June 8, 1998 - 7:00 PM - County Board of Commissioners Meeting Minutes (Rezoning)

June 8, 1998 - ZoningJune 8, 1998The Johnston County Board of Commissioners met in regular session Monday, June 8, 1998, at 700pm in the Commissioners Room, Johnston County Courthouse Annex, Smithfield, North Carolina, withthe following membersPresent Norman C Denning, Chairman, James W Cash, Vice Chairman, Jerry F Wood,DDS, Eleanor N Creech, Cookie Pope, Thomas M Moore and James H Langdon, JrAbsent NoneAlso Present Richard B Self, County Manager, Mark Payne, Attorney, and Joyce H Ennis,Clerk to the BoardThe Chairman called the meeting to order and the following business was transacted1 Public Hearing - Rezoning CasesAdvertised - The Smithfield Herald - May 29, June 5, 1998Certified letters were mailed to adjoining property owners on May 28,1998, and notices wereposted at the locations on May 28, 1998The Chairman opened the public hearing and invited anyone who wished to comment on thefollowing rezoning casesCase 327 Petition to rezone approximately 4887 acres located on Peele Farm Road SR 2384 inMicro Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 Owner andApplicant Barney Hiram HinnantCal Genereux, Planning Director, indicated the property on the GIS map and noted it is located nextto US 301 and the railroad, south of Kenly The parcel partly lies in the Micro ETJBoard members asked if Micro has been contacted concerning this request Mr Genereux stated hisoffice has not contacted Micro, however, they did explain to the applicant that all plans and maps of thesurveyor and developer would have to also be approved by MicroIt was the consensus of the Board that it would be better to delay action on this matter until theplanning staff can personally work with Micro, since a portion of the property lies within theirjurisdiction The owner, Mr Hinnant, was present and agreed to a 30 -day postponementCase 328 Petition to rezone approximately 1737 acres located on Corbett Road SR 1554 inClayton Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 Owners andApplicants Dawn P Evans, Thomas Duane Poole, Jr, Jenny GilbertMr Genereux pointed out this property on the GIS map and noted the tract is in an existing waterdistrict The surrounding zoning is AR -R -40, Mobile Home Park District, and existing R -20 The parcelalso lies within the 1200 corridor for the Clayton Bypass, however, the Department of Transportation hasnot, at this time, notified the County to stop rezoning in this area The planning board recommendedapprovalOwner TD Poole stated that according to the map of the proposed bypass route, only a very smallportion of this property would be affectedCase 330 Petition to rezone approximately 7048 acres located at the intersection of ClevelandRoad SR 1010 and Ogburn Road SR 1579 in Smithfield Township fromAgricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 Owner and Applicant CBG RAH, IncMr Genereux indicated the property on the GIS map and noted the surrounding zoning is ARR -40The tract is located in the Airport Height Overlay District, and this would be required to be noted on theplat if approvedRudolph Howell, one of the owners, stated the property is actually east of the runway district andshould not be a problem•Case 332 Petition to rezone approximately 2057 acres located at the intersection of Old DrugstoreRoad SR 1524 and Interstate 40 in Cleveland Township from Agricultural Residential40 to Residential 30 Owners and Applicants William D Parker, Jr and E O AdamsAgent J C Johnson, JrMr Genereux pointed out the parcel on the GIS map and stated the surrounding zoning is ARR -40and R -30 The tract is in a water district and is adjacent to property already zoned R -30Developer Sonny Johnson stated this property would be the last phase of an existing R -30subdivision In response to a question from Commissioner Cookie Pope, Mr Johnson stated there are noplans at present for leaving open spaces or recreational areas in the developmentCase 333 Petition to rezone approximately 3110 acres located on Devils Racetrack Road SR1009 in Ingrams Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Heavy Industrial -Special Use District Owner Johnston Community College Agent Wade TeagueMr Genereux directed the Boards attention to this property on the GIS map and noted thesurrounding zoning is ARR -40 The parcel to be rezoned would be approximately 31 acres at the rearof a 542 acre tract on Devils Racetrack RoadEngineer Stephen Sanderson, with Southwind Surveying and Engineering who represents theCommunity College, stated only 10 acres in the middle of the tract would be used with the remaining 21acres representing a 500 buffer on all sides The vehicles that would use the property would use a paththat would exit onto Devils Racetrack away from any existing residential areaCase 334 Petition to rezone approximately 4019 acres located on Cornwallis Road SR 1525 inCleveland Township from Residential 30 to Residential 10 Owner William D Parker,Jr Agent Linwood E Byrd, SurveyorMr Genereux pointed out the property on the GIS map and noted the surrounding zoning is ARR-40, General Business 1- Special Use District, and R -30 The property is located approximately one -halfmile from the intersection of Cornwallis Road with NC Hwy 1010 near the Cleveland School campusCommissioner Cookie Pope asked if the development would include open spaces and recreationalareas Linwood Byrd, surveyor, responded there are no specific plans, however, the development wouldfollow the requirements of the County for R -10 zoning2 Decisions on Rezoning CasesCase 327 Petition to rezone approximately 4887 acres located on Peele Farm Road SR 2384 inMicro Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 Owner andApplicant Barney Hiram HinnantRezoning Case 4 327 was tabled until the Town of Micro is contacted concerning the area withinthe Micro ETJCase 328 Petition to rezone approximately 1737 acres located on Corbett Road SR 1554 inClayton Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 Owners andApplicants Dawn P Evans, Thomas Duane Poole, Jr, Jenny GilbertUpon a motion by Commissioner James W Cash, seconded by Commissioner James H Langdon,Jr, and carried by unanimous vote, the Board approved rezoning case 328 for Dawn P Evans, ThomasD Poole, Jr and Jenny Gilbert of 1737 acres located on Corbett Road SR 1554 in Clayton Townshipfrom Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30Case 330 Petition to rezone approximately 7048 acres located at the intersection of ClevelandRoad SR 1010 and Ogburn Road SR 1579 in Smithfield Township fromAgricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 Owner and Applicant CBG RAH, Inc79Upon a motion by Commissioner Jerry F Wood, seconded by Commissioner Thomas M Moore,and carried by unanimous vote, the Board approved rezoning case 330 for CBG and RAH, Inc of 7048acres located atthe intersection of Cleveland Road SR 1010 and Ogburn Road SR 1579 in SmithfieldTownship from Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30Case 332 Petition to rezone approximately 2057 acres located at the intersection of Old DrugstoreRoad SR 1524 and Interstate 40 in Cleveland Township from Agricultural Residential40 to Residential 30 Owners and Applicants William D Parker, Jr and E O AdamsAgent J C Johnson, JrCommissioner James H Langdon, Jr moved the Board approve rezoning case 332 for William DParker, Jr and E O Adams of 2057 acres at the intersection of Old Drug Store Road SR 1524 andInterstate 40 in Cleveland Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Residential 30 CommissionerJames W Cash seconded the motion, which carried by the following voteAyes Norman C Denning, James W Cash, Jerry F Wood, Eleanor N Creech, Thomas MMoore, and James H Langdon, JrNo Cookie PopeCase 333 Petition to rezone approximately 3110 acres located on Devils Racetrack Road SR1009 in Ingrams Township from Agricultural Residential 40 to Heavy Industrial SpecialUse District Owner Johnston Community College Agent Wade TeagueUpon a motion by Commissioner Thomas M Moore, seconded by Commissioner Jerry F Woodand carried by unanimous vote, the Board approved rezoning case 333 for Johnston Community Collegeof 3110 acres located on Devils Racetrack Road SR 1009 in Ingrams Township fromAgricultural Residential 40 to Heavy Industrial Special Use DistrictCase 334 Petition to rezone approximately 4019 acres located on Cornwallis Road SR 1525 inCleveland Township from Residential 30 to Residential 10 Owner William D Parker,Jr Agent Linwood E Byrd, SurveyorCommissioner Jerry F Wood moved the Board approve rezoning case 334 for William D Parker,Jr of 4019 acres located on Cornwallis Road SR 1525 in Cleveland Township from Residential 30 toResidential 10 Commissioner Thomas M Moore seconded the motion, which carried by the followingvoteAyes Norman C Denning, James W Cash, Jerry F Wood, James H Langdon, Jr, ThomasM Moore and Eleanor N CreechNo Cookie Pope3 Public Hearing - Special Use PermitAdvertised - The Smithfield Herald - May 29, June 5, 1998Certified letters were mailed to adjoining property owners on May 28, 1998, and notices wereposted at the locations on May 28, 1998The Chairman opened the public hearing and invited anyone who wished to comment on thefollowing request for special use permitCase 333 Special Use Permit for sand mining on approximately 3110 acres located on DevilsRacetrack Road SR 1009 in Ingrams Township Owner Johnston CommunityCollege Agent Wade TeagueMr Genereux explained the Community College wishes to dig a 10 -acre pond on the property, andthe rezoning and special use permit are required to sell the sand from the project The pond would be usedas a teaching facility for the college and eventually would become a recreational area as well Proceedsfrom the sand and any timber sales would go to Community College scholarshipsAlthough several paths run through the property with one path exiting onto Devils Racetrack Roadnear an existing subdivision, the College has agreed to direct all vehicles to use another path that exitsfurther north away from any residential developmentL61-1iIn response to a question from Commissioner Eleanor N Creech, Dr John Tart, President of theCommunity College, stated plans for the facility include walking trails, wildlife training, plant and wildlifeinformation, nature trails with feeding stations for animals and animal observation areas Also, the pondwill be used for teaching scuba diving to law enforcement agenciesThere being no further comments from the audience, the Chairman addressed the following questionsto Mr Genereux concerning Special Use Permit Case 3331 Mr Genereux, was a pre - application conferences held by the Planning Department with the applicanton this case Response Yes, Sir2 Did the applicant meet the requirements at that time by providing a sketch plan illustrating thelocation, size and major design elements of the development of this site Response Yes, Sir3 Did your department prepare an analysis of the application including conformity with zoning,subdivision, soil erosion and sedimentation, and health regulations Response Yes we did4 Did the planning board advertise and hold a hearing open to the public Response Yes, Sir5 Was written certification sent to the adjacent property owners in a timely fashion Response Yes Sir6 What is the recommendation of the planning board Response The planning board recommendedapproval of this case based on findings of factChairman Are conditions attached to these cases Response No, SirChairman Mr Genereux, please read to this Board the summary of the evidence supporting theplanning boards recommendations Response Mr Genereux read the following evidence of support foundby the planning board for Case 333a Zoning lot is located within a prime soil area for sand miningb Zoning lot and resultant sand mine are located sufficient distances from public road andexisting residences to minimize adverse effects7 Did you notify the applicant in writing of the planning boards recommendation Response Yes,Sir8 Is the applicant aware that if the Commissioners deny the request that no application can beaccepted for the same or a similar use affecting the same property for a period of twelve 12months Response Yes, Sir9 Is the applicant aware that the right of appeal to the Board of Adjustment must be exercised withinthirty 30 days of this date Response Yes, Sir10 Is the applicant aware that the permit will expire at the end of twelve 12 months if it is not usedas permitted within that time period Response Yes, SirThere being no further comments, the Chairman closed the public hearing4 Decision on Special Use PermitCase 333 Special Use Permit for sand mining on approximately 3110 acres located on DevilsRacetrack Road SR 1009 in Ingrams Township Owner Johnston CommunityCollege Agent Wade TeagueUpon a motion by Commissioner James H Langdon, Jr, seconded by Eleanor N Creech and carriedby unanimous vote, the Board authorized the Planning Department to issue a special use permit toJohnston Community College for sand mining on 3 1 10 acres on Devils Racetrack Road in IngramsTownship, based on the following findings of fact1 Zoning lot is located within a prime soil area for sand mining2 Zoning lot and resultant sand mine are located sufficient distances from public road andexisting residences to minimize adverse effects5 Proposed Subdivision OrdinanceThe Board discussed the Proposed Revised Subdivision Ordinance, which has been recommendedby the planning boardPlanner Dave Roesler reviewed with the Board the major proposed changesReorganization of the order of the sections into a more logical progression and included a•provision related to subdividing commercial lands• Wording added to provide a clear direction to the design of a subdivision including thefollowing Access and circulation to, from, and within a subdivision; street coordination withadjoining properties; clarification of the number of dwellings per tenth of a mile on privateroads; and requirement for a sketch plan of an entire tract of land when only a small portionis being proposed for a subdivision• Requirement for approval of the final plat by the Planning Director, which should reduce theamount of items being reviewed by the planning board and the time for a property owner torecord a final plat• Revised the Design Manual relative to the proposed ordinanceMr Roesler explained the staff has held several meetings with stakeholders to discuss the designmanual The only issue that seems to still cause concern is private roads The manual calls for paving ofprivate roads based on the following concerns condition and lack of proper maintenance, lack of policingresponsibility; the fact that school systems do not schedule them for bus routes, and some feeling thatlending institutions are questioning the financing for dwellings on private roadsCommissioner Thomas M Moore stated that after much thought, he now feels the ordinance shouldallow private roads providing there is a maintenance agreement, the stormwater management ordinanceis followed, and right -of -way is set aside so that everything will be in place in case future property ownerswish to make them public He also noted that he would like to see signs on these roads denoting that theyare privateMr Roesler commented the proposed ordinance would require 50 right -of -ways, and the designmanual provides for proper signs indicating that a road is privateCommissioner James H Langdon, Jr stated the problem is trying to provide quality and at the sametime not restrict developers The main concern is that private roads are clearly identified and that peopleknow what that means, including the fact that schools do not schedule them for bus routesCommissioner Cookie Pope stated she favored a new subdivision ordinance, but does not want itto be prohibitive to the point where the developers, surveyors, and general public are not allowed to dowhat they desireMr Genereux responded the proposed ordinance is a response to what the public has asked for inthe past There have been many complaints about private roads, especially concerning the lack ofmaintenance The goal was to address these concerns He noted that in some cases, the developer hasmoved away from the area, and when the property owners want the road paved, the expense is prohibitiveand they feel the County should be able to do something The proposed ordinance would not do away withprivate roads, just require paving and restrict density Mr Roesler commented the reference to density isreally an effort to better define what was a poorly written requirement in the existing ordinanceBoard members complimented the planning staff and stated they recognize the hard work that hasgone into this proposed ordinance, but feel it still needs some refiningThe Chairman opened the meeting for comments from the audienceDeveloper Curtis Hines stated that if the County requires paving of private roads, the cost wouldbe passed along to the homeowners This additional expense would keep some low income families frombeing able to purchase a homeSteven Sanderson stated he has several questions about the proposed ordinance other than theprivate roads He voiced concern that revisions have been made to the document since the public meetingswere held, and the developers have not been able to address these additions Concerning the stipulationthat private roads must be paved, he commented the ordinance requires more asphalt than the StateDepartment of Transportation This would only add to the expense to the property owners He stressedthe developers and surveyors need to have more input•Surveyor Dennis Blackman asked that no density restrictions be placed on private roads, especiallyif paving is requiredWayne Cross informed the Board he is building an apartment complex, and even though he will bethe single owner of rental property, he is required to follow the subdivision ordinance because of the waterand sewer There has been confusion about the road requirements and he has had to submit his plansseveral times to the planning staff and planning board He voiced frustration that now the planning staffis telling him he must leave a 50 easement to the adjacent property for a future cut - throughMr Roesler explained the County has tried to be helpful, however the staff is working at acrossroads between the existing ordinances which do not adequately address multi - family dwellingsCommissioner Eleanor N Creech pointed out the staff can only enforce the ordinances that are inplace They have no authority to change them on their own, and unfortunately sometimes this interfereswith efforts to help the citizensChairman Norman C Denning stated he would be appointing a committee in the near future to studythe proposed ordinance and make recommendations to the BoardLonny Peacock voiced opposition to the proposed requirement for stub -outs without compensation,and noted they should only be required when a property is landlocked He asked the Chairman to appointsurveyors to the study committeeJoe Donahue recommended the Commissioners hold a well- advertised workshop with the planningboard, planning staff, engineers, surveyors, developers, and the general public6 Princeton Kenly and Archer Lodge Water Districts - Adoption of Bond Order Notice ofReferendumUpon a motion by Commissioner James W Cash, seconded by Commissioner James H Langdon,Jr and carried by unanimous vote, the Board recessed regular session to sit simultaneously as thePrincetonKenly and Archer Lodge Water DistrictsA Acting as the Princeton Kenly Water District BoardAfter consideration of a public hearing held pursuant to NC General Statutes § 159 -57 onMay 4, 1998, and extensive comments and suggestions from members of the public, CommissionerThomas M Moore moved the passage and adoption of the Bond Order entitled BOND ORDERAUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THEPRINCETON KENLY WATER DISTRICT IN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPALAMOUNT OF 4,300,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, IN PART, THE ACQUISITION,CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A WATER SYSTEM IN THE DISTRICT in the formintroduced on April 6, 1998, and Commissioner Cookie Pope seconded the motion and the Bond Orderwas passed and adopted by the following voteAyes Norman C Denning, James W Cash, Jerry F Wood, Cookie Pope, Thomas M Moore,Eleanor N Creech, and James H Langdon, JrNays NoneNot Voting NoneCommissioner Thomas M Moore then introduced a resolution, the title of which is as follows andwas readRESOLUTION CALLING FOR REFERENDUM ON 4,300,000GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, PROVIDING FORNOTICE OFSUCH REFERENDUM, FORM OF BALLOT AND PUBLICATIONOF BOND ORDER AS ADOPTEDWHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of Johnston County, acting as the governing body of thePrincetonKenly Water District, has adopted a Bond Order entitled BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THE•ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE PRINCETON KENLY WATERDISTRICT IN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF 4,300,000 FOR THEPURPOSE OF FINANCING, IN PART, THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPINGOF A WATER SYSTEM IN THE DISTRICT andWHEREAS, NCGS § 159 -58 provides for publication of the Bond Order as adopted andN CGS § 159 -61 requires this Board to fix the date of the referendum on the Bond Order, notify the Boardof Elections thereof and provide for notice of the referendum to be published;NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Commissioners of Johnston County, acting as the governingbody of the PrincetonKenly Water District, meeting in regular session on June 8, 1998, do the followingBE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR JOHNSTON COUNTY,ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE PRINCETON KENLY WATER DISTRICT1 The Clerk to the Board shall cause the Bond Order, with a statement appended in the formdescribed by NCGS § 159 -58, to be published in The Smithfield Herald2 This Board hereby calls for a referendum with respect to the Bond Order and fixes the datethereof as August 4, 19983 The form of the question on the ballots shall be as followsShall the order authorizing 4,300,000 in maximum aggregate principalamount of general obligation bonds ofthe PrincetonKenly Water Districtfor financing, in part, the acquisition, construction and equipping of awater system in the District be approved[ ] YES [ ] NO4 The Clerk to the Board shall mail or deliver a copy of this resolution to the JohnstonCounty Board of Elections prior to June 11, 19985 The Clerk to the Board shall provide for publication of notice ofthe referendum as requiredby NCGS § 159 -61c in The Smithfield Herald6 The Board hereby declares that regular meetings of the Board of Commissioners of theDistrict shall take place at the same time and on the same dates as the regularly scheduled meetings of theBoard of Commissioners of Johnston County7 This resolution shall take effect immediatelyCommissioner Thomas M Moore moved the passage of such resolution and Commissioner CookiePope seconded the motion, and the resolution was passed by the following voteAyes Norman C Denning, James W Cash, Jerry F Wood, Cookie Pope, Thomas M Moore,Eleanor N Creech, and James H Langdon, JrNays NoneNot Voting NoneB Acting as the Archer Lodge Water District BoardAfter consideration of a public hearing held pursuant to NC General Statutes § 159 -57 on May4, 1998, and extensive comments and suggestions from members of the public, Commissioner Jerry FWood moved the passage and adoption ofthe Bond Order entitled BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THEISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE ARCHERS LODGE WATER DISTRICTIN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF 4,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OFFINANCING, IN PART, THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A WATERSYSTEM IN THE DISTRICT in the form introduced on April 6, 1998, and Commissioner Eleanor NCreech seconded the motion and the Bond Order was passed and adopted by the following voteAyes Norman C Denning, James W Cash, Jerry F Wood, Eleanor N Creech, Thomas MMoore, Cookie Pope, James H Langdon, JrNays NoneNot Voting Noneread•Commissioner Jerry F Wood then introduced a resolution, the title of which is as follows and wasRESOLUTION CALLING FOR REFERENDUM ON 4,000,000GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OFSUCH REFERENDUM, FORM OF BALLOT AND PUBLICATIONOF BOND ORDER AS ADOPTEDWHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of Johnston County, acting as the governing body of theArchers Lodge Water District, has adopted a Bond Order entitled BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THEISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE ARCHERS LODGE WATER DISTRICTIN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF 4,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OFFINANCING, IN PART, THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A WATERSYSTEM IN THE DISTRICT andWHEREAS, NCG S § 159 -58 provides for publication of the Bond Order as adopted andN CGS § 159 -61 requires this Board to fix the date of the referendum on the Bond Order, notify the Boardof Elections thereof and provide for notice of the referendum to be published;NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Commissioners of Johnston County, acting as the governingbody of the Archers Lodge Water District, meeting in regular session on June 8, 1998, do the followingBE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR JOHNSTON COUNTY,ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE ARCHERS LODGE WATER DISTRICT1 The Clerk to the Board shall cause the Bond Order, with a statement appended in the formdescribed by NCGS § 159 -58, to be published in The Smithfield Herald2 This Board hereby calls for a referendum with respect to the Bond Order and fixes the datethereof as August 4, 1998The form of the question on the ballots shall be as followsShall the order authorizing 4,000,000 in maximum aggregate principalamount of general obligation bonds of the Archers Lodge Water Districtfor financing, in part, the acquisition, construction and equipping of awater system in the District be approved[ ] YES [ ] NO4 The Clerk to the Board shall mail or deliver a copy of this resolution to the JohnstonCounty Board of Elections prior to June 11, 19985 The Clerk to the Board shall provide for publication of notice ofthe referendum as requiredby NCGS § 159 -61c in The Smithfield Herald6 The Board hereby declares that regular meetings of the Board of Commissioners of theDistrict shall take place at the same time and on the same dates as the regularly scheduled meetings of theBoard of Commissioners of Johnston County7 This resolution shall take effect immediatelyCommissioner Jerry F Wood moved the passage of such resolution and Commissioner Eleanor NCreech seconded the motion, and the resolution was passed by the following voteAyes Norman C Denning, James W Cash, Jerry F Wood, Eleanor N Creech, Cookie Pope,Thomas M Moore and James H Langdon, JrNays NoneNot Voting NoneUpon a motion by Commissioner Cookie Pope, seconded by Commissioner Eleanor N Creech andcarried by unanimous vote, the Board adjourned the PrincetonKenly Water District Board and the ArcherLodge Water District Board and resumed regular session7 Award of Bids - Furniture for Judicial AnnexThe Board reviewed the following bids received on June 5, 1998 for wood and laminate casegoodsfor the new Judicial AnnexDBM Office Products, Dunn, N C•Wood casegoods21,30130Laminate casegoods113,11370TOTAL BID134,37945Executive Furniture Industries, Huntingburg, IndianaWood casegoods 21,61825Laminate Casegoods 113,11370TOTAL BID 134,73195County Manager Richard B Self explained that DBM did not meet the specifications on all itemsin their bid For this reason, he recommended award of contract to Executive Furniture IndustriesUpon a motion by Commissioner Jerry F Wood, seconded by Commissioner James H Langdon,Jr and carried by unanimous vote, the Board awarded contract for wood and laminate casegoods for thenew Judicial Annex to Executive Furniture Industries in the amount of 134,731958 Bio- Solids TestEngineer Tim Broome informed the Board that several persons traveled to Granville County to seethe application of bio- solids, however, because of weather conditions, the process was delayed Hesuggested the Town of Benson be allowed to conduct a one time test application on a five -acre parcel andinvite the public to observe By having this done in the County, those persons interested would be able tovisit the site more than onceCommissioner Thomas M Moore moved the Board authorize the Town of Benson to apply bio-solids to a five -acre parcel near Benson as a one time test, to be observed by all interested citizensCommissioner Jerry F Wood seconded the motionIn discussion, Commissioner James H Langdon, Jr voiced concern that the public might notunderstand this actionAfter further discussion, Commissioner Jerry F Wood agreed it would be better to table this matterat this time and withdrew his motion Commissioner Thomas M Moore withdrew his secondThere being no further business, Commissioner Jerry F Wood moved the Board adjournCommissioner Eleanor N Creech seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voteNorman C Denning, ChairmanJoyce K Ennis, ClerkDetailsAnnotationsEntry PropertiesModified11192013 21510 PMCreated3242003 11823 PMTemplateMinutesFieldsMinutes - TypeZoningMinutes - Date681998Book21