Miranda Oliver, 1193 Dickinson Rd, Smithfield, NC, an adjacent property ownerhad questions about the TIA findings and shared concerns for the impact on traffic MsOliver also expressed concerns for stormwater and drainage management problems MsOliver also shared concerns about the impact on schools with capped schools in the area,as well as the impact on emergency servicesChairman Letchworth shared the TIA findings and that the developer used the countysconsultant for the traffic study Chairman Letchworth also shared information about theprojected impact on local schools with current enrollmentsMs Davis shared that the proposed subdivision would be served by the Wilson Mills FireDepartment and Rescue SquadMs Oliver asked additional questions concerning the projected impact on schools and howthose projections are calculatedChairman Letchworth responded and shared that the Student Generation Ratio was 063for this proposed subdivisionMr Brooks Moore, Johnston County Public Schools, shared information regarding growthneeds including proposals for new schools and expansions to existing schoolsMr William Dias, 948 Dickinson Rd, Smithfield, NC, is an adjacent property owner whoshared concerns for the impact on traffic, law enforcement, fire departments, and schoolsMr Landon Langston, 1133 Dickinson Rd, Smithfield, NC, is a neighboring propertyowner and member of the local fire department Mr Langston shared concerns for the firedepartment and emergency needs Mr Langston also shared concerns for flooding in thearea and access concerns when needing to assist residentsMr Danny Langston, 843 Dickinson Rd, Smithfield, NC, is a neighboring propertyowner Mr Langston expressed concerns about having outgrown the current countyinfrastructure, as well as the impact on public schoolsThere was no further discussionChairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr stated the staffrecommended approval with the stated conditions and requirements in the staff reportMs Davis expressed gratitude for Mr Moores attendance and remarks about public schoolneeds Several other Board members followed with similar expressions of gratitudeMr Moore expressed concern for the strain placed on public safety volunteers as a resultof development15Staff recommendation is for approvalUpon a motion by Mr Moore to approve Crantock Rd Tract 2022, seconded by Ms Byrd,Crantock Rd Tract 2022 was approved by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at the March 15, 2022Planning Board MeetingConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenanceOM Sec 7, L item 810 Provide reverse frontage lot buffer along Crantock Rd, Freedom Rd, andDickinson Rd11 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75d313 TIA Recommendations To be completed by developerCrantock Road and Freedom Rd I Site Access A• Construct the northbound approach with one I ingress lane and one I egresslane• Provide stop-control for the northbound approachCleveland Road and Crantock Rd• Provide an exclusive northbound left-turn lane with a minimum of 100 feet ofstorage and appropriate deceleration and taper lengthCrantock Road and Site Access B Site Access C• Construct the northbound and southbound approaches with one I ingress laneand one 1 egress lane• Provide stop-control for the northbound and southbound approaches14 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of clusterbox mail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health1615 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapprovedlot[NCDOT]16 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction17 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North CarolinaHighways18 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted ifany road improvements will be required[Public Utilities]19 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required20 Stormwater Statement Required21 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present as well asany jurisdictional features and buffers A buffer call will be required if one has not beendone already22 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater management[Emergency Services23 Provide No Parking Fire Lane signs on the same side of the road as firehydrants24 Provide Flow Test25 Provide hydrant distribution layoutRezoning and Conditional Zoning CasesRezoning Case 22-06Rezoning Petition Agricultural Residential AR to Community Business CBTax ID 13D04005FOwner Adolpho Lemus AguileraApplicant Adolpho AguileraLocation 14900 block of NC Hwy 210 in the Pleasant Grove TownshipMr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed aboveMr Adolpho Aguilera, 3032 Old Fairground Rd, Angier, NC, ApplicantOwner, statedthe particulars of the requestThere was no further discussion17Chairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staffrecommendation of approval and presented a draft statement of consistency forconsiderationStaff Recommendation ApprovalUpon a motion by Ms Holmes to approve Rezoning Case 22-06, seconded by Mr Moore,Rezoning Case 22-06 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at theMarch 15, 2022 Planning Board MeetingRezoning Case 22-09Rezoning Petition Agricultural Residential AR to General Business-Conditional ZoningGB-CZTax ID 11M02008E 11M02007AOwner Renee P BakerApplicant Renee Greg BakerLocation 1900 Earpsboro Rd in ONeals TownshipConditional Zoning Request Indoor Outdoor storage for residentialMr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed aboveMr John Oglesby, 535 Barrette Lane, Wendell, NC, CSD Engineering, representing theApplicantOwner, stated the particulars of the requestChairman Letchworth asked about the intentions for rezoning all of the acreageMr Oglesby stated the immediate plans were to do a recombination using some from bothparcels into an approximate 12 acre parcel to be used for this request Mr Oglesby clarifiedthat this request is for rezoning of both existing parcels in their entirety with no plans forthe larger tract at this timeMs Davis asked about conditions regarding accessMr Oglesby stated that the site would be available to emergency services as necessary andthat times for customers has not been determinedMr Hudson and Ms Holmes discussed access times and recommended consideration bythe applicantMs Laverne Brown, 1812 Earpsboro Rd, Zebulon, NC, an adjacent property owner,expressed concerns about noise and traffic generated from the proposed development, aswell as landscaping and fencing Ms Brown also shared concerns regarding lighting andimpact on surrounding property valuesChairman Letchworth shared information about the condition requirements for a Class Blandscape buffer and 8 foot opaque fence18Mr David Cox, 166 Soaring Eagle Tri, Zebulon, NC, an adjacent property owner,expressed concerns for the impact on surrounding property values, drainage, wildlife, andcarbon footprintMr Oglesby stated that they are proposing one access off of Earpsboro Rd and that theproposal is for indoor storage facilities with outdoor storage facilities to accommodateboats and RVs Mr Oglesby also discussed lighting and landscaping with native optionsMr Oglesby stated that the preference would be to provide a berm and chain fence whereneededMs Davis asked about a number of storage lotsMr Oglesby stated that this was a preliminary plan with no predetermined number of lotsAfter tonights discussion, Mr Oglesby acknowledged areas that could be adjusted to meetthe shared concernsChairman Letchworth asked if the conditions provided by both the applicant and staff hadbeen read and if they agree to all to which Mr Oglesby confirmedThere was no further discussionChairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staffrecommendation of denial due to inconsistency with the comprehensive planStaff Recommendation DenialUpon a motion by Mr Hudson to approve Rezoning Case 22-09, seconded by Ms Davis,Rezoning Case 22-09 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at theMarch 15, 2022 Planning Board MeetingProposed Conditional Zoning District Information1 Please provide the purpose of the district, a project narrative, and a list ofproposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning districtApplicant The purpose of the district will be to allow amenities for theresidential areas in the surrounding areas The prima1·y use will be for indoorand outdoo1· storage for the local residents Other uses may include retail forselling antiques ice cream or soda shop with rural character There will beno strip malls and commercial development will be limited due to lack ofsanitary sewer The business will be ran by the owner land who is native tothe area2 Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning districtWithin a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements maybe added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the develop111ent may have onthe surrounding com111unity and the environment Stq[f, the Planning Board, and19Board of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the reviewprocess Please list any conditions that you propose, as the applicant, belowApplicant• Access to storage lot will be from new street; not existing road• Sc1·eening of storage lot will be done with native landscaping• Site plan shows wide street yards and buffers• Storage lot shall consist of crushed stone base with washed stonesurface to mitigate dust• Lighting shall be done as to not pollute the surrounding area;keeping lights shining on to lot, not perimeter• Indooroutdoor storage, antique shop and ice cream and soda shop areonly usesConditions1 Proposed uses IndoorOutdoor Storage, antique shop, Ice creamsoda shopProposed by applicant2 Screening of storage lot will be done with native landscaping Proposed byapplicant3 Wide street yards and buffers Proposed by applicant4 Storage lot shall consist of crushed stone base with washed stone surface to mitigatedust Proposed by applicant5 Lighting shall be done as to not pollute the surrounding area; keeping lights shiningon to lot, not perimeter Proposed by applicant6 24 Hour accessibility7 The development shall conform to all requirements of the Johnston County LandDevelopment Code8 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by the Planningand Zoning Department Staff9 A Class B 2 large trees, 3 small trees, and 9 shrubs every I 00 linear feet landscapebuffer shall be installed along all rezoning lines10 All signage shall comply with the Johnston County sign code11 If 17,000 SF of impervious area is planned or 1 acre will be disturbed, a stormwaterpermit will be required12 If one acre or more is planned to be disturbed, an erosion control permit will berequired13 The site is in the ESA and limited to 12 impervious area without storm watermanagement14 The maximum impervious area for the site is 80 with participation in the landdedication program and 50 limit without participation in the land dedication program15 The maximum nitrogen export for commercial sites in the ESA is 8 lbsacyr thatcan be brought down to 36 lbsacyr Anything over this threshold must be treated bystormwater devices on site16 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on plan if any are present as well as alljurisdictional features and buffers A buffer call will be necessary for the pond on theproperty to determine if it is buffered if one has not been done already2017 Provide fire hydrant distribution information and No Parking signs on same sideof street as hydrants18 An 8 foot opaque fence will be installed around storage area19 NCDOT driveway permit required20 All gates must be equipped with Knox access for Fire DepartmentRezoning Case 22-10Rezoning Petition Agricultural Residential AR to General Business-Conditional ZoningGB-CZTax ID 13C05004AOwner Steve Kerry FinchApplicant Steve Kerry FinchLocation 25 acres of a 1332 acre tract located at 2006 County Line Rd in PleasantGrove TownshipConditional Zoning Request Parking Maintenance of Business VehiclesMr Marr introduced the case and referenced the information listed above Mr Marr alsoshared that the proposed site was submitted as a potential zoning violation in January 2022Mr Steve Finch and Ms Kerry Finch, 2600 County Line Rd, Angier, NC,ApplicantsOwners, stated the particulars of the request Mr Finch asked about condition#6 and provided information about existing fencing and landscapingChairman Letchworth asked about the current use of the property and the intended use ofthe propertyMr Finch responded that he runs a grading business with his son and uses one tractor trailerand one dump truckMr Marr shared information from the Land Development Design Manual concerningallowable modifications to conditions concerning fencing and landscapingThe Board recommended the ApplicantOwner review the conditions for any possiblerevisions There was discussion concerning conditions #4, #6, #8, #9, # 11 , # 12, and #14There was no further discussionChairman Letchworth asked for the staff recommendation Mr Marr provided a staffrecommendation of denial due to inconsistency with the comprehensive plan and historyof violationStaff Recommendation DenialUpon a motion by Ms Holmes to approve Rezoning Case 22-10, seconded by Mr Hudson,Rezoning Case 22-10 was recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of 7-0 at theMarch 15, 2022 Planning Board Meeting21Proposed Conditional Zoning District Information1 Please provide the purpose of the district, a project narrative, and a list ofproposed land uses to be allowed within the conditional zoning districtApplicant The proposed land use will support the parking and maintenanceand repairs of business property on the premises2 Conditions to apply to the conditional zoning districtWithin a Conditional Zoning District, additional conditions and requirements maybe added which may assist in mitigating the impacts the development may have onthe surrounding community and the environment Staff, the Planning Board, andBoard of Commissioners may propose additional conditions during the reviewprocess Please list any conditions that you propose, as the applicant, belowApplicant• Changes to outdoor lighting will not be made without approval• Natural preservation shall be maintained thru natural property buffersand landscaping to preserve residential appeal• Signagc of business advertising will be limited to entrance area only;Signagc dimensions arc 24 inches x 36 inches• Business operations will be conducted between the hom·s 7am-7pm,Monday-Saturday, with no business conducted on SundayConditions1 Permitted Uses Parking and maintenance of business vehicles Proposedby Applicant2 No changes to outdoor lighting without approval Proposed by Applicant3 24 x 36 business signage at entrance only Proposed by Applicant4 Business hours 7am 7pm 6 am-Midnight Monday through SaturdaySunday Proposed by Applicant5 Applicant shall submit a detailed site plan for review and approval by thePlanning and Zoning Department Staff6 Installation of a Class B landscape buffer along all rezoning lines 1 largetrees, 2 small trees, and 6 shrubs every one hundred 100 linear feet Landscapingshall be placed on the outside of any fences Existing vegetation may be used7 All buildings andor development must comply with rules enforced byFederal, State and Local agencies8 No more than 15 commercial vehicles, to include trailers parked on site9 Lighting shall be dark sky and engineered so as not to shine onto adjacentproperties10 All outdoor storage shall be enclosed in an 8 opaque fence or sufficientvegetative screening11 NCDOT driveway permit required as well as the paving of the driveway apronthrough the ROW, at minimum12 200 of spacing required on all driveways from inside edge to inside edge2213 Any new structures will require a fire hydrant to be installed14 Knox box must be on gates for Fire Department access15 If 17,000 SF of impervious area is proposed to be added, a stormwater permit willbe required16 If an acre or more of disturbance is proposed, an erosion control permit will berequired17 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on plan if any are present as well as alljurisdictional features and buffers18 Landscape Buffer on eastern p1·operty line may be placed on interior ofexisting fenceItems in bold were changed by tl,e Planning Board during the meetingDiscussion ItemsThe Board welcomed Ms Howard to the Planning BoardThe meeting ended at 11 02 pmRespectfully submitted byJodie Gay, Secretary for the Board23Bailey EstatesOwner Troy Jodi BaileyDeveloper Troy Jodi BaileySurveyor Jimmy C Barbour, PLSTax ID# 15H08004AAddress 5478 NC Hwy 210LatitudeLongitude 3550555, -7844767Locational Data 5478 NC Hwy 2 10 in Smithfield Township The proposed subdivision is served bythe Wynn Fire District and the Wilsons Mills Rescue SquadSite Data 3955 acres, 3 lots, maximum allowable density 57, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required 3,000, traffic count 3700 vpd 2020, property owners notified 8Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 065 Therefore, Bailey EstatesSubdivision will generate approximately 2 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl1 e tio II owmg 1 s ba sed 011 ti le O U t - 0 f- C apac1· 1 y T a bl e prov1 de dby OREODbdrict CmHtcitl E11rollme11tWest Smithfield ES 540 463Swift Creek MS 826 748Cleveland HS 1274 1785• CTP This portion of NC Hwy 210 appears on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as anexisting boulevard needing improvement• E11viro11111e11tally Sensitive District This parcel is not within the ESA, however a floodplainappears on a portion of the parcel• Further Subdividing will require 50 wide Right-of-way constructed to NCDOT stmulardsStaff Recommendation Preli111inc11y approval subject to the following conditions and requirementsConditions and Requirements[PlanningI Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 Existing and new easement be either paved or improved with compacted stone base7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Certificate for street maintenance OM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Show shared driveway access easement and provide statement for shared maintenance onFinal Plat11 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording12 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 3I 3 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU sha ll not obstruct the operation and maintenance of uti lity servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]14 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]15 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction16 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NCDOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to Notth CarolinaHighways17 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required18 Additional subdivision of remaining parcels may require road improvements fromNCDOT[Public Utilities]19 If 17,000 SF of impervious area is proposed to be added, a stormwater permit will berequired20 If an acre or more of disturbance is proposed, an erosion control permit will be required~ • DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 13068 1 in 108901 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISApril 14, 2022SURVEYORS OISCANER,~~~t~~U1° - --- a,~~a~~~s ~~,°-~ ~~- ~ ~ ,,; ,, ,_,# , 1M ,,,,,,,_,, ~edlctlo,t _, khni,lo,,c-ty_,, ,,~«JcptW~~ -lit my lrM -L # tlo4h ~~ ~ 1lcol# di •ffHt ,,,,,,~~~ ~o-r~o--1-W----tlH-Ult1~~~€;~~--~;;,,~;}_~~~-;; , ___ ,, __ _, _,, ,,, ___ , ~ -,rot;ttM,- ~~ ~t ~-10 an__a__A,_,M,_•_, ;~;; arnors--~,, ~ ttA~,,,~~~~~~ r ,_ f;~~ ~ ,b~qi ~-»~w~--wo• r·~· t ~;-;~·~ ~- #,t-1 ---t•r•---~aJJUOAS ~·- ~-- -~ ··J 6d,t -,,~~~-c--~~z, i -,~·-··-_·;7~~,, n-~-o,- ~____ « ,_ ,_,_, _~_~, r_ -- ~~ ,• ~ W ~ • • ,6, , ____ _,,,,,,,-w,,,rrw,, __ ,__ ~~- ~----,,,--Q-,,clll1,r- ~~-- ,Nb ~ - ______ ,IC,,,,,__,_, ----- ,• ~- ,,-~--~T,OQllfllt_,,___ ~• l 1f ,_,_Z,,~,r,u--i_-__ ,,,,_, ,~wc _o -n_-,_~y,_ _- A ~·-f - r~ · ~I,Y,·t· Iy ~§~ IiIib16~ nfd,,~1IIIIIII ; § ~~;~i~J~~ ~~ ~~i~~ ~§ ~~b ~I • i~ -~~ I~C r-- ~ e~~ 1 ·~I, I~JJ-~ i~ ~ ~~sl~~_ _ ,___~11t~~IIIIN£ff1£1{C£S ~~ ;12~A~~~1g PARCEL I HO jj{080}4Aij;~C~i o~C -X~z@l11CAUddR0W MfICP6PINGI HC1tJ3IY a,rr,y 1HA T DC SUIJtJNIOH PLA 1 HOU,HUrCON IUS «DI rQMO TO COIIPtY WTH »I SIJlltMION-110 FOR ,111¥T COUNTY, ~ TH CARCU,I, ANOTHAT 1HtS ,tAT HAS IJllN APfllWWO UY THC lltANNC OOAltDRlt «COROINC IN 1C 011CC or THC ICQSIU or DCQY; orOfllSrrJN COUNTYo,,,c JOHNSTCN COlMTY ltANNOrNFr~~~f~fll~STWKL,~~~~~T~t; 1HfS SfJ}fIIIStt at DC JASC1 a, DCTMLD LOT IYALUMION lJllCN NTAPPtJCA r,a,, AND ~ or ltANS r011 1fc,,osa vst ,,,,~ WIN 1£CUA11Ci#S rotter AT 1HIS 11Uf Jr PnUITTHG J1f~ CDt1111CA DCN 1 ~ KY NID canRS NO ~ , ~I ~ 9DAIC JOHNSTON CCIJIITY HCAIIH OITIOAJ I I-1~ ~ ,---- I---I;JODI and TROY BAILEY I i--l VICINITY MAP • NO SCALEIDB 5928 PC JJ9PARCEL JO NO 1iHOtlfXHAAREA REl,ANINC PER PB 91, PC 244J17 ACRESNEW JO ACCSS AND~ tJTJUTY £ASEMEN7I II NF JODI BAILEY OB 5928, PC J9 PB Jf T,,i 211 I II II II III _,,,~I _,,, _,,, I _,,,--f ~I, -;;;-}, _,,, _,,, I 2,1 NF e,,•~~f•-- RUTH LEE-~~ W _,,, __ , ••1 I I HOBBS _, ~ ,-,-;;;i~ NF 08 88 PC 160 l4P- HUGH BRYAN PS8- ~- ,~ ~ PC 7t; ¾ ~~ HOBBS, JR - ~ DO 916, PC 122 _~ -~~ PB 85, PC 76 ~CRJO N-OTE NAO 198J 2011CCOID 12 ACOMOMD FACTOR- aJ9J87S1-V ~-- ;, , ~~ ,#~ ~i ;t 9 , ,-;; NOTCS I, N£W LOIS SHOIIN ON THIS PLAT AN£A,,- l , ~ 1~ NOT LOCA TEO 1w1HJN mE 100 mN1 ~~;_ ~· , ~ t, iRC ;-~OCcA TYS SM;A~ As cfDJEWEL Y HOOKS ~, 14,r,6 iil O PANEL NO J1201cc,oo x ° c - 20- 1808 621• PC876 f , o ~,j,I ~ z1 2 NO POINTS I1£N£ SET ON FOiNO ON THIS ~~54- ii?_; ~ ~ PNWIIINAIIY PUI r ALL INFORMA 1CN SHOltN ,l ,z ~e·•D1-o~ci1G, 1s TAK£ FROM 11£F£R£11CE0 PLATS OR oaos ~i l~~~~l~~n ct ~ ~, , eac r-~~~~~~~~iiiis t g ~ I i~~~a~i;~ z ~ ~ JIAlr C DMilCUt PNOfESSiCNAL JAN0 ~ IN,, L--2~CVfrtrY THAr fHs MAT JS or A SLWWY fHAT ~ fl A SllOOIWSICWor LAND t11HIN nc JMlA or A COUNrr Olt MUNIOPAUrr 17IAT HAS ~ ti ALL OISTANC£S AM NOIIIZONTAL CROIJNO 0STANCESAR£, BY COORDINA IE ll£THOO0i ----10-0 ---200 JOO ll,~~1, i~~~f ci~ 1 ~ ~ 5 ~h~1~i~1~i ·1~~ 11~ ei1~,~ ~ ; o~~i~tl~~~~l~i~~ b ~~~j§~-~J~i~I~~~ z ~ ~~~ ~ ll~i,j~11~~~~~i ,~,~~§~~t ~-AN GWOMllWIX THAT ~CS , NtCDs or L4NO IN ACCOHOA1CC WTH;,-17,,; {r1 THIS MAP IS NOT TO SCALE CRAPHIC CAL£ r--100•JANY C IIMflJUI ~ ~ SUIOf10 uaMiC No C-28» PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP FOR,IN l1ltC HYOlfAHTDASICD UNCS- ------------ 1IICS NOT tlfMlrZ IW WAf»sfftkJ~0 DaS11HC IRON TAK lOIJNDCOi DJSJ1HC ClJNCltt1C JlHAIOT FOUIDCA-·-· CCNTrR,,c er ltOOVK DtlS11NC JIAJfKER-KALDN NAIL raJNOlRltS Dl11NC RAIIJ«JN SPilC FXH0A 0111NCllfONUCn;JtJNDRIJS p JJfON RC1IM scr wm lflD ,u_--nc CAPCCS OtSTINC C0110N S1tNOL FOIJIOCMN £»IWC IIACHCIIC NAIi FOIINUH IJACNCnc NAJI ;erOttl ~11NC ° R;lJAlf ltltS RMAOA1 i1l«C SC,N,lr NJWCRrORJIOflr~ ~,~~Otrfttlt~wcr-;~fCP COAllVfCt lCINT fIICAl ltDClltNtXO stXJiltCCCSS COmJH S11HOIC SC11W----•-----ltJCHTDr lli4Y0-to UPON CIWtilC DCTtMIIN,r,llOH nit ~Pft0PCRTY INDICATCO ON lHt MAl OCC NO UC IN nrtM-nltM JCQAL 100 ¥R f000 KAZAAO AAtA CCCOl4iUMlY PAAQ N9J7201o,c;,400 IC dotcl G- 20-,201JIMMY BARBOUR SURVEYING, PAJIMMY C BARBOUR, PLS, GSI~ 213 S SE~~ STREET ~ ro~ 1,l fHFJlll COIINfY JOHNSTON STAnNCP 0 BOX 28 ~------1-,-----,--------1SMilHFIELO, NC 27577 SVIMD IY SE£ NOTE 2 _, ___ , -·-·-··Qlo060-0042 0 10-000•3013 DATC ~~ CAJL 0fArtNCHOE_l0il~1~oomBAILEY ESTA TESOltNYt NF JODI NID TROY 8AIL£ttwAIIN DY CINDA S LASSITERr ,nn· -0~Powhatan Road TractOwnel Powhatan Paltnels LLCDevelope1· Powhatan Paltnels LLCSulveyol Adams Hodge Engineeling, PCTax ID # 05J06003Addless 2400 Block of Powhatan RdLatitudeLongitude 3561533, -7838872Locational Data Powhatan Rd SR 1901 just southeast of Pocahontas Trail in Clayton TownshipThe proposed subdivision is served by the Wilsons Mills Fire District and the Clayton Rescue SquadSite Data 13317 acres, 8 lots, maximum allowable density 13, water service sha ll be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required 8,000, traffic count not available, property owners notified 14Additional lnfolmationo Sctool District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 072 Therefore, PowhatanTract Subdivision will generate approximately 6 K-12 students split amongst the threeschools below0 Tl1 e tio II owmg ts b ased on ti1 e O U t -0f - C apac1·t y T a bl e prov,d e dby OREODistrict Capacity E11rolme11tPowhatan ES 720 674Riverwood MS 1148 1052Clayton HS 1976 1975• CTP This pottion of Powhatan Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportation Planas needing improvementStaff Recommendation Preli111i11mJ approval subject to the followi11g co11ditio11s and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]1 Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Ce1tificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 810 Fee-in-lieu of ope11 space shall be paid prior to recording11 Provide utility easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 312 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health]13 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lot[NCDOT]14 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction15 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NC DOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North CarolinaHighways16 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be required[Public Utilities]17 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required18 Stormwater Statement Required19 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present as well as anyjurisdictional features A buffer call will be required to set the buffer start point20 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater management[Emergency Services]21 Provide No Parking signs on one side of the road22 Provide fire flow report23 Pull fire hydrant out of cul-de-sac • DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 13068 1 in 108901 feet{The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 12 x 11 size sheet with no page scalingJohnston County GISApril 14, 2022st-VlON-IT~YM-A,PDEVELOPERAPPLICANTPOWHATAN PARTNERS LLCPO BOX 189CLAYTON NC 27528CONTACT 919345-6729MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLANFORPOWHATAN TRACTINJOHNSTON COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINASHEET INDEXSHEET TITLE SHEET NoEXISTING CONDITIONS C101SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT C201PRELIMINARY SOILS LAYOUT C202~~E~ INARYJ°-CII0, 11¥0JltOTIOllI 0 f~MlU WI COll1-0lwttJIIO~o,cUOllCoctlTYGII D,lt,1U,012 rNllLltJOIWAnOu tKOl,l,OtGTCll~ lli ,,u 1,u ~ 1• ~~r ~~~i~~ gc,o~o-wo [ MIIOINtHtAlOft~ -- J•l1U 1,IJWlt~lVAIUOlIOrlllllOJTt,t, f[ ltllC,llJ°lC141Al ~ 11Ute, lO IICtt»1, , ,_Y, «u11tn1co,cIAl-il ADAMS HODGE ---lN,~i;~~PC---POWHATAN RD TRACTJ011ClOHCOUNTY,_JtOITlIC,WOt1NAMARCH 1ST, 2022 mro~ NflfHMOd SNOlll0NOJ JNlSIX3,Ul• t,~ftC, K 1,I - ~ ·• Cll1~MLO~,~ ,, JllltNllllrt1, ,l---Od EJ NltHl3NI D N 51---,~ -~~IEIEJCIOH S swvcn,I0 70~ NiliHMOdiVld AWN1Yil13~dV Nld 311 · IltJ~I••it;~ ---Jd 1 EINltt33NIEJN3--- Ji1I~~t~; ElfJCCH S SIIIVC~I I I II I i •i - ~ ; ~ ~ § i -I lI IOvO~ NvlvHMOdnOAVlSllOSAm,Nl1113~dMarvin Smith TractOwner Marvin Smith TrustDeveloper Steel Bridge Crossing, LLCSurveyor Freedom Firm, PCTax ID# 01F11077BAddress 600 Block Surles RdLatitudeLongitude 3535561, -7852727Locational Data Surles Rd SR 1104 north of Beasley Estates Dr in Banner Township Theproposed subdivision is served by the Banner Fire District and the Benson Rescue SquadSite Data 2025 acres, 16 lots, maximum allowable density 29, water service shall be provided byJohnston County public water and lots will be served by individual septic tanks, open space providedfee-in-lieu, open space required 16,000, traffic count 470 vpd 2016, property owners notified 8Additional Informationo School District The Student Generation Ratio SGR is 058 Therefore, Marvin SmithTract Subdivision will generate approximately IO K-12 students spl it amongst the threeschools below0 Tl1 e fio II owmg 1 s ba se d on t I1 e O ut-o f- C apac1ty T a ble prov, de dby OREDDistrict Capacitv E11rol111e11tBenson ES 568 608Benson MS 624 487South Johnston HS 1297 1313• CTP This portion of Surles Rd does not appear on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan asneeding improvementStaff Recommendation Preli111i1101J approval subject to the followi11g co11ditio11s and requirementsConditions and Requirements[Planning]I Complete flood plain information2 Metes bounds3 Certifications4 Entrance sign street signs5 Street name approval6 All lots shall access internal streets7 Cul-de-sac lots must have 40 road frontage8 Complete improvements or provide performance guarantee9 Provide final plat Street Disclosure Statement Cettificate for street maintenance DM Sec7, L item 8I 0 Fee-in-lieu of open space shall be paid prior to recording11 Provide util ity easements along all lot lines in accordance with LDC Sec 14-75 d 312 Coordinate with the US Postal Service for the design of and utilization of cluster boxmail receptacle unitsa CBU shall not impede the flow of trafficb CBU shall not obstruct the operation and maintenance of utility servicesc CBU shall meet ADA and Fire Code requirements[Environmental Health13 Approval of all lots for onsite sewage disposal or statement for each unapproved lotNCDOT]14 A driveway permit and subdivision design approval must be obtained prior toconstruction15 All design aspects of the plans shall comply with the current NC DOT StandardSpecifications for Roads and Structures, NCDOT Subdivision Roads MinimumConstruction Standards, and Policy on Street and Driveway Access to Notth CarolinaHighways16 It will be determined at the time the driveway permit application is submitted if any roadimprovements will be requiredPublic Utilities]17 Stormwater Erosion Control Permits Required18 Stormwater Statement Required19 Wetlands should be delineated and shown on the plan if any are present as well as anyjurisdictional features A buffer call will be required to set the buffer statt point ordetermine if the soil feature on site is subject20 Property is limited to 15 impervious area without stormwater managementEmergency Services]21 Provide No Parking signs on one side of the road22 Provide fire flow report23 Provide fire hydrant distribution informationr---- • DISCLAIMER Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented hereScale 1 6534 1 in 54451 feetThe scale is only accurate when printed