July 10, 2006 - 1:00 PM - County Board of Commissioners Meeting Minutes

10 537 Meeting of the Johnston County Board of Commissioners July 10 , 2006 1 00 pm The Johnston County Board of Commissioners met in regular session Monday , July 10 , 2006 at 1 00 pm in the Commissioners Meeting Room , Johnston County Courthouse Annex , Smithfield , North Carolina The following members were present Present Cookie Pope , Chairman , Wade M Stewart , Vice Chairman , Allen L Mims , Jr , Jeffrey P Carver , W Ray Woodall , DeVan Barbour and Tony Braswell Commissioner Braswell was excused from the meeting early Absent None Also Present Rick J Hester , County Manager , April N Byrd , Clerk to the Board , John R Massey , Finance Officer , J Mark Payne , County Attorney , and Deva Holt , Deputy Clerk The Chairman called the meeting to order and the following business was transacted 1 Minutes Approved Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr moved the Board approve the minutes for the June 5 , 2006 1 00 pm and 6 00 pm , and June 19 , 2006 6 00 pm board meetings with a change in the wording of the last sentence of th th the 5 paragraph under Item 2 – Johnston County Board of Education of the June 19 minutes He suggested changing “ … locally paid teachers should be paid the same rate as county employees ” to “ … locally paid teachers should be paid the same raise as all our county employees , or they should be on the state payroll ” Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous vote 2 Public Comments Recognition of North Johnston Valedictorian Commissioner Tony Braswell introduced Andrew White , 2006 North Johnston Valedictorian , and commended his many accomplishments and future ambitions 3 Report to Board - Fireworks Displays Approved by Chairman th Chairman Cookie Pope informed the Board that since the June 5 meeting she had approved the following fireworks displays th th Celebrate Cleveland - July 4 Clayton Parks & Recreation - July 4 th th Triple “ S ” Ranch - July 4 Town of Kenly - July 4 th Camp Tuscarora - July 7 4 Request for Special Referendum – Cleveland Township Don Wells , 223 George Wilton Drive , Clayton , resident of the Cleveland Township , appeared before the Board and requested approval of a malt beverage township election , as provided by NC General Statute Section 18b - 600 Mr Wells reminded the Board that Johnston County held two countywide malt beverage elections during the past 10 years 1997 and 2002 , however , both elections were defeated by small margins He pointed out the results in the Cleveland Township in 1997 - total of 955 votes cast , 727 in favor of malt beverage issue and 228 against ; in 2002 - total of 1,331 votes cast , 884 in favor , 447 against Mr Wells stated , as a result of those elections , it is his opinion that the people in the Cleveland Township are overwhelmingly in favor of malt beverage sales He presented to the Board several documents , including a map illustrating the Cleveland Township , which consist of the North Cleveland and South Cleveland voting precincts The township is bounded on the west by Wake County , the east by Dickinson Road , the north by Swift Creek , and the south by Little Creek Mr Wells stated that over the past several years , Cleveland residents have heard rumors that grocery store chains were coming to the area , but this never came true In his opinion , one of the reasons the stores never came is because they would not be able to sell beer He noted that in 1997 , the “ liquor by the drink ” issue passed countywide , allowing establishments that qualify as restaurants to sell beer In the Cleveland area , three convenience stores can sell beer , however , the grocery store cannot because it does not qualify as a restaurant Approval of the malt beverage issue would allow grocery stores to be on the same footing as the convenience stores Page538 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Mr Wells informed the Board that NC General Statute Section 18b - 600 states that these types of elections cannot be held during the general election in November of an even numbered year Therefore , he requested a special election to consider the malt beverage issue in the Cleveland Township NC General Statute also states upon the Commissioners ’ approval , the election must be held no earlier than 60 days or no later than th th 120 days Mr Wells noted 60 days from July 10 would be September 8 , and 120 days would be November th 7 , the day of the general election He requested the election take place on a Tuesday in late September in order to avoid voter confusion with the general election in November Mr Wells commented the residents of the Cleveland Township would not want to cause a burden on the rest of the county for something that they wished to do He stated that two individuals have agreed to reimburse the County for the cost of the special election Mr Wells presented for the Board’s consideration a proposed resolution that included all of the above points , and requirements of NC General Statute Section 18b - 600 He offered to answer any questions , and pointed out the attendance of other Cleveland residents at the meeting County Attorney Mark Payne noted that he had met with Mr Wells , and reviewed the legal standards for the township election He stated that it appears the Township and the County meet those standards Further , he commented that the resolution is legally satisfactory , if that is the direction the board wants to go in Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr stated that as he remembers , the commissioners can call for a referendum anytime they want , unless General Statute specifically states otherwise Also , a person can get a petition of a certain percentage of the voters , and force a special referendum regardless of the commissioners ’ actions He asked whether Mr Wells had started a petition Mr Wells responded that Section 18b - 600 subsection f 2 states “ The election shall be held by the county board of elections upon request of the county board of commissioners or upon petition of twenty - five 25 percent of the registered voters of the township ” He noted that no one had started a petition , and commented that it would take a while to do this , considering the number of voters in the Cleveland Township Commissioner Wade M Stewart pointed out that another way to accommodate the malt beverage issue in the Cleveland Township is for the area to become an incorporated municipality Mr Wells agreed that incorporation may solve the issue , and if there was an incorporated town in that area , then it would be up to the town council to approve the election He noted that a town may not cover the entire township area , and the tax base would need to be such that it could support the expenses necessary to provide adequate services In his opinion , the township vote would allow more development in the area , and a different kind of development , such as large grocery chains , that could build the tax base , making it easier to incorporate at a later date Mr Wells stated that incorporation could not be done within the next 60 - 120 days The special election would provide the voters in the township something that they clearly want , and hopefully , push toward incorporation Commissioner Stewart commented that it may not be out of the ordinary for special township elections to occur , however , in his opinion , it appears to be a piece - meal approach He stated that he is accustomed to doing things countywide , and had no objection to another countywide referendum Commissioner Stewart asked if there was a grocery store in an adjacent township that may not fall within the request , and could be hurt by the special election in Cleveland Mr Wells recognized that approval of the special election in Cleveland may create a zone where the malt beverage laws are different than the rest of the county , but pointed out that any township in the county could do the same In response to Commissioner Stewart’s question , he stated that there is a Food Lion in the McGee’s Crossroads area , which is not in the Cleveland Township Commissioner Stewart asked Elections Director Teresa Davis if she would be able to calculate the entire cost of the special election so that taxpayers are not responsible for part of the bill Elections Director Teresa Davis estimated the total cost of the special election at 10,000 - 15,000 She noted each precinct would have two machines , with the programming expense being 2200 per machine , and also mentioned the expenses associated with early voting , absentee ballots , and precinct officials Ms Davis had spoken with Don White , State Attorney for the Board of Elections , and he confirmed the request falls into the category of a township election She stated that , if the Board approved the special election request , it would be best for the Elections Office if the Board scheduled the election as early as possible Page539 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Commissioner Mims asked if the Board wanted to require some type of financial guarantee ahead of time Mr Wells noted the proposed resolution dictates that the costs would be covered Commissioner Stewart asked Mr Payne whether Cleveland Township residents would be absent from voting on countywide referenda of this nature in the future , if the request is approved and the Cleveland Township voters approve the special election Mr Payne responded that the Cleveland Township residents would still vote , however , the result of the countywide referendum would not affect their situation Commissioner Stewart stated , in his opinion , the people who already have what they want are not going to show up at the polls to vote for a countywide referendum , but those that are continually opposed in every election would show up to vote He expressed concern that all future referenda would be done on a piecemeal basis in Johnston County Mr Wells responded that a provision of the statute states the sale of food plus nonalcoholic beverages would be required to exceed the sale of alcoholic beverages for any establishment that qualifies for a permit because of a township election This restriction is not on the countywide vote He pointed out that it would be important for Cleveland residents to turn out for a countywide vote , in order to lift the restriction Commissioner Tony Braswell requested the Chairman give the Board time to review the documents presented by Mr Wells Chairman Pope postponed further discussion on the item until the 6 00 pm meeting 5 Joint Public Hearing - Johnston County & Town of Smithfield – 1 05 pm – Economic Development Incentive Package Public hearing was delayed due to lengthy discussion on Item 4 County Advertisement June 27 , 2006 The Smithfield Herald The Chairman opened the public hearing , and stated the purpose of the hearing is to allow for comments on a proposal for the County to provide certain economic incentives , pursuant to NCGS 158 - 71 , to a company that is planning building modifications and equipment additions in Johnston County She noted this is a joint hearing between the County and the Town of Smithfield , and asked Mayor Norman Johnson to call the Town’s meeting to order and open their public hearing Mayor Johnson called the Town’s meeting to order and opened their respective public hearing Economic Development Director Michael de Sherbinin stated the company is the Andrew Corporation , and introduced representatives Lonnie Lempert and Brian Sawyer Mr de Sherbinin stated the purpose of the hearing is to review a proposed Economic Development Incentive Grant on behalf of the Town of Smithfield and the County of Johnston for the Andrew Corporation On June 22 , 2006 , the Andrew Corporation announced that they would be staying in Smithfield in the 235,000 sq ft former Channel Master facility Contingent upon consideration of an incentive grant , the Andrew Corporation agreed to expand their operation over the next five consecutive years , beginning in calendar year 2007 The expansion would include a projected new investment of 10,154,300 , and allow approximately 200 additional jobs As a result , the County’s Economic Development Office proposes an Economic Development Incentive Grant , given the Andrew Corporation makes payment of its taxes on an annual basis , and submits copies of invoices and cancelled checks to the Johnston County Economic Development Office , which would review the invoices according to the approved reimbursement list The Economic Development Office would submit to the County Finance Office the eligible items for reimbursement The Town and the County would deposit the ad valorem tax receipts , review eligible expenditures under the grant provision , and give to the Andrew Corporation on an annual basis , after their taxes have been paid , a grant based on the percentage of the total taxes that they have paid Over a five year period of time , the County would grant back to Andrews Corporation 263,446 , and the Town would grant back 192,518 , for a total of 455,965 Mr de Sherbinin noted that the proposed Economic Development Incentive Grant represents less than 10 of Wayne County’s offer state and local funds for the company to relocate there He recommended that the Board of Commissioners and Town Council consider the proposed grant In response to a question from Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver , Mr de Sherbinin stated the 263,446 was based upon the 10,154,300 new investment , and had no correlation to existing tax base He noted the proposed grant agreement , as reviewed by the Town and County Attorney , stipulates the basis on which to proceed The personal property listed as of January 2006 was approximately 17 million , and an estimate prepared by County Tax Administrator Pat Goddard for the real property , representing the 235,000 sq ft Page540 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued subdivision of the former Channel Master building , has a value of approximately 27 million As the company brings in additional equipment and modifies the building , those further investments would go toward the grant as well Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr asked if most of the investment would be in equipment Brian Sawyer , Andrew representative , responded that 38 million is planned for building modification and refurbishment , and the remainder of the investment for capital equipment and tooling that would be utilized in the facility In response to a question from Commissioner Mims regarding the depreciation of equipment , Mr de Sherbinin stated that based on the five year grant the residual value of the equipment would generally be 20 Tax Administrator Pat Goddard noted the equipment is rather specialized , and would trend down a little slower than general manufacturing equipment , possibly a 25 - 35 residual on a 20 year life Mr de Sherbinin presented the following proposed incentive package for the record Johnston County , North Carolina Economic Development Incentive Grant The Johnston County Economic Development Incentive Grant the Grant , is offered by the Board of County Commissioners as a means to facilitate the location and or expansion of significant new investment and job creation opportunities for the County of Johnston To that end , the Board of Commissioners can agree upon a grant offer that binds both the County and the company to certain performance standards which can include the creation and or retention of jobs , capital investment thresholds incurred by a company , and payment of ad valorem taxes by a company , all within a time certain as necessary to induce this economic opportunity The County of Johnston can reimburse a company on an annual basis certain project components that include , but are not limited to the following Site acquisition , Personal property , Architectural and engineering design costs , Project related legal fees , Permit costs , Site grading expenses , Utility extension and upgrade expenses , Fire protection , Capacity and or acreage fees , Installation of building pad costs , Costs for equipment and installation thereof , Cost for transportation and rigging of equipment , Worker training expenses , Sales tax , Costs for pretreatment , Demolition , Building modifications , Parking lot development , and Costs incurred for environmental compliance matters Prior to the authorization of the Grant , the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing whereby the scope of the Grant and its relationship to the total project will be previewed for public comment Upon an affirmative vote to offer said Grant by the Board of County Commissioners , the company will be notified of the dollar amount and term for the Grant program The company on an annual basis will be required to submit copies of invoices and canceled checks to the Johnston County Economic Development Office who will review and approve for payment to the Johnston County Finance Office Upon agreement by the Finance Office for payment , reimbursement to the company shall occur from the Johnston County General Fund This process will continue on an annual basis until such time as the Grant agreement expires Smithfield Town Council member Vic Ogburn asked whether there are specific employee numbers tied to the proposed grant He also inquired about the current number of employees , and the projected number within five years PagePage pageNumber5541 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Mr de Sherbinin stated that the company in their previous application to the Department of Commerce provided employment tables that coincide with the five year period of time He noted that the proposed agreement does not require Andrew to hit any employment thresholds The corporation currently employs 232 people , and anticipates adding 204 jobs within the next five years In response to a question from Smithfield Town Council member Tom Bell , Mr de Sherbinin clarified the total grant from the Town would be 192,518 There being no further comments , Chairman Pope closed the public hearing for the County Mayor Johnson closed the public hearing for the Town 6 Boards Approve Incentive Grant Agreements for the Andrew Corporation Upon a motion by Commissioner DeVan Barbour , seconded by Commissioner W Ray Woodall and carried by unanimous vote , the Board approved the Economic Development Incentive Grant Agreement between the County and the Andrew Corporation as proposed Further , the Smithfield Town Council approved their respective Economic Development Incentive Grant Agreement between the Town and the Andrew Corporation as proposed 7 Resolution for Turn Lane – Andrew Corporation Economic Development Director Michael de Sherbinin informed the Board that Andrew needs a turn - lane for their south entrance , estimated cost of 150,000 Mr de Sherbinin stated that he recently met with Durwood Stephenson and Tim Little , NC DOT , Brian Sawyer , Andrew Corporation , and Paula Woodard , County Economic Development Office to discuss the matter Mr Stephenson has submitted a 130,000 request for consideration by the DOT for the construction of the turn - lane Also , the new landlord of the property , IRG , has agreed to provide 20,000 toward the cost of the turn - lane Mr de Sherbinin asked the Board to adopt a resolution requesting the NC DOT to construct the turn - lane to serve the Andrew Corporation In response to a question from Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr , Mr de Sherbinin noted the 130,000 th request would be an agenda item at DOT’s meeting the week of July 10 Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver asked whether an allocation from DOT for the turn - lane would have an impact on the County’s secondary road program Mr de Sherbinin responded the project would not have an impact on the County’s secondary road program In response to a question from Commissioner Wade M Stewart , Mr de Sherbinin confirmed the request for the turn - lane is a separate item , and if DOT does not approve the request , it would not have an impact on Andrew’s planned expansion Upon a motion by Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr , seconded by Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver and carried by unanimous vote , the Board approved the following resolution requesting DOT construct a turn - lane to serve the Andrew Corporation RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO CONSTRUCT A TURN - LANE TO SERVE ANDREW CORPORATION ON INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE IN THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS , the Johnston County Board of Commissioners seek to create and foster economic development opportunities for the County ; and WHEREAS , new job creation and increased capital investment add to the economic health of the County ; and WHEREAS , Andrew Corporation has announced that they will expand their operations within 235,000 sf located inside the former 750,000 sf Channel Master building located in Smithfield , North Carolina on Industrial Park Drive ; and WHEREAS , Andrew Corporation will cause to occur 10,154,300 of additional capital taxable investment and create an additional 204 new jobs , ultimately employing 436 people within a five year period of time ; and WHEREAS , Andrew Corporation as a condition of their location decision , requires the construction and paving of a turn lane off of Industrial Park Drive at the southern entrance of the building , with funding being provided by IRG the building owner at 20,000 and the remaining funds provided by the North Carolina Department of Transportation contingent upon the Department of Transportation’s ability to secure such funding for the project PagePage pageNumber6542 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED that the Johnston County Board of Commissioners requests the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s consideration to construct , pave , and maintain the turn lane to facilitate the location of this project 8 Board of Education – Request for Budget Amendment Fred Bartholomew , Chairman of the Board of Education , requested the Board approve budget amendments for the following purposes 1 to shift 42 million in 2005 bond funds to cover bids that were approved but in excess of the bond referendum estimates , and 2 to move 3 million in Average Daily Membership funds from the State He noted that rising construction costs have made this amendment necessary Mr Bartholomew thanked the Board for their time , and introduced fellow School Board members Kay Carroll , Jack O’Hale and Larry Strickland , Superintendent Dr Tony Parker , Assistant Superintendent Ann Williams and Finance Director Dan Jones Commissioner Wade M Stewart asked Ms Williams to explain the project overruns Ms Williams responded that both Dixon Road and West View are model schools The difference in the project costs is the Dixon Road design allows 12 classrooms to be added at a later date ; the additional classrooms are already included in the initial build at West View In regards to the Dixon Road School , there was a problem grading the land , even though Johnston County Schools JCS hired their own geo - tech person and grading contractor with 30 years experience She noted this was the reason JCS did not have a total cost figure until the end of the project Ms Williams estimated the additional grading work at approximately 400,000 Secondly , the sewer costs at the Dixon Road site turned out to be more than JCS expected Finally , she stated JCS has always bought equipment out of their budget , and in the past , has moved 800,000 for equipment at McGee’s Middle School Ms Williams noted JCS thought they would be able to carry funds over from the smaller project at Dixon Road to the larger project at West View , but unfortunately the funds have been depleted In regards to the West View School , she stated the individual contracts are higher but the design includes the additional 12 classrooms Also , JCS is responsible for traffic improvement costs , ie turn lane , stoplight Ms Williams noted the Board of Education has historically always added money to make projects work Further , she commented on the projects that will be funded by the second bond sale “ Wave 2 ” projects , and stated JCS has pulled a little of that money for architectural fees JCS worked with the same architectural firms they have used for years to design the Wave 2 projects , and tried to design them the exact same as in the past The bids for Northwest Middle School came in over 2 million higher than the last time the model was used Ms Williams pointed out this was the sixth time the model had been used , and the higher bids were a result of increased construction costs , ie gasoline , concrete , steel She reminded the Board that JCS took into consideration increasing construction costs , and raised their 2002 and 2003 school construction estimates by 10 for the 2004 bond list Ms Williams stated JCS looked at monies that were available , and noted that for the last two years JCS saved the ADM construction money , approximately 12 - 15 million per year They also checked to see if funds were left in other completed projects This resulted in the ability to move money around , and cover the costs of finishing the two elementary schools Dixon and West View , and go ahead with the Wave 2 projects Ms Williams stated JCS had three options 1 Redesign the projects that have come in over - bid , and chance over - bids a second time , 2 request additional funds from the Commissioners , or 3 eliminate the projects Mr Bartholomew added that the Board of Education was told by people who bid on the projects that construction cost would be going up again in 15 days Ms Williams pointed out that copper wiring went up 30 in 13 days Commissioner Stewart stated as he understood it there was a 15 million overrun on the Dixon Road School , and a 18 million overrun on the West View School He asked Ms Williams to explain the specific costs that make up each total overrun Commissioner Stewart also inquired about the projects designated for the second sale of the bonds Wave 2 projects , and whether the 375 million would cover the projects ’ costs Ms Williams responded that the list presented only included the projects with overruns ; other projects are on target She noted that in order to use the money JCS currently has , particular contracts had not been awarded , such as kitchen equipment at some of the schools In response to Commissioner Stewart’s question regarding the Wave 2 projects , Ms Williams stated the 375 million would not cover the projects ’ costs PagePage pageNumber7543 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Commissioner Stewart stated he understood that an originally budgeted 135 million school is now 16 million , with the costs still going up , however , he expressed concern that contractors were not being held to the approved bid amounts Ms Williams responded contractors were honoring the awarded contracts , and any change orders were a result of architectural changes once the projects began She stated that JCS has worked hard to make sure the projects received the lowest bids Dr Parker added costs are increasing faster than anyone anticipated JCS checked with eight different school systems heavily involved in school construction , and their costs are up 40 - 60 Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr asked if JCS still uses project ordinances He expressed concern that the request for additional funds is coming at the end of the projects , and suggested using project ordinances to make everyone aware of shortcomings before the schools are finished Commissioner Mims noted in 2002 , project ordinances were established , which sent up a flag every time something was over Further , he recalled that the school model was supposed to save on grading costs , and that thousands of yards of dirt could be saved by leaving one building lower than the rest Commissioner Mims asked if this had been applicable to recently constructed schools Ms Williams replied JCS uses project ordinances , however , the requested items are ones that the Board of Education usually handles without bringing to the Commissioners Further , she explained that the model school layout is not because of the grading , but rather the shape of the land She stated that all of the recent school sites are flat , with the exception of Dixon Road , and noted it was almost futile at this site For the first time , the connectors corridors between buildings are ramped , which is not so with the other schools Mr Bartholomew noted 300 million has been spent on schools over the past 15 years , and pointed out the Commissioners approved all of the funding He stated the budget request was not uncommon , and the Board of Education has presented similar requests in the past Mr Bartholomew thanked the Board for their questions In response to further questions from Commissioner Stewart regarding the overruns , Ms Williams added the following 1 West View project cost between 700,000 - 800,000 more because it is a bigger school , 2 West View stoplight cost 100,000 , 3 additional expenses for other issues with DOT concerning grading at West View She reiterated , as far as contractors and approved bids , there were no cost overruns Commissioner Stewart suggested in the future JCS give the Commissioners information on the approved bids and the final expenses for the projects Commissioner Cookie Pope instructed the Board to take the request under advisement , and possibly discuss further at the 6 00 pm board meeting 9 Introduction of Bond Order and Call for Public Hearing - O’Neals Water District Upon a motion by Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr , seconded by Commissioner Tony Braswell and carried by unanimous vote , the Board recessed regular session to sit as the O’Neals Water District Board Chairman Cookie Pope introduced the following Bond Order , the title of which was read BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE O’NEALS WATER DISTRICT IN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF 11,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING , IN PART , THE ACQUISITION , CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A WATER SYSTEM IN THE DISTRICT WHEREAS , The Board of Commissioners of Johnston County the “ Board ” acting as the governing body of the O’Neals Water District the “ District ” has decided to pursue the issuance of general obligation bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of 11,000,000 under the Local Government Bond Act the “ Act ” to finance , in part , the acquisition , construction and equipping of a water system in the District ; and WHEREAS , The Board has filed an application with the Local Government Commission of North Carolina for approval of such bonds as required by the Act ; BE IT ORDERED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF JOHNSTON COUNTY ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE O’NEALS WATER DISTRICT PagePage pageNumber8544 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued 1 It is hereby determined necessary and expedient for the District to borrow money , and there is hereby authorized to be issued general obligation bonds of the District for the purpose of providing money to finance , in part , the acquisition , construction and equipping of a water system in the District 2 The bonds shall be in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed a maximum of 11,000,000 3 The bonds shall be general obligations of the District for the payment of principal of and interest on which its full faith and credit shall be irrevocably pledged and taxes will be levied in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds 4 A sworn statement of debt has been filed with the Clerk to the Board pursuant to GS § 159 - 55 and is open to public inspection 5 This Bond Order will take effect when approved by the voters of the District pursuant to GS § 159 - 61 Chairman Cookie Pope then introduced the following resolution the title of which was read RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON BOND ORDER FOR 11,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND PUBLICATION OF BOND ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING AND OTHER ACTION WHEREAS , There has been introduced to the Board of Commissioners of Johnston County acting as the governing body of the O’Neals Water District a Bond Order entitled , “ BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE O’NEALS WATER DISTRICT IN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF 11,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING , IN PART , THE ACQUISITION , CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A WATER SYSTEM IN THE DISTRICT ; ” and WHEREAS , GS § 159 - 54 provides there shall be a public hearing on the Bond Order and GS § 159 - 56 provides for publication of the Bond Order and notice of hearing ; NOW , THEREFORE , the Board of Commissioners of Johnston County , meeting in regular session at Smithfield , North Carolina , on July 10 , 2006 , do the following BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF JOHNSTON COUNTY ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE O’NEALS WATER DISTRICT 1 A public hearing on the Bond Order shall be held at 1 15 pm in the Commissioners ’ Meeting Room in the Johnston County Courthouse Annex , Smithfield , North Carolina on August 14 , 2006 2 The Clerk to this Board of Commissioners shall cause the Bond Order , with a statement appended in form described by GS § 159 - 56 , to be published in The Smithfield Herald 3 The County Manager is hereby designated to file the statement of debt required by GS § 159 - 55 4 The completed form of application to the Local Government Commission with respect to the proposed bonds is hereby approved 5 This resolution shall take effect immediately Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr moved the passage of the foregoing resolution Commissioner W Ray Woodall seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous vote Upon a motion by Commissioner W Ray Woodall , seconded by Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver and carried by unanimous vote , the Board adjourned as the O’Neals Water District Board , and regular session was resumed 10 Department of Transportation – Additions to System The Board reviewed petitions presented by the North Carolina Department of Transportation requesting the following roads be added to the State Secondary System for maintenance Paris Villa Drive Formally Godwin Lane & Shepherd Drive - Kenneth Talton Subdivision - Selma Township Winfred Drive SR 2297 Ext , Fox Pen Drive , Cattle Farm Drive , Alfred Court , and Fox Crossing Drive - Waverly Point Subdivision - Phases IV & V - Cleveland Township Wahoo Drive and Sailfish Court - Harrison Ridge Subdivision - Clayton Township Commissioner W Ray Woodall moved the Board concur with the NC Department of Transportation’s request to add the above listed roads to the State Maintained System Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous vote 11 Public Hearing – 1 15 pm – NC DOT 2005 - 06 & 2006 - 07 Secondary Road Construction Programs Public hearing was delayed due to lengthy discussion on previous items Advertised June 30 , July 7 , 2006 – The Smithfield Herald Also advertised in the Clayton News Star , News in Review , Kenly News , Selma News , and Princeton News Leader PagePage pageNumber9545 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued The Chairman opened the public hearing , and stated the purpose of the hearing is for representatives of the North Carolina Department of Transportation to present the 2005 - 06 and 2006 - 07 Secondary Road Construction Programs , and to hear comments from the public on the matter Tim Little and Bobby Lewis , with the NC Department of Transportation , appeared before the Board to present the 2005 - 06 and 2006 - 07 Secondary Road Construction Programs Mr Little reviewed the following information with the Board 2005 - 2006 North Carolina Department of Transportation Proposed Secondary Road Program Johnston County Anticipated Funding HWY 1,058,83712 Anticipated Funding TRUST 1,004,47394 TOTAL ANTICIPATED 2,063,31106 Map Number Priority Description Length Anticipated Cost 1 Hold SR 1300 J Lee Road 07 150,00000 List From US 301 to SR 1301 2 Hold SR 2337 Fitzgerald Road 08 150,00000 List From SR 1001 to SR 2335 3 Sub SR 2384 Peele Farm Road 09 125,00000 List From SR 2339 to Dead End 4 Sub SR 1527 Taylor Road 05 100,00000 List From SR 1528 to Dead End 5 1F SR 2513 Woods Road 14 225,00000 From US 70 Business to SR 2512 6 2F SR 1737 Pine Tree Road 06 94,00000 From SR 1733 to SR 1736 7 N A SR 1300 J Lee Road N A 75,00000 From 029 miles west of US 301 8 N A SR 1301 McLamb - Tart Road N A 75,00000 From 044 miles west of US 301 9 N A Widen and Apply OGFC on SR 1003 32 225,00000 Buffalo Road From SR 1908 to Red Hill Church 10 N A Regrade intersection of SR 1532 N A 100,00000 White Memorial Road at NC 210 to provide adequate site distance 11 N A Widen and Resurface SR 1525 27 225,00000 Government Road From NC 42 to SR 1010 OTHER Description Anticipated Cost Contingency Fund Surveys , Right of 159,00000 Ways , Fire Dept Rescue Driveways and Overdrafts Maintenance fund allocation used to 310,000 supplement the maintenance budget for activities such as shoulder repair , spot stabilization , pipe replacement , safety projects , industrial access , etc School Bus Driveway 50,000 Reimbursement Summary of the 2005 - 2006 program Length Cost # Homes # Businesses Total Rural 490 844,00000 450 10Page0546 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Total Other 590 1,219,00000 N A Overall Total 108 2,063,00000 450 10 THIS PROGRAM IS SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING , RIGHT OF WAY , AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW If Right of Way is unavailable on any of the above roads or if additional funding becomes available , the program will be continued in priority order 2006 - 2007 North Carolina Department of Transportation Proposed Secondary Road Program Johnston County Anticipated Funding HWY - 1,495,97753 PAVED Anticipated Funding HWY - UNPAVED 243,40424 Anticipated Funding TRUST 812,32419 TOTAL ANTICIPATED 2,551,70596 Map Number Priority Description Length Anticipated Cost 1 Hold SR 2380 Myrtle Road 06 150,00000 List From SR 1927 to Dead End 2 3F SR 2334 Old Bagley Road 06 125,00000 From SR 2363 to SR 1001 3 4F SR 1206 Rose Dairy Road 06 125,00000 From SR 1009 to Dead End 4 5F SR 1746B Carroll Road 08 145,00000 From SR 1735 to SR 1720 5 6F SR 1742A Salem Church Road 06 125,00000 From SR 1716 to SR 1741 6 7F SR 2158 Old Stancil Road 12 243,40424 From NC 222 to SR 2148 7 N A Widen and Resurface SR 1005 Woods 37 345,00000 Xrds Road From NC 50 to County Line 8 N A Widen and Resurface SR 1543 Dixon 12 125,00000 Road From NC 50 to SR 1309 9 N A Realign SR 1533 at NC 50 and N A 300,00000 construct turn lanes on SR 1533 10 N A Widen and Resurface SR 2523 Bakers 41 325,00000 Chapel Road From SR 1007 to SR 2530 OTHER Description Anticipated Cost Contingency Fund Surveys , Right of 175,000 Ways , Fire Dept Rescue Driveways and Overdrafts Maintenance fund allocation used to 310,000 supplement the maintenance budget for activities such as shoulder repair , spot stabilization , pipe replacement , safety projects , industrial access , etc School Bus Driveway 50,000 Reimbursement - Benson Elem Summary of the 2006 - 2007program Length Cost # Homes # Businesses Total Rural 490 913,40424 220 10Page1547 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Total Other 590 1,630,00000 N A Overall Total 108 2,543,40424 220 10 THIS PROGRAM IS SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING , RIGHT OF WAY , AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW If Right of Way is unavailable on any of the above roads or if additional funding becomes available , the program will be continued in priority order Mr Little noted by NC General Statute school systems can apply for reimbursement of a portion of the costs for school bus driveways for new schools The maximum reimbursement is 50,000 He stated there is a back - log of approximately seven or eight requests at the current time In regards to earlier comments regarding the turn - lane for the Andrew Corporation , Mr Little stated the monies would come from economic development and industrial access funds , and are based on investment and the number of jobs being created In response to a question from Commissioner Cookie Pope regarding the turn - lane on Dixon Road , Mr Little noted the turn - lanes would be at the cost of the schools DOT will be widening and resurfacing the road to provide approximately one additional foot of pavement on each side to accommodate the traffic for the new school Commissioner Wade M Stewart asked how many miles of unpaved roads remain in the county , and about the status of Elizabeth Road in the Brogden community Mr Little responded there are approximately 20 miles of unpaved roads on the priority list , and an additional 10 miles of unpaved roads not on the list Elizabeth Road is currently number 16 on the priority list , and would probably be included in the 2008 - 09 program Commissioner Braswell commented that there will be some Transportation Improvement Program TIP projects also occurring in the county st st Mr Lewis added the Highway 39 bridge project should begin September 1 - November 1 , and the st Exit 95 bridge project October 1 The Neuse River bridge on Highway 70 Business project is tentatively scheduled for 2009 There being no further comments , the Chairman closed the public hearing Motion to Concur with the Secondary Road Programs for 2005 - 06 and 2006 - 07 Upon a motion by Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr , seconded by Commissioner DeVan Barbour and carried by unanimous vote , the Board adopted the following resolution NC Department of Transportation Secondary Road Construction Programs 2005 - 2006 and 2006 - 07 WHEREAS The Johnston County Board of Commissioners has received from the Department of Transportation the 2005 - 2006 and 2006 - 07 Secondary Road Construction Programs as presented by North Carolina Department of Transportation officials , said roads being a part of the system maintained by the Department of Transportation , Division of Highways ; and WHEREAS After careful consideration of the services rendered by said roads and the traffic demands of said County , it is deemed necessary that said roads be improved in order to better serve the interest of the people of Johnston County NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Johnston County Board of Commissioners hereby concurs with the requests of the North Carolina Department of Transportation to make the improvements on the roads listed on the Secondary Road Construction Programs for 2005 - 2006 and 2006 - 07 12 Public Hearing – 1 30 pm – Cleveland Fire Department Request for First Responder Franchise Public hearing was delayed due to lengthy discussion on previous items Advertised June 23 , 27 , 2006 – The Smithfield Herald The Chairman opened the public hearing , and stated the purpose of the hearing is to allow public comment on an application from the Cleveland Fire Department requesting a franchise amendment allowing the department to operate as a first responder unit in their district Page2548 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Emergency Services Director Dewayne West stated the request is a result of a recommendation from the Emergency Services Advisory Committee to franchise the Cleveland Fire Department as a first responder unit The department previously had a first responder franchise , however , had to cease the service when the number of volunteers dwindled Since that time , the department has trained new volunteers , and would like to re - establish the service to their community There being no further comments , the Chairman closed the public hearing Commissioner Wade M Stewart stated that first responder units are one of the best services that fire departments can provide , and moved the Board grant the franchise to the Cleveland Fire Department to operate as a first responder unit in their district Commissioner Tony Braswell seconded the motion , which carried by th unanimous vote The Board agreed to take a required second vote on the item at the July 10 6 00 pm meeting 13 Public Hearing – 1 35 pm – Boundary Adjustment - Territories of Clayton & 50 - 210 EMS Depts Public hearing was delayed due to lengthy discussion on previous items Advertised June 23 , 27 , 2006 – The Smithfield Herald The Chairman opened the public hearing , and stated the purpose of the hearing is to allow public comment on a recommendation from the EMS Advisory Committee for a boundary adjustment within the currently served territories of Clayton and 50 - 210 EMS Departments Emergency Services Director Dewayne West stated the request is a result of a recommendation from the Emergency Services Advisory Committee to adjust the boundaries of the Clayton and 50 - 210 EMS departments The adjustment would shift the boundary from Cleveland Road Highway 1010 to Swift Creek This would add approximately 450 calls to the 50 - 210 department , balance the call volume between the two departments , and allow for the growth that is anticipated in the Clayton area Mr West noted that within 24 months , Clayton’s call volume would probably return to what it is now even with the adjustment If the Board approves the boundary adjustment , 50 - 210 has agreed to place an EMS unit at the Cleveland Fire Department , which would make response much quicker Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr asked whether both departments were in agreement in regards to the boundary adjustment Mr West stated everyone was in agreement at the Emergency Services Advisory Committee meeting , however , representatives from the Clayton department are in attendance at the meeting today Chris Cangeni , Clayton EMS Chief , appeared before the Board , and read the following statement Since its establishment in 1963 , the men and women of Clayton Area Rescue have unselfishly given of themselves for the betterment of the community to include serving the Cleveland area The sacrifices of time and family each has given have made a significant difference in the lives that they have touched There dedication , heroics , and front line medial care have truly made a difference over the past 43 years Last year when called upon by the Commissioners , Clayton Area Rescue rose to the occasion providing EMS coverage to the citizens of the Corinth Holder Area Under the direction of then Chief Stefan Fehr , Clayton strategically put into place a fully staffed around the clock paramedic unit Now a permanent fixture in the community , and through the generosity of the Commissioners and the community , a new fire station is scheduled to be in Corinth Holder , which will also house the Clayton Area Rescue Paramedic Unit and continue to provide EMS coverage 24 hours a day The visionary foresight of the Clayton Board of Directors saw the need to hire a full - time Chief to oversee EMS operations So in August of 2005 , the first full - time EMS Chief of Clayton Area Rescue began his duties at the helm Now a year later , Clayton has expanded its full - time staff to fifteen to include a daytime Operations Captain , three shift Paramedic Lieutenants , a full - time administrative assistant , an operating budget of 13 million dollars and a volunteer force of 31 members The organization’s success can be attributed to the teamwork of the full - time and volunteer workforce The common goal of providing the best patient care has made the teams success measurable by the health and well - being of our community Clayton Area Rescue understands the importance of our County Administration and its political leaders Their job to assure that Johnston County is a seamless and efficiently run government is not an easy task Assuring the citizens have adequate EMS coverage is only one ofPage3549 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued the many duties they must undertake Although we may disagree with some of the decisions made , we honor and respect both the decisions and the political climate each Commissioner must endure The current boundary adjustment recommended by the EMS Advisory Board to the Commissioners still gives our organization an uneasy feeling as to the future of EMS delivery in the proposed boundary change Although Clayton will respect and fully support the final decision , we must address our concerns in this public forum as we have in previous meetings dealing with this boundary modification The proposed boundary adjustment does not assure adequate response times as per the County franchise agreement nor does it provide the same type of coverage throughout the twenty - four hour day The newly approved 250,000 tax increase and EMS funding disbursement for each franchise will not support this boundary change The plan’s short comings will require increase funding needed to make the boundary change successful That will surely place an even heavier financial burden on the taxpayers As Chief of Clayton Area Rescue , I ask each Commissioner to review the initial strategic plan established for the boundary change , and inquire about an alternate plan When the boundary change takes place and lacks the appropriate funding , where will the additional funding come from Also , please review the goals and standards that are in place to measure the boundary change success As part of our overall strategic plan , Clayton Area Rescue has carefully considered what is needed in the Cleveland Community for appropriate EMS delivery We have carefully studied the area growth , its projected population , transportation corridors and the health care needs of the community We ask that each Commissioner consider not limiting the growth of any EMS franchise in Johnston County If the franchise can meet the demand placed upon it without further burdening the taxpayers , receive the appropriate backing from the Johnston County Office of Emergency Services and the support of the County Commissioners , then it would only show the structure , commitment and organizational integrity of that franchise for others to follow There being no further comments , the Chairman closed the public hearing Commissioner Wade M Stewart moved the Board approve the boundary adjustment for the Clayton and 50 - 210 EMS departments Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous th vote The Board agreed to take a second vote on the item at the July 10 6 00 pm meeting 14 Public Utilities - Request for Additional Allocation – Clayton – Benson - County Wastewater Capacity Sharing Public Utilities Director Tim Broome requested the Board’s approval to allocate an additional 190,000 from Fund 68 reserve to cover project overruns in the amount of 67,000 , and substitute for an originally anticipated loan from the Town of Clayton in the amount of 123,000 He stated the project had been set up with a casual understanding between the County Manager and Town Manager that Clayton would provide the loan To simplify the book - keeping , staff is requesting the allocation from Fund 68 reserve to cover the anticipated loan Mr Broome also requested approval of the following amended project budget Current Budget Revision Amended Budget Construction Seaside Environmental 1,321,00000 57,86400 1,378,86400 Technical Services 118,00000 16,96100 134,96100 Legal & Easements 9,00000 7,82500 1,17500 Capacity Purchase from Town of Benson 300,00000 - 300,00000 Future Capacity Deposit to Benson 125,00000 - 125,00000 Contingency - - - TOTAL 1,873,00000 67,00000 1,940,00000Page4550 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued FUNDING REQUIREMENTS TO MEET PROJECT OBLIGATIONS Current Budget Revision Amended Budget Town of Clayton Loan 123,00000 123,00000 - JCPU Transfer from General Fund 260,00000 - 260,00000 JCPU Transfer from Fund 68 - 190,00000 190,00000 JCPU Transfer from 6879207400 80,00000 80,00000 - JCPU Transfer from 6879209023 10,00000 10,00000 - Capacity Fees 900,00000 900,00000 - Rural Center Grant 500,00000 500,00000 - TOTAL 1,873,00000 67,00000 1,940,00000 Commissioner Wade M Stewart moved the Board approve the following budget amendments to allocate an additional 190,000 for the Clayton – Benson - County Wastewater Capacity Sharing project , and also approve the amended project budget in the amount of 1,940,000 Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous vote FUND BUDGET LINE ITEM REQUESTED CHANGE CODE CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURE INCREASE DECREASE 68 79009023 Transfer to Other Funds 20 8405 190,00000 FUND BUDGET LINE ITEM REQUESTED CHANGE CODE CLASSIFICATION REVENUE INCREASE DECREASE 68 790033990 Fund Balance Appropriated 190,00000 FUND BUDGET LINE ITEM REQUESTED CHANGE CODE CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURE INCREASE DECREASE 20 84051800 Construction of Project 190,00000 FUND BUDGET LINE ITEM REQUESTED CHANGE CODE CLASSIFICATION REVENUE INCREASE DECREASE 20 840537925 Transfer from Other Funds fd 68 190,00000 15 Public Utilities - Budget Revision - Wastewater Facilities Improvements Public Utilities Director Tim Broome requested the Board’s approval of a budget revision to make proper adjustments to reconcile the budgets for the Wastewater Facilities Improvements project He noted that the Board adopted a resolution on September 3 , 2002 to accept a State Revolving Fund loan for Wastewater Facilities Improvements in the amount of 16,000,000 The budget for this project was allocated across three accounting codes in the Public Utilities financial system Staff needs to balance the actual expenses against the budget levels for each accounting code Also , the County has received payment for wastewater allocation from the Town of Clayton in the amount of 524,000 that must be appropriated into the budget as revenue , with an increase to the expense budget for contingency Commissioner W Ray Woodall moved the Board approve the following budget amendment to make proper adjustments to reconcile the budgets for the Wastewater Facilities Improvements project Commissioner Allen L Mims , Jr seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous vote Page5551 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued FUND BUDGET LINE ITEM REQUESTED CHANGE CODE CLASSIFICATION EXPENDITURE INCREASE DECREASE 20 84201800 Construction of Project 508,75700 20 84205599 Easements 17,00000 20 84200406 Technical Service 8,00000 20 84200400 Legal & Professional Fees 20000 20 84157406 Contingency 9,95700 TOTAL NET EXPENDITURES 524,00000 FUND BUDGET LINE ITEM REQUESTED CHANGE CODE CLASSIFICATION REVENUE INCREASE DECREASE 20 842034167 State Revolving Fund Loan 533,95700 20 841537940 Town of Clayton 524,00000 20 841534167 State Revolving Fund Loan 533,95700 524,00000 TOTAL NET REVENUE 16 Public Hearing – 1 45 pm – Amend County Code of Ordinances - Solid Waste Container Sites Public hearing was delayed due to lengthy discussion on previous items Advertised June 23 , 27 , 2006 – The Smithfield Herald The Chairman opened the public hearing , and stated the purpose of the hearing is to allow public comment on the possible amendment to the County Code of Ordinances , Chapter 20 , Article II , Section 20 - 39 - Solid Waste Container and Recycling Sites , concerning the display of solid waste decals on vehicles Assistant Public Utilities Director Haywood Phthisic addressed the Board , and stated the proposed amendment is needed to comply with the Board’s directive to require users to affix the decal on the vehicle The current ordinance allows a person to use the sites if they have the receipt of purchase and decal in hand In response to a question from Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver , Mr Phthisic commented the proposed amendment does not specify that the decal must be displayed on the vehicle windshield The proposed amendment reads “ All users disposing of solid waste are required to display a valid solid waste decal on the vehicle transporting the garbage ” Commissioner W Ray Woodall stated , in his opinion , the decal needs to be displayed on the vehicle windshield In response to a question from Commissioner Tony Braswell regarding the public’s response to the new decal fees , Mr Phthisic stated that staff has become well aware of the abuses that have occurred in years past regarding the 1 decals Commissioner Wade M Stewart asked whether there was a provision for people who might get their windshield replaced , and the sticker is affixed to the windshield Mr Phthisic noted if the individual brings the decal back to the Public Utilities office , staff will replace th the decal at no charge In response to other Board questions , he commented that as of Friday , July 7 , staff had sold approximately 7,100 full price decals , and 460 of what would have been 1 decals , but people purchased them at full price Mr Phthisic stated , to date , this is 494,000 in revenue ; he anticipated the revenue to be about the same as previous years Last year , staff sold 9,822 full price decals and 8,585 1 decals Commissioner Stewart asked Mr Phthisic whether he thought the County would sell as many household decals this year compared to last year He expressed concern that people might begin throwing their trash beside the roads , rather than using the convenience sites Mr Phthisic responded that he thought as many household decals would be sold this year , as compared to last year There being no further comments , the Chairman closed the public hearing Commissioner DeVan Barbour moved the Board specify that the decal be displayed on the vehicle windshield , and approve the following amendment to the County Code of Ordinances , Chapter 20 , Article II ,Page6552 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued Section 20 - 39 - Solid Waste Container and Recycling Sites Commissioner Wade M Stewart seconded the motion , which carried by unanimous vote Chapter 20 , Article II , Sec 20 - 39 Solid waste container and recycling sites The County operates and maintains numerous sites throughout the county for the convenience of its residents to dispose of their household waste These sites are equipped with containers for household waste and recyclable materials All users disposing of solid waste are required to display a valid solid waste decal on the windshield of the vehicle transporting the garbage or have the decal and a copy of the decal receipt proof of payment for the vehicle Users disposing of acceptable recyclable materials are not required to possess a solid waste decal The utility director shall develop a written operating policy for the container sites This policy will be adopted by the board of commissioners and may change from time to time by approval of the board At this time , Chairman Pope excused Commissioner Tony Braswell from the meeting 17 Tax Releases & Refunds – 5 16 06 - 6 15 06 Upon a motion by Commissioner W Ray Woodall , seconded by Commissioner Jeffrey P Carver and carried by unanimous vote , the Board approved the following tax releases and refunds for the period 5 16 06 to 6 15 06 Year Bill # Acct # Name Tran Type Paid 2005 0604 - 450908 0601 - 515912 BRAY , STEVEN CHRISTOPHER Release 22157 2005 0512 - 414066 0509 - 462491 HOLT , STEPHEN MARK Release 21203 2005 0605 - 477092 0509 - 462491 HOLT , STEPHEN MARK Rebill 10100 2005 0605 - 477092 0509 - 462491 HOLT , STEPHEN MARK Void Refund 10100 2005 0604 - 461564 0601 - 512505 BOYD , JAMES D Release 16154 2005 0605 - 475127 0602 - 526006 MORRIS , CHARLES RICHARD Release 24961 2005 0605 - 477012 0602 - 528276 PEAK LEASING LLC Release 24765 2005 0605 - 477011 0602 - 523904 PEAK LEASING LLC Release 32580 2005 0510 - 392780 0507 - 438790 NORDEN , ADRIENNE ALLEN Overpayment 27981 2005 0605 - 473702 0602 - 526779 NORRIS , JERRY RALPH Release 12700 2005 0508 - 365502 0505 - 401451 JONES , BILLY RAY Overpayment 19075 2005 0509 - 379582 0506 - 421019 RAINEY , TIMOTHY LYNN Overpayment 22240 2005 0605 - 468672 0602 - 528512 PENNY , JEFFREY WAYNE Release 64165 2005 0603 - 449927 0512 - 494173 LEE , RONALD KEITH Overpayment 10000 2005 0511 - 396857 0508 - 451223 CHENILLA , MAI Overpayment 16448 2005 0603 - 437997 0512 - 497756 MERCHANT , BOBBY EARL Release 14013 2004 0505 - 332379 0502 - 369580 DAVIS , BRIDGITTE EDWARDS Overpayment 13703 2005 0602 - 433653 0511 - 482166 ST PAUL AME CHURCH Release 22559 2005 0602 - 433654 0511 - 484591 ST PAUL AME CHURCH Release 24200 2005 0605 - 470631 0602 - 524711 KNAPP , LYNETTE HERRING Release 11003 2005 0603 - 439463 0512 - 492255 ASBELLE , GREGORY WAYNE Overpayment 10993 2005 0601 - 422517 0510 - 475459 JENSEN , AARON MARK Release 16864 2005 0602 - 430983 0511 - 485325 RAMBEAU , DAVID ARLEN Overpayment 10476 2005 0511 - 404698 0508 - 453621 HENRY , ORIE TAVORRIS Overpayment 11602 2005 0605 - 471163 0602 - 527747 HERRING , RANDEL CRAIG Release 25133 2005 0603 - 449593 0512 - 493549 KING , JR , L PASCAL Overpayment 13496 2005 0604 - 454583 0601 - 502705 RED HILL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST Release 39354 2005 0604 - 451907 0601 - 509261 POPE , APRIL GILLIAM Release 13801 2005 0508 - 363789 0505 - 407264 MASSEY , MONICA BISSETTE Overpayment 10300 2005 0604 - 464657 0601 - 509196 DICKSON , PENNY DOBBIN Overpayment 1,08214 2005 0604 - 464657 0601 - 509196 DICKSON , PENNY DOBBIN Void Refund 1,08214 2005 0605 - 467302 0602 - 528511 CASEY , CHRISTOPHER CARVER Release 12733 2005 0604 - 453831 0601 - 513827 KENNETH R JACKSON INC Release 80615 2005 0512 - 413911 0509 - 464250 ATKINSON , ROBERT WESLEY Overpayment 14257 2005 0605 - 477013 0602 - 527294 U S CELLULAR Release 52575 2005 0509 - 370914 0506 - 426745 PANTER , SKYLAR DAN Release 29741 2005 0511 - 396857 0508 - 451223 CHENILLA , MAI Overpayment 14735 2005 0601 - 422491 0510 - 472025 HAWKINS , TRACEY MICHELLE Tag Surrender 11441 2005 0510 - 389407 0507 - 438586 CRAMER , JUSTIN MICHEAL Overpayment 19263 Page7553 July 10 , 2006 – 1 00 pm Continued 2005 0604 - 457175 0601 - 509439 SULLIVAN , JEFFREY LON Release 17010 2005 0603 - 439621 0512 - 491178 BJORLING , JENNIFER LANGSTON Overpayment 12525 2005 0605 - 467469 0602 - 528028 DANKO , EUGENE MARTIN Release 11130 2004 0505 - 332962 0502 - 372283 MORRIS , CHARLES RICHARD Release 28782 2005 0605 - 476789 0602 - 523767 JONES , II , CURTIS WAYNE Release 19347 2005 0605 - 476790 0602 - 526465 JONES , II , CURTIS WAYNE Release 16642 2005 0507 - 355169 0504 - 397253 GREEN , BOBBIE HARRELL Overpayment 10424 2004 0506 - 335902 0503 - 385948 MCLAMB , CHARLOTTE BENSON Overpayment 10057 2005 0605 - 471829 0602 - 522009 LANGLEY , EUGENE DEXTER Release 21571 2005 0603 - 442224 0512 - 496231 BAKER , TIMOTHY ROY Overpayment 17772 2005 0604 - 463815 0601 - 505681 ANDERSON , ROBERT CONOVER Overpayment 10406 2005 0605 - 469157 0602 - 520368 THOMPSON , FELICIA WHEELER Release 12031 2004 0504 - 321926 0501 - 356944 WEATHERS , WESLEY GLEN Release 15505 2005 0512 - 410010 0509 - 457780 MURRAY , III , RICHARD NORMAN Overpayment 16265 2005 0601 - 426101 0510 - 476158 HARRIS , III , ROBERT JOSEPH Overpayment 31503 2005 0605 - 477014 0602 - 527203 BASS , LOUIS FRANKLIN Release 23013 2005 0601 - 422509 0510 - 469280 HUDSON , ANNE JOHNSON Overpayment 23595 2005 0512 - 415873 0509 - 458720 HORTON , JR , CHARLES ERVIN Overpayment 18330 1995 9509 - 193202 9506 - 284237 MAST , REBECCA KING Overpayment 36662 2005 0601 - 421360 0510 - 471965 WATKINS , ARTHUR WILLIAM Overpayment 24290 2005 0605 - 476834 0